Thanks liberals

[zappasguitar]

You don't see the difference between baseless allegations and the Clinton sex scandals? Seriously?

Actually the "Clinton sex scandals" were based on nothing but baseless, unfounded allegations.

Not a single charge was levied...not a single guilty plea was uttered.

And of course, due process mattered not to the GOP during their witch hunt

[USFREEDOM911]

You don't see the difference between baseless allegations and the Clinton sex scandals? Seriously?

The liberal base has always suffered from selective sight and hearing and now it's selective memory.

So sad.

[USFREEDOM911]

Actually, the right wing media has been doing that for decades, except they wouldn't go as far as "holding news conferences," rather their tactic was to introduce an innuendo, and then "promote what ever" the innuendo implied "to denigrate the political opposition."

[zappasguitar]

Looks like Zippy conveniently "forgot" the fact that Blowjob Billy (BJB) was guilty of a sexual dalliance with a young intern.

He also seems to have "forgotten" the documented antics of Andrew Jackson, the first DEMOCRAT president, FDR, JFK, LBJ, RFK, Ted Kennedy, and Gary Hart.

Perhaps Zippy never heard the rumors that were circulated about President James Buchanan and William Rufus King.

Zippy is such a dishonest (or poorly-informed) poster, isn't he?

Am I surprised that GBA conveniently forgets that the "dallience" with the young intern was CONSENSUAL and NOT sexual assault?

Of course I'm not surprised...he's more interested in whining about how wrong I am than he is in the truth.

[floridafan]

You don't see the difference between baseless allegations and the Clinton sex scandals? Seriously?

Most of the allegations against Clinton, were just that, allegations. yet it didnt stop you from convicting him without proof

[Русский агент]

Am I surprised that GBA conveniently forgets that the "dallience" with the young intern was CONSENSUAL and NOT sexual assault? Of course I'm not surprised...he's more interested in whining about how wrong I am than he is in the truth.

I don't recall claiming that it was an "assault", my little puppet.

Y O U, on the other hand, made this claim:

As is so very typical, the JPP conservative has the facts wrong. It wasn't Liberals who started this form of "campaigning". It was REPUBLICANS who first used women from the past to try and bring down Bill Clinton.

Nothing to say about the fact that I debunked your inaccurate statement?

Have you never heard the stories DEMOCRATS spread about Grover Cleveland and Maria Halpin?

Have you "forgotten" the documented antics of Andrew Jackson, the first DEMOCRAT president, FDR, JFK, LBJ, RFK, Ted Kennedy, and Gary Hart?

Have you never heard the rumors that were circulated about President James Buchanan and William Rufus King?

Obviously, "women from the past" have been widely used by both parties to "try and bring down" opposition candidates for over a century in American politics.

So, no, it wasn't "REPUBLICANS who first used women from the past to try and bring down Bill Clinton" or "started this form of campaigning".

You seem to be be ignoring that fact, Zappacrite.

[Русский агент]

Most of the allegations against Clinton, were just that, allegations. yet it didnt stop you from convicting him without proof

I don't recall convicting Blowjob Billy of anything personally, cum gargler.

Tell me, did you say that Roy Moore is a pedophile?

[zappasguitar]

Most of the allegations against Clinton, were just that, allegations. yet it didnt stop you from convicting him without proof

Of course these days the GOP and their TROLLS are busily engaged in revisionist history.

What are "unfounded allegations" when levelled against Roy Moore was "proof" that Clinton was guilty back during the Paula Jones/Juanita Broaddrick scandals.

All the GOP needed was Juanita Broaddrick's word to convince them Clinton was a rapist, but the accusations of multiple women regarding Roy Moore are nothing but unfounded hearsay.

[Русский агент]

Of course these days the GOP and their TROLLS are busily engaged in revisionist history. What are "unfounded allegations" when levelled against Roy Moore was "proof" that Clinton was guilty back during the Paula Jones/Juanita Broaddrick scandals. All the GOP needed was Juanita Broaddrick's word to convince them Clinton was a rapist, but the accusations of multiple women regarding Roy Moore are nothing but unfounded hearsay.

I seem to recall a time when you seemed to be possessed of some skepticism about conveniently-timed allegations.

"But you DON'T have a right to wait 20+ years, until it is politically advantageous, to raise your voice." A pity not a one of those women came forward AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED ASSAULT to make their claims.

[archives]

Is that so, anchovies?

Well for most, it is as clear as the nose on your face, for others as yourself, you don't get it, will never get it

[Русский агент]

Well for most, it is as clear as the nose on your face, for others as yourself, you don't get it, will never get it

Is that a fact, anchovies?

[zappasguitar]

Is that a fact, anchovies?

Oh WOW!

What biting wit!!

You sure got him that time!

[Русский агент]

Oh WOW! What biting wit!! You sure got him that time!

What I didn't get is a single example that might lend his claim any validity, Zappacrite.

Actually, the right wing media has been doing that for decades, except they wouldn't go as far as "holding news conferences," rather their tactic was to introduce an innuendo, and then "promote what ever" the innuendo implied "to denigrate the political opposition."

[MAGA MAN]

Most of the allegations against Clinton, were just that, allegations. yet it didnt stop you from convicting him without proof

You forgot the famous blue dress?

[MAGA MAN]

Actually the "Clinton sex scandals" were based on nothing but baseless, unfounded allegations.

Not a single charge was levied...not a single guilty plea was uttered.

And of course, due process mattered not to the GOP during their witch hunt

Blue dress.