Originally Posted by
domer76
I already did, moron, but it escaped you. Your mistake, and the mistake that the moron you cited, is a logical fallacy. Pretty common among RW retards. You assume causality when it may well not exist.
I haven’t looked into the numbers, so I won’t even go there. Much of what you hacks post are outright fabrications.
Given that, increased numbers DON’T necessarily mean votes were NOT suppressed. Nor does it mean that the intention to suppress votes was absent. That’s why the courts routinely slap these laws down those laws.
Piss off a segment of the population enough, they will compensate by coming out in droves that didn’t occur before. Other votes can still be suppressed. And are.
Bookmarks