Noteworthy due to the investigating source, the w

[archives]

"Trump lawyer arranged hush money payment to porn star - report"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-...-to-porn-star/

"Trump Lawyer Arranged $130,000 Payment for Adult-Film Star’s Silence"

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-l...nce-1515787678

[PostmodernProphet]

"Trump lawyer arranged hush money payment to porn star - report"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-...-to-porn-star/

"Trump Lawyer Arranged $130,000 Payment for Adult-Film Star’s Silence"

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-l...nce-1515787678

so basically all the parties have denied this except a reporter?.......gosh.......obviously it must be true.......

[archives]

so basically all the parties have denied this except a reporter?.......gosh.......obviously it must be true.......

Ah, last I knew, the Wall Street Journal ain't a publication that leans left

[Tranquillus in Exile]

so basically all the parties have denied this except a reporter?

The Wall Street Journal is part of the liberal MSM fake news conspiracy, you know ...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-l...nce-1515787678

[Controlled Opposition]

Another MSM article attributed to unnamed sources, in this case, “people familiar with the matter."

[archives]

Another MSM article attributed to unnamed sources, in this case, “people familiar with the matter."

Ah, the Wall Street Journal is owned by the Rupert Murdoch, and as I said, the last I noticed the Murdoch family, the same people that own Fox TV, don't lean left

Try to keep up

[Controlled Opposition]

Ah, the Wall Street Journal is owned by the Rupert Murdoch, and as I said, the last I noticed the Murdoch family, the same people that own Fox TV, don't lean left

Try to keep up

You're the one who isn't keeping up. You've offered an opinion based on nothing but your biases. Who are the sources? Can you do better than, "people familiar with the matter?" It's a yes or no question.

[archives]

You're the one who isn't keeping up. You've offered an opinion based on nothing but your biases. Who are the sources? Can you do better than, "people familiar with the matter?" It's a yes or no question.

Are you daft man, or just can't read, "due to the investigating source," a standard conservative source was the one running the story, they did the investigation, it ain't got nothing to do with my "bias"

[hvilleherb]

"Trump lawyer arranged hush money payment to porn star - report"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-...-to-porn-star/

"Trump Lawyer Arranged $130,000 Payment for Adult-Film Star’s Silence"

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-l...nce-1515787678

We could have elected Hillary instead, but then I wouldn't be getting my tax cut. All is forgiven.

[PostmodernProphet]

Ah, last I knew, the Wall Street Journal ain't a publication that leans left

yeah, I can't imagine why I shouldn't believe a random single newspaper reporter with no evidence........

[Controlled Opposition]

Are you daft man, or just can't read, "due to the investigating source," a standard conservative source was the one running the story, they did the investigation, it ain't got nothing to do with my "bias"

First, I asked a "yes" or "no" question, which was too complicated for you. Second, you have made it clear that critical thinking is not your forte.

When "journalists" can get away with citing, "sources" as "people familiar with the matter," they are not reporters. They are repeaters.