Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 166 to 179 of 179

Thread: Fox says Flynn will testify Rump ordered him to break the law!

  1. #166 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Cite?
    It is obvious, so according to YOU, he doesn't need to cite you two faced liar.

  2. #167 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    With every passing day, it is Mueller's team and the Dems that look more corrupt.
    Really, is that what the polling data shows?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  3. #168 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    So you resort to trolling once you have been proven incorrect? Understood.
    What was I proven incorrect about? Thats what I thought!
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  4. #169 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    I see, so you got nothing! Gotcha!
    I'll remember you said this two faced liar.

    Saved Jarod cite

  5. #170 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    It is obvious, so according to YOU, he doesn't need to cite you two faced liar.
    What is obvious?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  6. #171 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    What is obvious?
    What he did. He doesn't need a cite, according to you. Two face. It is clear and obvious what he did.

  7. #172 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    What he did. He doesn't need a cite, according to you. Two face. It is clear and obvious what he did.
    What did he do?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  8. #173 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    What did he do?
    You continue asking this over and over again as if it hasn't been addressed already. If you are too lazy to read the articles then do shut your ass.

  9. #174 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    You continue asking this over and over again as if it hasn't been addressed already. If you are too lazy to read the articles then do shut your ass.
    I read the article all it says is that he was part of a group that drafted Comey’s letter, and sent a private text that might be construed as favoring HRC for president.

    Is that all you are bitching about?

  10. #175 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,104
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 806 Times in 671 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 326 Times in 306 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Your article said no such thing. Testify for what exactly? The President elects transition team transitioning? Get bent fucktard.

  11. #176 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,104
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 806 Times in 671 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 326 Times in 306 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    I read the article all it says is that he was part of a group that drafted Comey’s letter, and sent a private text that might be construed as favoring HRC for president.

    Is that all you are bitching about?
    No you dopey bitch Strzok not only co-wrote the exoneration letter written before the investigation was even complete, but he was personally responsible for the changing of the term "gross negligence" to "extreme carelessness" so as to avoid the exact language of the law.

    Furthermore; they can not be construed as anything the texts were overtly pro-Clinton and anti-Trump. The question is did Mueller inform Flynn's attorneys for the reason why Strzok was fired? If not Mueller is guilty of prosecutorial misconduct as it was Strzok who conducted the Flynn interview, also, he conducted the Clinton interview as well and was tasked with doing so by Andrew McCabe whose wife received nearly $700 thousand from Bill's BFF Terry McAuliffe.

  12. #177 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,643
    Thanks
    9,765
    Thanked 33,614 Times in 21,477 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PraiseKek View Post
    No you dopey bitch Strzok not only co-wrote the exoneration letter written before the investigation was even complete, but he was personally responsible for the changing of the term "gross negligence" to "extreme carelessness" so as to avoid the exact language of the law.

    Furthermore; they can not be construed as anything the texts were overtly pro-Clinton and anti-Trump. The question is did Mueller inform Flynn's attorneys for the reason why Strzok was fired? If not Mueller is guilty of prosecutorial misconduct as it was Strzok who conducted the Flynn interview, also, he conducted the Clinton interview as well and was tasked with doing so by Andrew McCabe whose wife received nearly $700 thousand from Bill's BFF Terry McAuliffe.
    Please tell me The contact of those texts?

    And why would Mueller be guilty of prosecutorial misconduct?

    Strzok was not fired!

  13. #178 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    I read the article all it says is that he was part of a group that drafted Comey’s letter, and sent a private text that might be construed as favoring HRC for president.

    Is that all you are bitching about?
    Like I stated, you are simply an ignorant troll. Either that are you are too ignorant to comprehend what you are reading. Which is it Garud?

  14. #179 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    What's your beef about somebody else doing what you claim you do?
    LOL Now you're playing the victim. Priceless.

Similar Threads

  1. Mike Flynn ‘prepared to testify against Trump and his family’
    By floridafan in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-01-2017, 11:16 PM
  2. APP - flynn offers to testify for immunity
    By Don Quixote in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-01-2017, 09:00 AM
  3. US Judge: Clinton may be ordered to testify in records case
    By TheDonald in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-05-2016, 04:49 AM
  4. Apple ordered to break into San Bernardino shooter's iPhone
    By RockX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-09-2016, 12:08 PM
  5. "Jackie" of Rolling Stone false rape scandal ordered to testify
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-22-2016, 11:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •