Greenhouse gasses the ONLY cause of unprecedented global warming

[USFREEDOM911]

There is no debate with you or me to be had. It is a battle of experts. For us there is only a choice, select intelligently or stupidly.
You have selected the few outsiders with lesser and less relevant credentials and a specific interest group agenda and I the many with more relevant credentials in orthodoxy. That make me smart and you stupid.

That debate, the only one you and I can have, is settled.

Checkmate.

And yet you seem to be trying to convince someone or maybe just yourself.

[Micawber]

Why are you still debating this?

The article said it was "...extremely likely...", so it's settled; right?

It is settled the second every one of you climate change deniers in the world either sign a notorized affidavit admitting to your utter and wilful blissful stupidity
or sign on to each of the IGPCC reports adopting the content as the truth to the best of your knowledge.

[USFREEDOM911]

It is settled the second every one of you climate change deniers in the world either sign a notorized affidavit admitting to your utter and wilful blissful stupidity
or sign on to each of the IGPCC reports adopting the content as the truth to the best of your knowledge.

If it's settled, then why do you find the need to continue being stuck on it?

Shouldn't you be quietly sitting back and enjoying your victory?

[Micawber]

And yet you seem to be trying to convince someone or maybe just yourself.

Don't think I've not thankful for this trendline. Debating why I'm debating is getting close to you admitting I'm right. Better than blanket denial.
You are free to think whatever you want about climate science or any pivot angkle you'd care to fabricate. I will not be deterred in showing you
the water. I would never expect you to admit so here, but I am confident that when speaking with others you will do so having been apprised
of the facts from an other than Sean Hannity perspective.

[USFREEDOM911]

Don't think I've not thankful for this trendline. Debating why I'm debating is getting close to you admitting I'm right. Better than blanket denial.
You are free to think whatever you want about climate science or any pivot angkle you'd care to fabricate. I will not be deterred in showing you
the water. I would never expect you to admit so here, but I am confident that when speaking with others you will do so having been apprised
of the facts from an other than Sean Hannity perspective.

Now you seem unsure; because of your need to continue with something that is now "...extremely likely..."!!??!!

[Micawber]

If it's settled, then why do you find the need to continue being stuck on it?

Shouldn't you be quietly sitting back and enjoying your victory?

They didn't declare your state of mind was settled. I'm here to help you no matter how many views and camera angles are required.

[Micawber]

Now you seem unsure; because of your need to continue with something that is now "...extremely likely..."!!??!!

Someone who can't choose between the many, the gifted and the apprised over the biased, ignorant and mendacious is not to be trusted in assessment of my mental state.

[USFREEDOM911]

They didn't declare your state of mind was settled. I'm here to help you no matter how many views and camera angles are required.

I've already said that the matter must be settled; because they've declared it "...extremely likely...", but you continuing to belabor it is making me think that aren't sure.

[USFREEDOM911]

Someone who can't choose between the many, the gifted and the apprised over the biased, ignorant and mendacious is not to be trusted in assessment of my mental state.

Are you suggesting that I shouldn't trust you or the "...extremely likely..." conclusion??

[Minister of Truth]

Global warming threads are worthless without Tom.

[Micawber]

Global warming threads are worthless without Tom.

Others apparently don't value constant intentional lying like you do.

[domer76]

Global warming threads are worthless without Tom.

Shape Shifter, the cherry-picker?

[Phantasmal]

Global warming threads are worthless without Tom.

Well, you could help him out on his threads where he’s talking to himself.

[Micawber]

Are you suggesting that I shouldn't trust you or the "...extremely likely..." conclusion??

No, I am suggesting you are a moron. That was fairly direct.

[Minister of Truth]

Well, you could help him out on his threads where he’s talking to himself.

You mean where people concede all of his points and offer no rebuttal?