Members banned from this thread: evince, toto, CFM, Troll and Tommatthews


Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 76

Thread: Liberal legal scholar Alan Dershowitz: There is absolutely no case for obstruction

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default Liberal legal scholar Alan Dershowitz: There is absolutely no case for obstruction


  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    26,791
    Thanks
    9,622
    Thanked 12,005 Times in 8,032 Posts
    Groans
    2,335
    Groaned 1,672 Times in 1,550 Posts

    Default

    Dershowitz is just another Trumptard ass licker.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Nomad For This Post:

    Phantasmal (12-04-2017)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,766
    Thanks
    102,677
    Thanked 55,155 Times in 33,858 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,083 Times in 4,699 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Dershowitz is just another Trumptard ass licker.
    I wouldn’t classify him as a liberal, either.

  5. The Following User Groans At Phantasmal For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-05-2017)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Covfefe View Post
    I wouldn’t classify him as a liberal, either.
    I’d classify him as a legitimate legal scholar.

    Like I’ve been saying, it’s not like the legal community is in unanimous agreement about the obstruction charge that may or may not even happen.

    The ruling could go either way...and if SCOTUS gets it, advantage Trump.

    Also like I’ve also been saying, an obstruction charge is Mueller’s fall-back indictment. His first intention is getting Trump on colluding with the Russians in the election.

    Failing that, Mueller goes fishing elsewhere. I’m sure he wouldn’t be happy with a crapshoot obstruction indictment on Trump—-much less, the tax payers who paid for it all.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    anatta (12-04-2017)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    22,675
    Thanks
    595
    Thanked 12,388 Times in 7,999 Posts
    Groans
    16
    Groaned 809 Times in 761 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    I’d classify him as a legitimate legal scholar.

    Like I’ve been saying, it’s not like the legal community is in unanimous agreement about the obstruction charge that may or may not even happen.

    The ruling could go either way...and if SCOTUS gets it, advantage Trump.

    Also like I’ve also been saying, an obstruction charge is Mueller’s fall-back indictment. His first intention is getting Trump on colluding with the Russians in the election.

    Failing that, Mueller goes fishing elsewhere. I’m sure he wouldn’t be happy with a crapshoot obstruction indictment on Trump—-much less, the tax payers who paid for it all.
    Hmmmmm- you're not suggesting that SCOTUS would make a decision based on politics, are you?

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2020.1 For This Post:

    Phantasmal (12-04-2017)

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    I’d classify him as a legitimate legal scholar.

    Like I’ve been saying, it’s not like the legal community is in unanimous agreement about the obstruction charge that may or may not even happen.

    The ruling could go either way...and if SCOTUS gets it, advantage Trump.

    Also like I’ve also been saying, an obstruction charge is Mueller’s fall-back indictment. His first intention is getting Trump on colluding with the Russians in the election.

    Failing that, Mueller goes fishing elsewhere. I’m sure he wouldn’t be happy with a crapshoot obstruction indictment on Trump—-much less, the tax payers who paid for it all.
    Why would the supreme court be involved in any charges against Trump?

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    26,791
    Thanks
    9,622
    Thanked 12,005 Times in 8,032 Posts
    Groans
    2,335
    Groaned 1,672 Times in 1,550 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    I’d classify him as a legitimate legal scholar.

    Like I’ve been saying, it’s not like the legal community is in unanimous agreement about the obstruction charge that may or may not even happen.

    The ruling could go either way...and if SCOTUS gets it, advantage Trump.

    Also like I’ve also been saying, an obstruction charge is Mueller’s fall-back indictment. His first intention is getting Trump on colluding with the Russians in the election.

    Failing that, Mueller goes fishing elsewhere. I’m sure he wouldn’t be happy with a crapshoot obstruction indictment on Trump—-much less, the tax payers who paid for it all.
    Funny how now you're calling him a legitimate legal scholar, but when Dershowitz was defending Bill Clinton, your side was deriding him as "Dershits".

    Trumptards.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nomad For This Post:

    christiefan915 (12-04-2017), Phantasmal (12-04-2017)

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post
    Hmmmmm- you're not suggesting that SCOTUS would make a decision based on politics, are you?
    Please lol.

    This whole charade is driven by politics.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    anatta (12-04-2017)

  15. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God bless America View Post
    This is what happens when the 'Russian collusion' well runs dry. All libs got was the very least (and easiest) conviction of all......making a false statement charge on Flynn. That's IT! So, now the intellectually constipated left have dreamed up yet another distractive witch hunt...obstruction.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  16. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,288
    Thanks
    3,870
    Thanked 5,011 Times in 3,467 Posts
    Groans
    1,286
    Groaned 494 Times in 452 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Douchowitz

  17. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    22,675
    Thanks
    595
    Thanked 12,388 Times in 7,999 Posts
    Groans
    16
    Groaned 809 Times in 761 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    This is what happens when the 'Russian collusion' well runs dry. All libs got was the very least (and easiest) conviction of all......making a false statement charge on Flynn. That's IT! So, now the intellectually constipated left have dreamed up yet another distractive witch hunt...obstruction.
    The bolded was friggin' awesome, though. To see the guy who led the "lock her up" chant getting led into court to the refrain of "lock him up?"

    Man, that was great. Worth every penny & then some.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2020.1 For This Post:

    christiefan915 (12-04-2017)

  19. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,766
    Thanks
    102,677
    Thanked 55,155 Times in 33,858 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,083 Times in 4,699 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    This is what happens when the 'Russian collusion' well runs dry. All libs got was the very least (and easiest) conviction of all......making a false statement charge on Flynn. That's IT! So, now the intellectually constipated left have dreamed up yet another distractive witch hunt...obstruction.
    You really don’t understand how these deals work, when you flip, they give you a deal, Flynn got a deal for his cooperation and information, not because that is all they had on him.

  20. The Following User Groans At Phantasmal For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-05-2017)

  21. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Compost View Post
    You really don’t understand how these deals work, when you flip, they give you a deal, Flynn got a deal for his cooperation and information, not because that is all they had on him.
    Liberal legal scholar Rana has spoken.

  22. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Covfefe View Post
    You really don’t understand how these deals work, when you flip, they give you a deal, Flynn got a deal for his cooperation and information, not because that is all they had on him.
    And, now it's over. Making a false statement was all they got. It's done. Plus, they could never put him in jury trial because anything he would ever say would not be credible. Win, win situation. No jail time for him, either. It's over. So, now we've moved on to hearing OBSTRUCTION being bandied about ad nauseum. Libs keep fishing, but the haul is not there and they keep cuttin' bait.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  23. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,766
    Thanks
    102,677
    Thanked 55,155 Times in 33,858 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,083 Times in 4,699 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    And, now it's over. Making a false statement was all they got. It's done. Plus, they could never put him in jury trial because anything he would ever say would not be credible. Win, win situation. No jail time for him, either. It's over. So, now we've moved on to hearing OBSTRUCTION being bandied about ad nauseum. Libs keep fishing, but the haul is not there and they keep cuttin' bait.
    He will get jail time, and probation, but not as much as if he had gone to trial. I can assure you that making a false statement is not all they had, it was all he is being charged with because he flipped. Just keep clicking those heels!

  24. The Following User Groans At Phantasmal For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-05-2017)

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    christiefan915 (12-04-2017)

Similar Threads

  1. Alan Dershowitz on the witch hunt
    By Stretch in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-20-2017, 12:54 PM
  2. Alan Dershowitz rips his own party apart
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 05-31-2017, 05:43 AM
  3. Alan Dershowitz Sees Civil Liberties Under Attack
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-21-2017, 01:01 PM
  4. Why Alan Dershowitz is Wrong about BLM
    By christiefan915 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-16-2016, 07:07 PM
  5. Seems Alan Dershowitz Has Had An Impact
    By Annie in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-09-2012, 02:33 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •