Have liberals ever taken a Civil class?

[evince]

will any of you be decent enough to FACE THESE COLD HARD FACTS?


I doubt it

[evince]

If they applied to the subject. Where many ordinary Americans, refer to the United States as a democracy. Others find this aggravating because, unlike in a democracy where citizens vote directly on laws, in the United States, elected representatives do – and, therefore, the U.S. is a republic, not a democracy. As I said many liberals are ignorant in civics and like you keep trying to sell the myth the US is a democracy!

YOU are mixing up the definitiions of several terms


democracy


pure democracy


direct democracy




the first one is not the same as the last two


the last two are the same


stop lying

[Huey]

there are NOT alternative facts.


we are a democratic republic


you dont get to pretend its your choice

words have set meanings.

Yes they do have meaning. Unfortunately, the first two times you mentioned democracy you failed to mention we are a representative republic following democratic principles. It wasn't until after this was pointed out to you that you decided to throw in republic. Many of the framers were afraid of pure democracy.

So yes, junior, words do have meaning.

[evince]

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/democracy



Definition of democracy
plural democracies
1
a :government by the people; especially :rule of the majority
b :a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections

post 37


did you ignore this FACT just like I thought you would?

[evince]

Yes they do have meaning. Unfortunately, the first two times you mentioned democracy you failed to mention we are a representative republic following democratic principles. It wasn't until after this was pointed out to you.

So yes, junior, words do have meaning.

fuck off russian lie bot


reread the definition of democracy by merriam websters you idiot russian.

[Huey]

post 37


did you ignore this FACT just like I thought you would?

Definition one.

The FED GOV is not a rule by majority. So what is your point?

[evince]

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dict...re%20democracy



Definition of pure democracy
:democracy in which the power is exercised directly by the people rather than through representatives

[Huey]

fuck off russian lie bot


reread the definition of democracy by merriam websters you idiot russian.

I did. We are not discussing the definition of a democracy. We are discussing the formation of the republic and a representative republic. You with us, loinfo?

[evince]

https://www.britannica.com/topic/direct-democracy



Direct democracy, also called pure democracy, forms of direct participation of citizens in democratic decision making in contrast to indirect or representative democracy, based on the sovereignty of the people. This can happen in the form of an assembly democracy or by initiative and referendum with ballot voting, with direct voting on issues instead of for candidates or parties. Sometimes the term is also used for electing representatives in a direct vote as opposed to indirect elections (by voting for an electing body, electoral college, etc.) as well as for recalling elected officeholders. Direct democracy may be understood as a full-scale system of political institutions, but in modern times, it means most often specific decision-making institutions in the broader system environment of representative democracy.

[evince]

you russin fucks want to KILL our democracy


its why you fucked with our elections


eat shit commrade


your shit aint going to stand

[Huey]

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dict...re%20democracy



Definition of pure democracy
:democracy in which the power is exercised directly by the people rather than through representatives

I guess next time you try and impress us with your knowledge you will choose you words cautiously. Since the country is NOT A PURE DEMOCRACY it is not relevant who wins the popular vote.

[evince]

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan...fraud-20130114



Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree
January 14, 2013|



WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.
The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”
The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

[Huey]

you russin fucks want to KILL our democracy


its why you fucked with our elections


eat shit commrade


your shit aint going to stand

LMAO! The dude is running out of steam.

You need to up your game, junior. You can save the insults. They have no effect on me.

[evince]

I guess next time you try and impress us with your knowledge you will choose you words cautiously. Since the country is NOT A PURE DEMOCRACY it is not relevant who wins the popular vote.

poor little russian doesnt understand whatw a democracy is


better go chop some more wood


your shitty performance is not going to get you transfered out of Siberia any time soon.

[evince]

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan...fraud-20130114



Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree
January 14, 2013|



WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.
The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”
The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

what did you say about this russian fucktard?