This run Alabama has been on is amazing so I take nothing away from them. I just don't like the fact they can play only 8 conference games then teams like Mercer in November and no league Championship game. The Committee is showing its advantageous to schedule weak opponents.
leaningright (12-03-2017)
The number of conference games means something. But not as much as you are claiming.
Alabama played 3 conference games against teams with losing records. Vandy, Arkansas, and TN. They ended the season with records of 5-7, 4-8, and 4-8 respectively.
Ohio State played 5 conference games against teams with losing records. Indiana, Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska, and Illinois. Those teams ended the season with records of 5-7, 4-8, 4-8, 4-8, and 2-10, respectively.
So you will excuse me if I don't act too impressed over their scheduling an extra 4-8 team and a 2-10 team.
In fact, Ohio State played 6 teams that ended up with a losing record. Alabama only played 4 teams with losing records.
Familiarity doesn't seem to have helped the bottom end of the teams OSU played. 4 of the teams they played (Indiana, Rutgers, Maryland, and Illinois) have sucked for years.
Both Maryland and Rutgers have had only 5 winning seasons out of the last 10. Half of the last decade they have lost more than they won.
But Indiana and Illinois would probably kill for that record. Illinois has only had 2 winning seasons in the last 10 years. And those were both 7-6 seasons. And Indiana? One of the conference games you put so much stock in? Has quite a streak going. 2017 marks the 10th consecutive losing season for the Hoosiers. They have lost 65% of their games over the last decade.
Last year Ohio State was given the benefit of and they got buried by Clemson,I think that was part of it
I have a old girlfriend lives in Ohio,she is a huge OSU fan.
Must be breaking her heart.
Hope she doesn't do something to herself
UCF Knights are undefeated
Bookmarks