Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 77

Thread: Indictment in Russian collusion case

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,974
    Thanks
    255
    Thanked 24,861 Times in 17,284 Posts
    Groans
    5,353
    Groaned 4,603 Times in 4,280 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    true enough.......as is the fact that the Clintons received millions of dollars before she instructed the state department to approve the transfer.........
    I await your proof. The Clintons received nothing. Nor did she approve the transfer. You do know the uranium never left the US and was never going to, don't you? Sorry. I forgot. you are watching Fox gnus and have alternate facts. Hewre is the paperwork. Note the last line where it says none of those in the deal hold export licenses, so no uranium can be exported. https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webS...er=ML103300018

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,384
    Thanks
    13,310
    Thanked 41,002 Times in 32,307 Posts
    Groans
    3,666
    Groaned 2,870 Times in 2,757 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    I await your proof. The Clintons received nothing. Nor did she approve the transfer. You do know the uranium never left the US and was never going to, don't you? Sorry. I forgot. you are watching Fox gnus and have alternate facts. Hewre is the paperwork. Note the last line where it says none of those in the deal hold export licenses, so no uranium can be exported. https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webS...er=ML103300018
    haven't you been paying attention?......no proof is required for Russian collusion........only accusation......

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-20-2018)

  4. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,974
    Thanks
    255
    Thanked 24,861 Times in 17,284 Posts
    Groans
    5,353
    Groaned 4,603 Times in 4,280 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    haven't you been paying attention?......no proof is required for Russian collusion........only accusation......
    Actually it does. trump has piles of evidence showing his involvement on money laundering and obstruction. Those are crimes. Collusion is very tough to prove. It requires intent. Defining Trumps actions as collusion is bad. He and his kids have been acting in coordination with the Russians and Wikileaks. They have obstructed the investigations. I am sure Trump will resign, hoping that the Law will be satisfied with that. Much like Ford did with letting Nixon skate.

  5. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,183
    Thanks
    2,838
    Thanked 4,324 Times in 2,774 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    So you think the Trump colluded with Russia story is a straight one? Moron.
    No, I don't. This is what I posted earlier:

    >> As for Trump colluding with Russians, I have never said anything about that here or anywhere else. Actually I doubt that Trump was personally involved. If I were running a foreign operation to sabotage US elections, I sure as hell wouldn't confide in blabbermouth. <<

    Why don't you go detect some truth? It would make a nice change for you.

  6. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,384
    Thanks
    13,310
    Thanked 41,002 Times in 32,307 Posts
    Groans
    3,666
    Groaned 2,870 Times in 2,757 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    yeah I know......I got nothing
    we know.....

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-20-2018)

  8. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NOTHINGberger View Post
    Actually it does. trump has piles of evidence showing his involvement on money laundering and obstruction. Those are crimes. Collusion is very tough to prove. It requires intent. Defining Trumps actions as collusion is bad. He and his kids have been acting in coordination with the Russians and Wikileaks. They have obstructed the investigations. I am sure Trump will resign, hoping that the Law will be satisfied with that. Much like Ford did with letting Nixon skate.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  9. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DUMBASS in Exile View Post
    I don't care if it goes all the way down to Old Nick - who the heck was bribing who(m)?
    You guys need to get your story straight.
    Quote Originally Posted by DUMBASS in Exile View Post
    No, I don't. This is what I posted earlier:

    >> As for Trump colluding with Russians, I have never said anything about that here or anywhere else. Actually I doubt that Trump was personally involved. If I were running a foreign operation to sabotage US elections, I sure as hell wouldn't confide in blabbermouth. <<

    Why don't you go detect some truth? It would make a nice change for you.
    Dear idiot; I was responding to the post above and your moronic RWNJ comments. Fuck off and die already.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  10. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    I await your proof. The Clintons received nothing. Nor did she approve the transfer. You do know the uranium never left the US and was never going to, don't you? Sorry. I forgot. you are watching Fox gnus and have alternate facts. Hewre is the paperwork. Note the last line where it says none of those in the deal hold export licenses, so no uranium can be exported. https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webS...er=ML103300018
    You really should keep better informed.

    Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

    Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe, government documents show.

    NRC officials told The Hill that Uranium One exports flowed from Wyoming to Canada and on to Europe between 2012 and 2014, and the approval involved a process with multiple agencies.

    Rather than give Rosatom a direct export license — which would have raised red flags inside a Congress already suspicious of the deal — the NRC in 2012 authorized an amendment to an existing export license for a Paducah, Ky.-based trucking firm called RSB Logistics Services Inc. to simply add Uranium One to the list of clients whose uranium it could move to Canada.

    The license, reviewed by The Hill, is dated March 16, 2012, and it increased the amount of uranium ore concentrate that RSB Logistics could ship to the Cameco Corp. plant in Ontario from 7,500,000 kilograms to 12,000,000 kilograms and added Uranium One to the “other parties to Export.”

    Uranium One's American arm, however, emailed a statement to The Hill on Wednesday evening confirming it did export uranium to Canada through the trucking firm and that 25 percent of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia
    Every life matters

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to countryboy For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-20-2018)

  12. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,183
    Thanks
    2,838
    Thanked 4,324 Times in 2,774 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Dear idiot; I was responding to the post above and your moronic RWNJ comments. Fuck off and die already.
    You think I'm a RWNJ? Lol! Get your detector checked, it's faulty.

  13. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,974
    Thanks
    255
    Thanked 24,861 Times in 17,284 Posts
    Groans
    5,353
    Groaned 4,603 Times in 4,280 Posts

    Default

    So Canada is now russia. I missed that. It was a Canadian owned company until Russia bought out 51 percent. But none, zero, of the uranium went to Russia. Now show me where Hillary approved the sale. And follow that with showing the export licenses.

  14. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,777 Times in 27,251 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  15. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,777 Times in 27,251 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Mark Lambert, 54, of Mount Airy, Maryland, was charged in an 11-count indictment with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and to commit wire fraud, seven counts of violating the FCPA, two counts of wire fraud and one count of international promotion money laundering.* The charges stem from an alleged scheme to bribe Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official at JSC Techsnabexport (TENEX), a subsidiary of Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation and the sole supplier and exporter of Russian Federation uranium and uranium enrichment services to nuclear power companies worldwide, in order to secure contracts with TENEX.*
    *



    thank you for helping prove your idiot beliefs that CEOs are saints


    this has nothing to do with our government doing anything wrong you asshole

    this is a wealthy shit head gaming capitalism and licking putin ass


    Im sure the republican party will want him to run for office after hes tried and convicted






    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/forme...elated-foreign


    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha



    a CEO wealthy fuck PAID PUTIN asshole

  16. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    just how does this involve hilary you lying retrobate
    Lol! What's a "retrobate"?
    Every life matters

  17. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,777 Times in 27,251 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reprobate



    Definition of reprobate
    reprobated; reprobating
    transitive verb
    1
    : to condemn strongly as unworthy, unacceptable, or evil reprobating the laxity of the age
    2
    : to foreordain to damnation
    3
    : to refuse to accept : reject

  18. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Dear idiot; I was responding to the post above and your moronic RWNJ comments. Fuck off and die already.
    Quote Originally Posted by DUMBFUCK in Exile View Post
    You think I'm a RWNJ? Lol! Get your detector checked, it's faulty.
    So not only are you a moron, but also have a serious reading comprehension problem.

    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

Similar Threads

  1. Jill Stein's Russian Collusion
    By anatta in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-21-2017, 09:40 AM
  2. FBI reveals evidence of Russian collusion
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-17-2017, 01:14 PM
  3. APP - Russian Collusion?
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-28-2017, 06:42 AM
  4. APP - The real threat of the Russian collusion lies
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-16-2017, 09:40 AM
  5. Russian Collusion!!!!
    By tsuke in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-14-2017, 05:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •