Members banned from this thread: evince and CFM


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: FCC votes to repeal Obama's "net neutrality" rules

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default FCC votes to repeal Obama's "net neutrality" rules




    Discuss.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    i personally think that the only side we hear is the ones for Net neutrality. this is a video by Crowder. I think it does a lot to explain the other side.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  3. The Following User Groans At tsuke For This Awful Post:

    FUCK THE POLICE (12-14-2017)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    btw the people who are most for net neutrality are also the ones who do the most to silence conservative or nationalist thought.

    Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and other online companies all have taken actions to ban or limit the sharing of content on the right. If they want something this strongly you should take a long hard look at it.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  5. The Following User Groans At tsuke For This Awful Post:

    FUCK THE POLICE (12-14-2017)

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tsuke For This Post:

    dukkha (12-14-2017), Life is Golden (12-15-2017)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Liberals support it because it was an Obama government power grab, don't they?

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Conservatives can't be for Banning net neutrality because net neutrality is about freedom

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    btw the people who are most for net neutrality are also the ones who do the most to silence conservative or nationalist thought.

    Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and other online companies all have taken actions to ban or limit the sharing of content on the right. If they want something this strongly you should take a long hard look at it.
    Your post is irrational because net neutrality means an open internet so whoever can't be silenced you don't know what you're talking about

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Katzgutz seems angry.

    I don't know why he would be, unless tsuke's points are valid.

    The internet worked just fine before Obama made it subject to so-called "net neutrality", as far as I can recall.

    Now we're back to the future.

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    16,197
    Thanks
    11,001
    Thanked 19,599 Times in 9,131 Posts
    Groans
    1,451
    Groaned 1,428 Times in 1,257 Posts

    Default

    This asinine move by FCC, will fought in the courts, possibly for years!

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to signalmankenneth For This Post:

    FUCK THE POLICE (12-14-2017), TTQ64 (12-15-2017)

  13. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    25,013
    Thanks
    7,092
    Thanked 10,659 Times in 7,357 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,968 Times in 1,784 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by signalmankenneth View Post
    This asinine move by FCC, will fought in the courts, possibly for years!
    And over and over the voters will be reminded which party once again chose $$$ over well being of their fellow Americans.
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  14. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    I don't see a cogent argument for retaining Obama's so-called "net neutrality" policy.

    Is there a reason why nobody has presented one?

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Get rid of n.n. ............... it's just more big government invasion into the private sector.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  16. The Following User Groans At Stretch For This Awful Post:

    FUCK THE POLICE (12-14-2017)

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,184
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,183 Times in 13,933 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,051 Times in 2,846 Posts

    Default

    That's pretty funny, like a lot of issues, conservatives really don't understand the issue, but are easy to jump on any argument that they think supports how they want to feel about the issue. Emoji here, and often, is a good example, that's why he has to import a video to supposedly demonstrate his view when in reality all he understands is that it has something to do with Obama so he's against it

    Guarantee down the road when they have to pay more to get their Brietfarts and InfoWars it will all then become " Obama's fault"

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to archives For This Post:

    FUCK THE POLICE (12-14-2017), TTQ64 (12-15-2017)

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,184
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,183 Times in 13,933 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,051 Times in 2,846 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    Get rid of n.n. ............... it's just more big government invasion into the private sector.
    No, just like class action law suits that were eliminated and consumer watchdogs restricted, it is protectionism, not regulation, you really didn't think the business was an open market did you?

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    TTQ64 (12-15-2017)

  21. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    Get rid of n.n. ............... it's just more big government invasion into the private sector.

    Okay now you just look like a foolish government control freak

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to katzgar For This Post:

    TTQ64 (12-15-2017)

  23. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    i personally think that the only side we hear is the ones for Net neutrality. this is a video by Crowder. I think it does a lot to explain the other side.
    Fuck Crowder. ISP's shouldn't be allowed any control at all over the information they carry. They are mail men, they have no right to open the envelopes and charge you extra based on the content.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

Similar Threads

  1. Why ironically-named "net neutrality" must die
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-03-2017, 09:50 PM
  2. Remember when McCain said "repeal & replace"? Pepe remembers 🐸
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-26-2017, 01:19 AM
  3. Replies: 113
    Last Post: 03-31-2017, 07:32 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2017, 04:42 PM
  5. Replies: 264
    Last Post: 01-06-2017, 01:55 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •