Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
First of all, I'm not on the witness stand and you're not an attorney. But, if someone accused you of being a pedophile and you said, "I am not a pedophile but I like being alone with little boys in dark rooms", it's not substantial proof but is sure is incriminating. Yeah, it's like that.
Comprende amigo?
BTW, go ahead and flatter yourself. But, don't do it too often. You'll go blind. BWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Then you should be able to show where he said "little" girls.
As to the content of your post, why don't you expand on what it appears you were trying to say; because combining your "little boys" comment with the one of "going blind", does seem to appear that you're trying to make an implication.
Last edited by USFREEDOM911; 12-04-2017 at 09:53 AM.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
That would be subjective to what each individual person considers this to be (age / upbringing / etc.) and is not something that can be a definitive answer; but you do seem intent on trying to get me to provide you with something that justifies your inability to prove this yourself.
This is a deflection; because what it is, is fact.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
I asked what YOU think, not each individual person. Every time you refuse to answer, it speaks volumes about your argument (or lack thereof).
So, once again, I'll ask: How old do you think girls are that make it appropriate to require their mother's permission to go out on a date?
And once again, if you refuse to answer, we'll know why.
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Nope! I'm actually not trying to get a specific answer. I just want an honest answer from you and not a deflection, pivot or diversion:
So, once again, I'll ask: How old do YOU think girls are that make it appropriate to require their mother's permission to go out on a date?
A simple number or numbers would suffice. Any other answer would substantiate a deflection, pivot or diversion and an unwillingness to answer the question.
Of course, I know you probably won't answer because we all know how damaging it would be to your argument. You've been painted into a corner and are trying to get out by responding with: That would be subjective to what each individual person considers this to be (age / upbringing / etc.) and is not something that can be a definitive answer which is such an obvious deflection, it's embarrassing. Once again, it's not about "each individual person". It's about what YOU think. Hopefully, you can comprehend that (but who knows. Maybe comprehension isn't your strong suit).
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”
Bookmarks