A Growing Volume Of Evidence Undercuts ‘Consensus’ Climate Science

[cancel2 2022]

The whole basis of science is that anything published should be checked out by the researchers' peers. A lot of amateur people seem to believe they can just know by simple faith that one thing is right, especially when it profits their masters. I don't know why they imagine their opinion is so important. God sends them messages perhaps?

I know you are intelligent, if a little misguided, so how can you ignore the fact that 400 peer reviewed papers have been published in 2017 alone? Why are you spouting such specious shite?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[cancel2 2022]

Who's blog were these guys papers published in?

If you are so intelligent then go to the websites and find out for yourself. Is that too hard for you, I'll understand if you can't.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[iolo]

I am no climatologist. I go by the decisions of those who are, as I do about most things scientific.

[cancel2 2022]

Where did Tinfoil get his degree from? His meth dealer?

He doesn't have formal qualifications, but he knows his shit.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[cancel2 2022]

I am no climatologist. I go by the decisions of those who are, as I do about most things scientific.

Ah yes, the good old appeal to authority. How many times have I heard that one? What you are really saying is it suits your Marxist beliefs to use CAGW as a backdoor to implementing full blown Socialism. If you were honest then you'd admit that, it is just another form of entryism like Momentum and the Militant Tendency before them.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[iolo]

Ah yes, the good old appeal to authority. How many times have I heard that one? What you are really saying is it suits your Marxist beliefs to use CAGW as a backdoor to implementing full blown Socialism. If you were honest then you'd admit that, it is just another form of entryism like Momentum and the Militant Tendency before them.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

It is obviously quite different from appealing to authority in the sense of power. If I want to know about plumbing I ask a plumber, not someone ranting down the boozer.

[cancel2 2022]

It is obviously quite different from appealing to authority in the sense of power. If I want to know about plumbing I ask a plumber, not someone ranting down the boozer.

Yes well I daresay you're pretty good at ranting down the boozer. The vast majority of those papers have been written by climate scientists but do carry on ranting, cocker!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[cancel2 2022]

Not so fast there.

I remember reading a couple of these articles but Legates puts it all together here.
It's well known that increased [CO2] causes increased temperature in a closed system, but what alarmists never mention is that increased temps in earth's ecosystem cause increase[CO2] which is also well known (you think about it, it's common sense).
This raises the age old question of which came first, the chicken or the egg? Or in regard to GW, does [CO2] follow T or does T follow [CO2]?
As to GW, the collection of articles with their empirical data answers that question.

(Disregard attachment, it's all in the link)

Legates know his shit!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[Nose Picker]

He doesn't have formal qualifications, but he knows his shit.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Confirmation bias. Check.

[Micawber]

He doesn't have formal qualifications, but he knows his shit.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Idiot voucher

[Micawber]

Yes well I daresay you're pretty good at ranting down the boozer. The vast majority of those papers have been written by climate scientists but do carry on ranting, cocker!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

You still have no science, stupid.

[cancel2 2022]

Confirmation bias. Check.

Is this yet another sock?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[tinfoil]

Why are there so many scientific morons on JPP? Apart from Damocles, Tinfoil and Mott, there are very few with any scientific credentials.

I don't have any scientific credentials. I'm just someone interested in the debate that took the time to try to really understand.

[tinfoil]

Where did Tinfoil get his degree from? His meth dealer?

LOL

[Cancel 2018.1]

And now one from this week refered from a less partisan study

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...026-story.html

That's not a study, it's a newpaper article about a study and the study referenced links sea level with increased GDP - in the future no less. Nothing empirical.