CLINTON, ASSANGE AND THE WAR ON TRUTH

[Русский агент]

distraction from WHAT??

Clinton gets to go around the world,make spurious charges, spread lies about her candidacy and the election
( and Assange and Libya) and a reporter is smart enough to call her out on it.

She injects herself into the news cycle as well..and the proper response is what?? stay moot? why?

Because weeping Thingy's feelings of sadness are triggered when you talk about Hillary.

[Русский агент]

They're both godawful bad, why can't you see that?
hrc and Trump were not your only choices.

They were the only two with a chance, and a vote for a third party might as well have been a vote for Hillary.

[Cypress]

Prove it, cunt face.

Your social skills are impeccable.

Ten thousand posts in three months, but zero dates in the last five years, am I right?

[christiefan915]

Cite the text from the linked articles that proves your claims, cunt face.

I'll understand if you can't.

Now, pretend that you don't need to. Hop to it.

You want me to post text that doesn't exist because no criticism was made about the women going on book tours.

Sorry vindictive sociopath, you lose again.

[dukkha]

too many threads are being derailed with this bullshit. you guys are ridiculous.

John Pilgeris an interesting guy- i signed up to follow him on Twitter

[Русский агент]

too many threads are being derailed with this bullshit. you guys are ridiculous.

John Pilgeris an interesting guy- i signed up to follow him on Twitter

Sorry, noise. Just having some fun humiliating a big-mouthed liar.

I'll stop.

[christiefan915]

You lie, cunt face. They were being criticized precisely because they went on book tours, and we both know it.

Now, deny that's the truth, as I continue to bend you to my will. Chop-chop.

No they were not, vindictive sociopath. Your ability to drill down on a small detail and use it as your entire argument just shows that you're a supporter of logical fallacies.

[christiefan915]

too many threads are being derailed with this bullshit. you guys are ridiculous.

John Pilgeris an interesting guy- i signed up to follow him on Twitter

Take it up with the vindictive sociopath, not me. I'm not the one following him around and calling him "cunt face" after every post.

[dukkha]

Take it up with the vindictive sociopath, not me. I'm not the one following him around and calling him "cunt face" after every post.

i see that. all I care about is yet another thread de-railed. It's becoming the norm here.

I'm seriously thinking this place is not worth the effort

[cancel2 2022]

Take it up with the vindictive sociopath, not me. I'm not the one following him around and calling him "cunt face" after every post.

He thinks that it is being cute and clever.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[cancel2 2022]

i see that. all I care about is yet another thread de-railed. It's becoming the norm here.

I'm seriously thinking this place is not worth the effort

I told him that he'd be banned in future!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[dukkha]

I told him that he'd be banned in future!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Thanks for the thread..I found it interesting and enlightening both

[cancel2 2022]

Here is an interview that John Pilger did with Julian Assange, fascinating stuff!

https://www.rt.com/news/365405-assan...ll-transcript/

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

[dukkha]

Here is an interview that John Pilger did with Julian Assange, fascinating stuff!

https://www.rt.com/news/365405-assan...ll-transcript/

Russian government not the source of Clinton leaks’

JP: The Clinton campaign has said that Russia is behind all of this, that Russia has manipulated the campaign and is the source for WikiLeaks and its emails.

JA: The Clinton camp has been able to project that kind of neo-McCarthy hysteria: that Russia is responsible for everything. Hilary Clinton stated multiple times, falsely, that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That is false; we can say that the Russian government is not the source

.why won't Meuller interview Assange? because he doesn't want to -simple as that.
He's got his narrative,and that's how he operates- to fulfill it

[cancel2 2022]

.why won't Meuller interview Assange? because he doesn't want to -simple as that.
He's got his narrative,and that's how he operates- to fulfill it

Meuller wasn't appointed to seek the truth, he's only interested in digging up dirt.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk