Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 80

Thread: SEVENTEEN + pages

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default SEVENTEEN + pages

    Seventeen + pages now and counting!

    That's how many pages the usual cadre of JPP trolls and Conservatives have been dodging a very simple question.

    All I wanted to know was if any JPP Trump supporter can explain to me why, if the women who accused Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault are to be believed,

    Then WHY are we ignoring the allegations of sexual assault leveled at President Cheeto von Combover a.k.a. President Trump?

    No one is thread banned, I'm not one of those pathetic chickenshits...ANYONE who thinks they can answer is welcome to try.

    I await your answers.
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ZappasGuitar For This Post:

    Phantasmal (10-20-2017)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,465
    Thanks
    16,662
    Thanked 20,736 Times in 14,331 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    How can they admit to the double standard? Maybe it would be better to ask them why the tragedy in Niger is any different than the tragedy in Benghazi?
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Seventeen + pages now and counting!

    That's how many pages the usual cadre of JPP trolls and Conservatives have been dodging a very simple question.

    All I wanted to know was if any JPP Trump supporter can explain to me why, if the women who accused Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault are to be believed,

    Then WHY are we ignoring the allegations of sexual assault leveled at President Cheeto von Combover a.k.a. President Trump?

    No one is thread banned, I'm not one of those pathetic chickenshits...ANYONE who thinks they can answer is welcome to try.

    I await your answers.
    I am not a Trump supporter per se, however I will take a shot. With Bill Clinton there is physical evidence and though not yet with Weinstein, there could be. Donald Trump so far there is no physical evidence.

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    I am not a Trump supporter per se, however I will take a shot. With Bill Clinton there is physical evidence and though not yet with Weinstein, there could be. Donald Trump so far there is no physical evidence.
    Thank you for taking a shot.

    correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe there was any physical evidence in any of the Clinton allegations.
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZappasGuitar View Post
    Thank you for taking a shot.

    correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe there was any physical evidence in any of the Clinton allegations.
    The dress? Or was that considered consensual.

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,389
    Thanks
    101,920
    Thanked 54,767 Times in 33,631 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    The dress? Or was that considered consensual.
    Monica, it was consensual, if I remember she even initiated the flirtation.

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,786
    Thanks
    35,471
    Thanked 50,286 Times in 27,094 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Covfefe View Post
    Monica, it was consensual, if I remember she even initiated the flirtation.
    From what I can tell, there are a lot of socially inept, resentful rightwing losers on the interwebs.

    And the concept of a woman pursuing them, and consenting to sexually explicit activities is probably completely outside the range of their life experience. My theory is that is a reason these losers conflate what Bill Clinton did with Monica, with what notorious sexual assaulters Roger Ailes, Bill O'Reilly, and Weinstein did.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Phantasmal (10-21-2017)

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Minister of Truth For This Post:

    Phantasmal (10-21-2017)

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Covfefe View Post
    Monica, it was consensual, if I remember she even initiated the flirtation.
    YEAH, kind of like that 13 year old girl who supposedly "initiated the flirtation" or so Hillary said, while defending the pedophile.

    I guess that makes Bill, not only a liar; but weak.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  14. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Русский  (10-21-2017)

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    Monica was 23, retard.
    Who the fuck said I was referring to Monica??

    Look back to 1975 and OOPS, my mistake the girl was 12; but the 1 year mistake made you think about Monica, HUH!!

    Now who looks like a retard!
    <rhetorical question; because the answer is you.>

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  17. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Русский  (10-21-2017)

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    Monica was 23, retard.
    Monica Lewinsky would give Billy Bob a BJ whilst he was talking with ambassadors and dignitaries. Not to mention compromising White House security!!


    Lewinsky came back to the White House from the Pentagon with the blue pass as a paid staffer.

    Monica confessed to Tripp that she had given oral sex to the president while he talked on the phone with ambassadors and other dignitaries.

    And she revealed to Tripp the details of the semen-stained blue dress still in her possession.

    'The staff kept aiding and abetting her and the president wanted her there,' Byrne writes.

    'President Clinton paid for a White House mistress with taxpayer funds and jeopardized national security with her compromising and corruptible presence in a secure area, all for little more than on-demand oral sex.

    'We thought we knew what was going on. We didn't know the half of it.

    'Had I never recommended that Monica needed to leave, Monica would have never met Linda.'

    And we would never have learned about the blue dress.

    The stewards were usually the first to discover traces of every secret sexual liaison at 1400 Pennsylvania Avenue.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-position.html


    Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    Русский  (10-21-2017), liberalsAREracists (10-21-2017)

  20. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  21. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    I might be movin to Montana
    Posts
    24,947
    Thanks
    7,072
    Thanked 10,611 Times in 7,328 Posts
    Groans
    68
    Groaned 1,966 Times in 1,782 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    Trumptards are hypocrites. That's all you really need to know about their reactions to Douchebag Donald versus Bubba Clinton and Harvey Weinstein.

    Ding Ding Ding!!

    We have a winner ladies and gentlemen!!
    What kind of country have we become?

    One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”

    and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-13-2016, 07:32 PM
  2. 1990 pages....
    By Cancel 2016.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-02-2009, 06:04 AM
  3. Seventeen punished
    By Canceled.LTroll.29 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 07:32 AM
  4. Blank Pages?
    By AHZ in forum Introductions, User Announcements, Suggestions and General Board Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 06-03-2008, 09:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •