Have liberals ever taken a Civil class?

[ThatOwlWoman]

I keep seeing liberals claiming Hillary won because she got 3 million more votes! Don't they understand we elect the president by the candidate who get's the most Electoral College Votes?

I'll assume you're talking about a Civics class. Sadly for world decorum, civil classes are not offered any more.

Why yes, this liberal took one in 9th grade. It was mandatory for graduation, in fact. Perhaps you're mistaking "Hillary won the popular vote" for "Hillary won." Sorry. Next?

[domer76]

Not really. Clinton won Ca by over 4 million votes. Take that away and she loses the popular vote. Seems to me the system worked as designed. Under the popular system we would have a few heavy population centers and factions dictating the direction of the country.

lol

Get back to reality, pally. You want to play “take that away”? Great, let’s do that.

Orangetweet won the electoral vote with 77,000 votes in 3 states. Take that 77,000 away and he loses.

See how that works, pally?

[domer76]

You really are an idiot. I posted the ruling from political fact, moron. I does say exactly what I said. You are not a smart person.

That ruling says nothing about what those voter ID laws are intended to do. That the rate of turnout was higher does not mean that votes were not suppressed, either. You are merely making an assumption that may or may not be true.

[Abatis]

tell us why the founders created the electoral college asshole

To dilute and frustrate the momentary, ignorant whims of the majority.

[Abatis]

Im a chick

With a deep voice and vulgar disposition.

[Huey]

lol

Get back to reality, pally. You want to play “take that away”? Great, let’s do that.

Orangetweet won the electoral vote with 77,000 votes in 3 states. Take that 77,000 away and he loses.

See how that works, pally?

Not really. But I am sure glad we use the electoral college, pally, so that a few relatively small pockets of your whackjob progressives pallys aren't dictating policy to the rest of the country.

Those framers sure were smart.

UNDERSTAND how that works, pally? LMMFAO!

[Huey]

That ruling says nothing about what those voter ID laws are intended to do. That the rate of turnout was higher does not mean that votes were not suppressed, either. You are merely making an assumption that may or may not be true.

It is quite simple. There is no merit to the voter suppression argument concerning voter ID. When people want to vote they are able to vote. Simple as that.

[CFM]

lol

Get back to reality, pally. You want to play “take that away”? Great, let’s do that.

Orangetweet won the electoral vote with 77,000 votes in 3 states. Take that 77,000 away and he loses.

See how that works, pally?

He won and Hillary didn't. See how that works, BOY?

[CFM]

That ruling says nothing about what those voter ID laws are intended to do. That the rate of turnout was higher does not mean that votes were not suppressed, either. You are merely making an assumption that may or may not be true.

They aren't intended to do what you race pimps automatically go to when you don't like something.

Why can't black people get what white people are able to get without help?

[CFM]

I am as uncivil as hell to liars


its a public service

Is that what you call it when you kiss Obama's ass, a public service?

[CFM]

To dilute and frustrate the momentary, ignorant whims of the majority.

If she has to ask, it's more proof she doesn't understand the system in any way.

[MAGA MAN]

I always find that argument to be pretty lame. I have actually heard righties say "take away CA and NY, and the coasts, and Hillary wouldn't have even come close!"

Having a popular vote winner wouldn't change things that much; just where the candidates campaign. There is still House & Senate representation, as well as all of the local & state gov't influence. It's not like middle America would be forgotten.

People vote; dirt doesn't.

Your argument is lame. It's the United States of America, not the People's Republic of America.

[domer76]

It is quite simple. There is no merit to the voter suppression argument concerning voter ID. When people want to vote they are able to vote. Simple as that.

That's another RW lie that you bought hook, line and sinker.

[Huey]

That's another RW lie that you bought hook, line and sinker.

so you can explain how minority voter participation increased or remained in line with whites in states with voter ID laws in 06, 08, and 12.

thanks!

[CFM]

It is quite simple. There is no merit to the voter suppression argument concerning voter ID. When people want to vote they are able to vote. Simple as that.

The people lefties claim are being disenfranchised by voter ID are the same ones that don't have a bit of trouble getting the type ID needed to get social welfare.