will any of you be decent enough to FACE THESE COLD HARD FACTS?
I doubt it
Yes they do have meaning. Unfortunately, the first two times you mentioned democracy you failed to mention we are a representative republic following democratic principles. It wasn't until after this was pointed out to you that you decided to throw in republic. Many of the framers were afraid of pure democracy.
So yes, junior, words do have meaning.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dict...re%20democracy
Definition of pure democracy
:democracy in which the power is exercised directly by the people rather than through representatives
https://www.britannica.com/topic/direct-democracy
Direct democracy, also called pure democracy, forms of direct participation of citizens in democratic decision making in contrast to indirect or representative democracy, based on the sovereignty of the people. This can happen in the form of an assembly democracy or by initiative and referendum with ballot voting, with direct voting on issues instead of for candidates or parties. Sometimes the term is also used for electing representatives in a direct vote as opposed to indirect elections (by voting for an electing body, electoral college, etc.) as well as for recalling elected officeholders. Direct democracy may be understood as a full-scale system of political institutions, but in modern times, it means most often specific decision-making institutions in the broader system environment of representative democracy.
you russin fucks want to KILL our democracy
its why you fucked with our elections
eat shit commrade
your shit aint going to stand
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan...fraud-20130114
Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree
January 14, 2013|
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.
The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”
The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.
Bookmarks