Members banned from this thread: FUCK THE POLICE, evince, signalmankenneth, Buckly J. Ewer, Text Drivers are Killers, CFM, TheDonald, Bill, domer76, Amadeus, Silver Buzzard, BillyB, Mason Michaels, JqYaqui, ThatOwlWoman, PraiseKek and liberalsAREracists


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38

Thread: The myth of the Southern Strategy

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,236 Times in 13,962 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God bless America View Post
    He didn't mention Wikileaks, and the rest of your "rebuttal" lacks supporting documentation that would validate your assertions about the events you cited, anchovies.
    Really,"wiki can never be considered accurate on political issues," that's not mentioning Wikileaks?

    The documentation is the election maps, the actual history, I got to google them for you too? I thought you knew history, posting a history oriented topic, but it appears you don't, just another copy and paste I guess

    And if all you are going to do is deflect off the content of your topic post don't waste my time

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    What your point is missing, and the Narional Review article doesn't point out, is that Southern Democrats, especially post Civil War, were conservative Democrats, and the exact opposite for most Republicans, George Rommey and the Radical Republicans were not conservatives
    Now you're playing around with the historical definitions of conservative- totally meaningless in this discussion.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to MAGA MAN For This Post:

    Русский  (10-18-2017)

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Don't need Wikileaks, the 1964, especially the 1968, and 1980 elections on prove my point

    Before you ask 1972 and 1976 don't count since Nixon carried the country and in 1976 the Democrats ran Carter
    Wikipedia, not Wikileaks, as that was what you referenced. You do realize that the sole qualification to write or amend an article on Wikipedia is an internet connection, right?

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to MAGA MAN For This Post:

    Русский  (10-18-2017)

  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    Because the 1968 election doesn't fit your model, even the 1964 election makes it questionable, and every election after 1976 raises doubts Your study is based upon election results in the 1950s up to mid 1960's, learning from the 1968 election, the election you can't explain, Nixon bought the Southern Strategdy to the Republican Party
    So you say. Prove it. If you can.

    And again, it's not "my model, anchovies. Simple things seem to elude you.

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    For anymore deflections? Maybe a grammar or spelling error?
    You certainly provide ample fodder to support my suspicion that you are a quasi-illiterate, anchovies.


  7. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Right View Post
    Now you're playing around with the historical definitions of conservative- totally meaningless in this discussion.
    Anchovies is apparently an avid aficionado of bias confirmation fallacies.

  8. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default


  9. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    Really,"wiki can never be considered accurate on political issues," that's not mentioning Wikileaks?
    No, anchovies, it is not.

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    The documentation is the election maps, the actual history, I got to google them for you too? I thought you knew history, posting a history oriented topic, but it appears you don't, just another copy and paste I guess And if all you are going to do is deflect off the content of your topic post don't waste my time
    If you're going to make claims, either support them with evidence or accept the fact that they are opinions, anchovies.

  10. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God bless America View Post
    Anchovies is apparently an avid aficionado of bias confirmation fallacies.
    The whole "switched" theory of the two parties is sacrosanct for Democrats, so they will never, ever, admit the truth on this. To do so will blow their entire narrative sky high.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to MAGA MAN For This Post:

    Русский  (10-18-2017)

  12. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,236 Times in 13,962 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Right View Post
    Now you're playing around with the historical definitions of conservative- totally meaningless in this discussion.
    Not true, Party names only represent the ideology of the Party at that point in history, when conservatives regurgitate the lame narrative that the Democrat Party is the racist party based upon history is erroneous since the ideology of the Democrat Party then was conservative, which is not true today, did you really think Lincoln and the Radical Republicans were conservative?

  13. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Right View Post
    The whole "switched" theory of the two parties is sacrosanct for Democrats, so they will never, ever, admit the truth on this. To do so will blow their entire narrative sky high.
    Do the facts support their theory?

  14. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,236 Times in 13,962 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God bless America View Post
    No, anchovies, it is not.



    If you're going to make claims, either support them with evidence or accept the fact that they are opinions, anchovies.
    "Your failure to exhibit a rudimentary grasp of" American History "is compounded by your infantile refusal to accept the obvious"

    I can't teach you American History, seems you must have skipped out the last time someone else tried to do it, if you are too lazy to google simple election maps, your not really interested in exchanging content

    Bottom line is you have no clue about what you posted, you can't discuss it, and are wasting time with predictable deflections

    Next

  15. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,236 Times in 13,962 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Right View Post
    And your labeling of a picture LBJ with cherry picked quotes from who knows when proves what exactly?

  16. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Not true, Party names only represent the ideology of the Party at that point in history, when conservatives regurgitate the lame narrative that the Democrat Party is the racist party based upon history is erroneous since the ideology of the Democrat Party then was conservative, which is not true today, did you really think Lincoln and the Radical Republicans were conservative?
    The founders created a liberal republic which they codified in the Constitution. Modern conservatives are originalists: we adhere to the Founders principles of limited government and Rights granted to the People by their Creator, among these are all men are created equal. None of this supports your theory of Democrats believing that blacks are inferior because they were "conservative" in a very different sense of the word.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to MAGA MAN For This Post:

    Русский  (10-18-2017)

  18. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anchovies View Post
    "Your failure to exhibit a rudimentary grasp of" American History "is compounded by your infantile refusal to accept the obvious" I can't teach you American History, seems you must have skipped out the last time someone else tried to do it, if you are too lazy to google simple election maps, your not really interested in exchanging content Bottom line is you have no clue about what you posted, you can't discuss it, and are wasting time with predictable deflections Next
    It's not my responsibility to search for evidence to prove your assertions, anchovies.

    I acknowledge your admission of your abject failure to validate your position, anchovies.

  19. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    And your labeling of a picture LBJ with cherry picked quotes from who knows when proves what exactly?
    I didn't label the picture. It is sourced from NBRA.info. It proves that LBJ was a racist.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to MAGA MAN For This Post:

    Русский  (10-18-2017)

Similar Threads

  1. APP - The Myth of the Southern Strategy II
    By midcan5 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-24-2017, 11:22 AM
  2. APP - The Myth of the Southern Strategy
    By canceled.2021.3 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-22-2017, 06:52 AM
  3. Southren Strategy Myth: Not a Myth
    By Amadeus in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-21-2017, 09:35 AM
  4. Southern Man
    By ib1yysguy in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-10-2008, 08:08 PM
  5. How Come Southern Democrats are Just as Bad as Southern Republicans?
    By CanadianKid in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-27-2007, 06:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •