Members banned from this thread: Cypress, evince, Phantasmal, domer76, archives, Nomad and Micawber |
This is an arsehole free zone so the usual suspects are banned.
There was a consensus on cooling despite what others might tell you.
Massive Cover-up Exposed: 285 Papers From 1960s-’80s Reveal Robust Global Cooling Scientific ‘Consensus’
http://notrickszone.com/2016/09/13/m...fic-consensus/
Am I banned?
Just checking.
There was a concern from one Time article, long debunked.
Mkay you go girl.
lol the sunspot argument. No it is irrelevant. If anything it's fucking worse. If it's been cooler cuz' sunspots, wait till it gets warmer. lol. Further lets' look at the closer vs further spin of the Earth. There's a time in it's orbit when it's slightly closer than further away on those time paths of the planet. therefor all shuts stupid. Right? Wow, no clue about massive gas holding shit in. Good for you, you found the outlier of possibility of superficial effect but missed the fat chick of gas on your and my ass planet.
FUCKIT, don't change nothing. 1890 m technology refined is the only technology, fuck you all.
amirite?
You go with that.
While I make money on your stupidity.
Sorry but Richard Feynman would have a field day on all the cargo cult science produced by so called climate scientists. He would especially go to town over the use, or more accurately the misuse, of climate models. I suggest that you actually read what Feynman said about distinguishing between real science and pseudoscience. Perhaps if you read this you might learn how to do that.
https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/...ng-mr-feynman/
Bookmarks