Members banned from this thread: evince, CFM and Русский агент


Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 58

Thread: California Demicrats Now Concerned About Wealthy Leaving California

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default California Demicrats Now Concerned About Wealthy Leaving California

    Kind of interesting to hear this concern coming from democrats this time. Because of the elimination of the SALT deductions a good number of Californian's will see their taxes increase. Will it cause people to leave? We'll see. California relies heavily on income tax and the top one percent pays 48% of that so the state needs them to stay.



    Wealthy exodus to escape new tax rules worries California Democrats


    The Republican-backed federal tax bill flipped the tables on a never-ending question for California politicians: Will high taxes lead the state’s wealthiest residents to flee the Golden State for the comparable tax havens of Florida, Nevada and Texas?
    Republicans reliably raise that alarm when Democrats advocate for tax increases, like the 2012 and 2016 ballot initiatives that levied a new income tax on very high-earning residents.

    But now, with the federal tax bill cutting off deductions that benefited well-off Californians, the state’s Democrats suddenly are singing the GOP song about a potential millionaire exodus.

    “People with higher incomes pay a lot more money, and some of them may be tempted to leave,” Gov. Jerry Brown said when he unveiled his 2018-19 budget proposal last week. “This was an assault by the Republicans in Congress against California.”

    That fear animates Senate President pro tem Kevin de León’s bill that would allow California residents to write off their state taxes on their federal returns as a charitable deduction, as well as other proposals that Assembly leaders have hinted they’re preparing to offer. De Leon’s bill cleared a second committee this week and is on its way to a vote on the Senate floor. Trump administration officials say it won’t pass muster with the IRS.

    Democratic state lawmakers are worried because California relies so heavily on the income taxes it collects from high earners to fund government services. The state’s wealthiest 1 percent, for instance, pay 48 percent of its income tax, and the departure of just a few families could lead to a noticeable hit to state general fund revenue.

    “It is a genuine concern and that’s why the legislatures in high-tax states are swinging into action immediately,” said Katie Pratt, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles who specializes in taxes.

    The new federal tax law poses problems for high earners in the Golden State because it caps two deductions that Californians used to limit their federal income tax liability, restricting their ability to write off mortgage interest and their state and local taxes.

    Because real estate in coastal counties is so expensive with median home prices in the nine-county Bay Area topping $768,000, the cap on mortgage interest deductions probably will bite some middle class Californians, too.

    In two reports last month, the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy found that 11 percent of Californians would wind up with a tax increase because of the federal changes.

    Among high income brackets, about 38 percent of Californians who earn more than $877,560 – the top 1 percent – would see a tax hike. About 25 percent of Californians earning between $130,820 and $304,630, also would see a tax increase, according to the tax policy institute.

    Will the numbers add up to encourage a high-earning family to leave California?

    “The new tax law is kind of like icing on the cake for some who were thinking about moving out of the state,” said Fiona Ma, a Democrat on the tax-collecting Board of Equalization who is running for state treasurer. “If they don’t have to stay here because of work or family, it doesn’t give them a lot of incentive.”

    So far, research on the migration of wealthy Californians suggests that most very well off people are tied to their communities or businesses and do not often migrate for tax reasons.

    A 2012 study by Stanford researchers, for example, found that millionaires are mostly rooted to their locations for economic reasons. The work, “Millionaire Migration,” was based on data from the Franchise Tax Board and looked at Californians who earned more than $1 million in a year and paid a special tax for mental health services.

    The authors expanded on their report for a 2016 study that incorporated more data from other states. It found, “elites are embedded in the regions where they achieve success, and they have limited interest in moving to procure tax advantages.”
    Another 2016 study by Next 10 found that more people moved out of California to other states than immigrated to California from other parts of the country between 2007 and 2014, although the Golden State continued to attract high earners in that period.

    “Despite the rhetoric regarding California’s oppressive tax regime and its overall hostility to business, individuals coming to California are primarily concentrated in high wage occupations, which enable them to absorb the state’s high housing costs and cost of living,” the report said.

    But State Controller Betty Yee, a Democrat who was a member of the Board of Equalization when it commissioned the Stanford study, said the combination of the state’s high housing prices and the cap on mortgage interest deductions present a different problem than that report considered.

    Previously, the state income taxes on high earners only affected residents when their incomes exceeded certain thresholds. If their income depended on stock market gains or bonuses, they didn’t pay the special taxes every year.

    Now, they’ll have to budget for the changes in the federal tax law every year, and Yee said that may lead some people to make a different calculation when they decide where to live.

    “The GOP tax plan I think has a much broader impact on a cross-section of California taxpayers,” she said. “It’s a much more volatile situation.”

    Other members of the Board of Equalization, who have spent years weighing appeals from people fighting California tax bills, aren’t worried about the 1 percent leaving California because of the new tax law. They say they’re more concerned about middle and upper-middle class Californians deciding they’d be better off in another state.

    Extremely wealthy people “are not leaving,” said George Runner, a Republican member of the board. “They don’t’ have to for the same reason they have $100,000 of wine in the basement. It doesn’t affect them.”

    “What I’m concerned about is the people in the middle class, retired cops and teachers,” he said, arguing that those kinds of residents in the Central Valley and inland Southern California would benefit from the overall tax cuts in the GOP plan.
    Joseph Vranich, who leads an Orange County business that advises people on where to locate their businesses, called the tax law “one more nail in the coffin” that would cause small- and middle-size entrepreneurs to leave California.

    Often, he said, high income taxes, high gas taxes and strict environmental regulations lead his clients to choose other states. “When you add it all together, I call it death by a thousand cuts, and this latest law is one more cut,” he said.
    Brown and Yee so far are not endorsing de León’s bill to strike back at the federal tax law.

    Both said that they need more time to` see how the changes will play out, and both have argued that the state should consider broader changes to its tax code so the general fund is less reliant on high earners having good years.

    Neither could say for sure whether they believe well-off Californians would leave, and Brown at his press conference last week contrasted his worry about a migration of successful entrepreneurs with a reminder of what brought them here in the first place.

    “California has a lot of opportunity. That’s why people are here,” he said.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    28,869
    Thanks
    26,625
    Thanked 14,366 Times in 9,866 Posts
    Groans
    563
    Groaned 608 Times in 575 Posts

    Default

    Wealthy Leaving California
    Hmm ... that certainly is one way to solve California's wealth inequality problem.
    "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
    — Joe Biden on Obama.

    Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.

    D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.

    Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".

  3. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bigdog For This Post:

    Callinectes (01-20-2018), Cancel 2018.1 (01-20-2018), cancel2 2022 (01-19-2018), Minister of Truth (01-20-2018), Sailor (01-19-2018), transwarpdrive (01-19-2018)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    "Democratic state lawmakers are worried because California relies so heavily on the income taxes it collects from high earners to fund government services. The state’s wealthiest 1 percent, for instance, pay 48 percent of its income tax, and the departure of just a few families could lead to a noticeable hit to state general fund revenue."

    This is where the rubber meets the road. For all those always complaining about the wealthy not paying enough, guess who is going to have to make up the tax base when they leave?

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,291
    Thanks
    13,303
    Thanked 40,970 Times in 32,285 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    door.......horse......barn......

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Callinectes (01-20-2018), Sailor (01-19-2018)

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,172
    Thanks
    35,729
    Thanked 50,676 Times in 27,321 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Maybe it is just me, but I have never met a person that moved to a state because of taxes.

    It might be way down on the lower ladder rungs of priorities - but I cannot say I have ever met anyone who said it was a make or break issue.

    I think California will be okay, Cawacko.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    TTQ64 (01-19-2018)

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Maybe it is just me, but I have never met a person that moved to a state because of taxes.

    It might be way down on the lower ladder rungs of priorities - but I cannot say I have ever met anyone who said it was a make or break issue.

    I think California will be okay, Cawacko.
    I wonder how many times you will ponder "if it is just you", before you begin to realise that it is?

    Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    Callinectes (01-20-2018), Minister of Truth (01-20-2018), transwarpdrive (01-19-2018)

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Maybe it is just me, but I have never met a person that moved to a state because of taxes.

    It might be way down on the lower ladder rungs of priorities - but I cannot say I have ever met anyone who said it was a make or break issue.

    I think California will be okay, Cawacko.
    I don't know people who have moved strictly for taxes but I also don't that many wealthy people. I do know many people who have either moved out of California because of cost or are considering it and rising taxes doesn't help.

    Unless this Sac Bee article was done for click bait the concerns from the politicians interviewed is real. They know they soak the 1% in this state and people leaving would have an affect on the state's revenues.

    Is California going down the drain? Of course not. But this is a concern to them

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to cawacko For This Post:

    dukkha (01-19-2018)

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Maybe it is just me, but I have never met a person that moved to a state because of taxes.

    It might be way down on the lower ladder rungs of priorities - but I cannot say I have ever met anyone who said it was a make or break issue.

    I think California will be okay, Cawacko.
    one of the main reasons I left Maryland
    ( very high taxes including "flush tax" on bathrooms and "rain tax" on pavement) was for very low taxes in Florida.

    I agree with you it wasn't the main reason, my family all wanted out -and since I'm single and my parents were aging I was happy to move down here..

    But high taxes are figured in any household budget , and can be a compelling -if not sole reason -to move out
    ++

    California relies heavily on income tax and the top one percent pays 48% of that so the state needs them to stay.
    ^ wow!

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    TTQ64, you claim the 1% don't pay any taxes. So is the Sac Bee lying here?


    ""Democratic state lawmakers are worried because California relies so heavily on the income taxes it collects from high earners to fund government services. The state’s wealthiest 1 percent, for instance, pay 48 percent of its income tax, and the departure of just a few families could lead to a noticeable hit to state general fund revenue.""

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    4,929
    Thanked 3,685 Times in 2,733 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 707 Times in 647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    TTQ64, you claim the 1% don't pay any taxes. So is the Sac Bee lying here?


    ""Democratic state lawmakers are worried because California relies so heavily on the income taxes it collects from high earners to fund government services. The state’s wealthiest 1 percent, for instance, pay 48 percent of its income tax, and the departure of just a few families could lead to a noticeable hit to state general fund revenue.""
    OH please.

    No one is leaving or complaining about taxes, doesn't matter if that lie comes from you, or the sacramento bee.

    This article sounds like it was written by some right wing kook.

    Again, I won't seriously respond to your outlandish claims of what's happening here in CA when I was born and raised here, I know better.

    You can continue speaking with sailor......(someone who lives in the sea, doubt he ever lived in CA) and the two of you can continue trash talking CA as you all did with Chi.

    I don't believe your lies nor do I condone them. I won't legitimize your false post/statement with real truths or solutions.........it's not something your interested in.

    carry on!

  16. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    West end Of The Erie Canal
    Posts
    2,322
    Thanks
    290
    Thanked 737 Times in 591 Posts
    Groans
    67
    Groaned 371 Times in 328 Posts

    Default

    The People's Republik of New Yorkistan has been facing the same problem for DECADES now. And none of Prince Andrew's "tax break" gimmicks are going to lure private sector businesses, let alone expats into the Vampire State. New York has been consistently dead last in private sector expansion/growth but numero uno in the welfare and Medicaid bennies. Go figure.

    THE OFFICIAL FLAG OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    West end Of The Erie Canal
    Posts
    2,322
    Thanks
    290
    Thanked 737 Times in 591 Posts
    Groans
    67
    Groaned 371 Times in 328 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TTQ64 View Post
    OH please.

    No one is leaving or complaining about taxes, doesn't matter if that lie comes from you, or the sacramento bee.

    This article sounds like it was written by some right wing kook.

    Again, I won't seriously respond to your outlandish claims of what's happening here in CA when I was born and raised here, I know better.

    You can continue speaking with sailor......(someone who lives in the sea, doubt he ever lived in CA) and the two of you can continue trash talking CA as you all did with Chi.

    I don't believe your lies nor do I condone them. I won't legitimize your false post/statement with real truths or solutions.........it's not something your interested in.

    carry on!
    I sincerely hope from the bottom of my heart that the San Andreas has a major conniption fit soon. That's surely solve our problems with the land of fruits, nuts, and flakes.

    THE OFFICIAL FLAG OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,893
    Thanks
    3,736
    Thanked 20,386 Times in 14,102 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TTQ64 View Post
    OH please.

    No one is leaving or complaining about taxes, doesn't matter if that lie comes from you, or the sacramento bee.

    This article sounds like it was written by some right wing kook.

    Again, I won't seriously respond to your outlandish claims of what's happening here in CA when I was born and raised here, I know better.

    You can continue speaking with sailor......(someone who lives in the sea, doubt he ever lived in CA) and the two of you can continue trash talking CA as you all did with Chi.

    I don't believe your lies nor do I condone them. I won't legitimize your false post/statement with real truths or solutions.........it's not something your interested in.

    carry on!
    So it's a lie that the 1% pays 48% of the state taxes? Do you have an accurate number?

  19. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Arguendo, why shouldn't people be worried about the rich sucking up all the money and leaving the state, as the OP assumes.

    State taxes are no big deal and there is cachet in a business presence in the best state, the one with the most money that leads the world in tech, culture and ag.

    We own you. Cali goes dark you wouldn't know whether to shit or wind your watches.

  20. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    11,390
    Thanks
    476
    Thanked 4,028 Times in 3,012 Posts
    Groans
    398
    Groaned 234 Times in 225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    Kind of interesting to hear this concern coming from democrats this time. Because of the elimination of the SALT deductions a good number of Californian's will see their taxes increase. Will it cause people to leave? We'll see. California relies heavily on income tax and the top one percent pays 48% of that so the state needs them to stay.



    Wealthy exodus to escape new tax rules worries California Democrats


    The Republican-backed federal tax bill flipped the tables on a never-ending question for California politicians: Will high taxes lead the state’s wealthiest residents to flee the Golden State for the comparable tax havens of Florida, Nevada and Texas?
    Republicans reliably raise that alarm when Democrats advocate for tax increases, like the 2012 and 2016 ballot initiatives that levied a new income tax on very high-earning residents.

    But now, with the federal tax bill cutting off deductions that benefited well-off Californians, the state’s Democrats suddenly are singing the GOP song about a potential millionaire exodus.

    “People with higher incomes pay a lot more money, and some of them may be tempted to leave,” Gov. Jerry Brown said when he unveiled his 2018-19 budget proposal last week. “This was an assault by the Republicans in Congress against California.”

    That fear animates Senate President pro tem Kevin de León’s bill that would allow California residents to write off their state taxes on their federal returns as a charitable deduction, as well as other proposals that Assembly leaders have hinted they’re preparing to offer. De Leon’s bill cleared a second committee this week and is on its way to a vote on the Senate floor. Trump administration officials say it won’t pass muster with the IRS.

    Democratic state lawmakers are worried because California relies so heavily on the income taxes it collects from high earners to fund government services. The state’s wealthiest 1 percent, for instance, pay 48 percent of its income tax, and the departure of just a few families could lead to a noticeable hit to state general fund revenue.

    “It is a genuine concern and that’s why the legislatures in high-tax states are swinging into action immediately,” said Katie Pratt, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles who specializes in taxes.

    The new federal tax law poses problems for high earners in the Golden State because it caps two deductions that Californians used to limit their federal income tax liability, restricting their ability to write off mortgage interest and their state and local taxes.

    Because real estate in coastal counties is so expensive with median home prices in the nine-county Bay Area topping $768,000, the cap on mortgage interest deductions probably will bite some middle class Californians, too.

    In two reports last month, the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy found that 11 percent of Californians would wind up with a tax increase because of the federal changes.

    Among high income brackets, about 38 percent of Californians who earn more than $877,560 – the top 1 percent – would see a tax hike. About 25 percent of Californians earning between $130,820 and $304,630, also would see a tax increase, according to the tax policy institute.

    Will the numbers add up to encourage a high-earning family to leave California?

    “The new tax law is kind of like icing on the cake for some who were thinking about moving out of the state,” said Fiona Ma, a Democrat on the tax-collecting Board of Equalization who is running for state treasurer. “If they don’t have to stay here because of work or family, it doesn’t give them a lot of incentive.”

    So far, research on the migration of wealthy Californians suggests that most very well off people are tied to their communities or businesses and do not often migrate for tax reasons.

    A 2012 study by Stanford researchers, for example, found that millionaires are mostly rooted to their locations for economic reasons. The work, “Millionaire Migration,” was based on data from the Franchise Tax Board and looked at Californians who earned more than $1 million in a year and paid a special tax for mental health services.

    The authors expanded on their report for a 2016 study that incorporated more data from other states. It found, “elites are embedded in the regions where they achieve success, and they have limited interest in moving to procure tax advantages.”
    Another 2016 study by Next 10 found that more people moved out of California to other states than immigrated to California from other parts of the country between 2007 and 2014, although the Golden State continued to attract high earners in that period.

    “Despite the rhetoric regarding California’s oppressive tax regime and its overall hostility to business, individuals coming to California are primarily concentrated in high wage occupations, which enable them to absorb the state’s high housing costs and cost of living,” the report said.

    But State Controller Betty Yee, a Democrat who was a member of the Board of Equalization when it commissioned the Stanford study, said the combination of the state’s high housing prices and the cap on mortgage interest deductions present a different problem than that report considered.

    Previously, the state income taxes on high earners only affected residents when their incomes exceeded certain thresholds. If their income depended on stock market gains or bonuses, they didn’t pay the special taxes every year.

    Now, they’ll have to budget for the changes in the federal tax law every year, and Yee said that may lead some people to make a different calculation when they decide where to live.

    “The GOP tax plan I think has a much broader impact on a cross-section of California taxpayers,” she said. “It’s a much more volatile situation.”

    Other members of the Board of Equalization, who have spent years weighing appeals from people fighting California tax bills, aren’t worried about the 1 percent leaving California because of the new tax law. They say they’re more concerned about middle and upper-middle class Californians deciding they’d be better off in another state.

    Extremely wealthy people “are not leaving,” said George Runner, a Republican member of the board. “They don’t’ have to for the same reason they have $100,000 of wine in the basement. It doesn’t affect them.”

    “What I’m concerned about is the people in the middle class, retired cops and teachers,” he said, arguing that those kinds of residents in the Central Valley and inland Southern California would benefit from the overall tax cuts in the GOP plan.
    Joseph Vranich, who leads an Orange County business that advises people on where to locate their businesses, called the tax law “one more nail in the coffin” that would cause small- and middle-size entrepreneurs to leave California.

    Often, he said, high income taxes, high gas taxes and strict environmental regulations lead his clients to choose other states. “When you add it all together, I call it death by a thousand cuts, and this latest law is one more cut,” he said.
    Brown and Yee so far are not endorsing de León’s bill to strike back at the federal tax law.

    Both said that they need more time to` see how the changes will play out, and both have argued that the state should consider broader changes to its tax code so the general fund is less reliant on high earners having good years.

    Neither could say for sure whether they believe well-off Californians would leave, and Brown at his press conference last week contrasted his worry about a migration of successful entrepreneurs with a reminder of what brought them here in the first place.

    “California has a lot of opportunity. That’s why people are here,” he said.
    Good. You deserve what is coming. Just bring in more low skilled illegal immigrants and it will fix everything

Similar Threads

  1. Is California splitting away? Group believes California should
    By Ass Man in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-29-2016, 12:00 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-17-2014, 12:11 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-18-2014, 05:42 PM
  4. Only In California
    By RockX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-07-2010, 06:50 AM
  5. California
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: 12-20-2007, 04:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •