Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Obamas DOJ was in the bag for Hillary

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default Obamas DOJ was in the bag for Hillary

    Long before the investigation into Hillary's emails was concluded Comey was already marching to his orders to clear her.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...-confirms.html
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Русский  (10-17-2017), Stretch (10-18-2017)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    If Jeff Sessions wasn't worthless he'd open an investigation into Comey because one is certainly warranted.

    And it would throw a wrench into Mueller's witch hunt at the same time.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Русский  (10-18-2017), MAGA MAN (10-18-2017), Stretch (10-18-2017)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Mr. Comey explain his actions long ago, asshole. Maybe you need to read!!!!!!!

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to floridafan For This Post:

    Phantasmal (10-18-2017)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    22,675
    Thanks
    595
    Thanked 12,388 Times in 7,999 Posts
    Groans
    16
    Groaned 809 Times in 761 Posts

    Default

    Still obsessed & whining, eh?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2020.1 For This Post:

    Phantasmal (10-18-2017)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cymru/'Wales'
    Posts
    8,017
    Thanks
    4,017
    Thanked 3,456 Times in 2,386 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 941 Times in 861 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    Long before the investigation into Hillary's emails was concluded Comey was already marching to his orders to clear her.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...-confirms.html
    That's why he fixed the election for Fart, eh? incidentally, I find it typical of the gross male-chauvinism of the USA that the racists and other extremists find it normal to call a person they've never even met - and hardly could except during an election - by her Christian name, as if they were old mates.

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Calls for Comey to return to Capitol Hill for questioning have mounted, including from Graham who said he would subpoena Comey if he had to.

    “He’s coming one way or the other,” Graham told Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” on Sept. 14.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Русский  (10-18-2017), Stretch (10-18-2017)

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,354
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,676 Times in 14,049 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iolo View Post
    That's why he fixed the election for Fart, eh? incidentally, I find it typical of the gross male-chauvinism of the USA that the racists and other extremists find it normal to call a person they've never even met - and hardly could except during an election - by her Christian name, as if they were old mates.
    Wouldn't it be more chauvinist to call her by her surname?

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,397
    Thanks
    72,428
    Thanked 35,740 Times in 27,222 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,587 Times in 18,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismis...ys_controversy



    On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6][7][8]
    A subsequent report by the Justice Department Inspector General in October 2008 found that the process used to fire the first seven attorneys and two others dismissed around the same time was "arbitrary", "fundamentally flawed", and "raised doubts about the integrity of Department prosecution decisions".[9] In July 2010, the Department of Justice prosecutors closed the two-year investigation without filing charges after determining that the firing was inappropriately political, but not criminal, saying "Evidence did not demonstrate that any prosecutable criminal offense was committed with regard to the removal of David Iglesias. The investigative team also determined that the evidence did not warrant expanding the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of Iglesias."[10]

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,397
    Thanks
    72,428
    Thanked 35,740 Times in 27,222 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,587 Times in 18,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Goodling resignation[edit]
    Main article: Monica Goodling
    Sampson's replacement as the Attorney General's temporary chief of staff was U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Chuck Rosenberg. Rosenberg initiated a DOJ inquiry into possibly inappropriate political considerations in Monica Goodling's hiring practices for civil service staff. Civil service positions are not political appointments and must be made on a nonpartisan basis. In one example, Jeffrey A. Taylor, former interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, tried to hire a new career prosecutor, Seth Adam Meinero, in the fall of 2006. Goodling judged Meinero too "liberal" and declined to approve the hire.[95] Meinero, a Howard University law school graduate who had worked on civil rights cases at the Environmental Protection Agency, was serving as a special assistant prosecutor in Taylor's office. Taylor went around Goodling, and demanded Sampson's approval to make the hire. In another example, Goodling removed an attorney from her job at the Department of Justice because she was rumored to be a lesbian, and, further, blocked the attorney from getting other Justice Department jobs she was qualified for.[96] Rules concerning hiring at the Justice department forbid discrimination based on sexual orientation.
    On March 26, 2007, Goodling, who had helped coordinate the dismissal of the attorneys with the White House, took leave from her job as counsel to the attorney general and as the Justice Department's liaison to the White House.[97][98] Goodling was set to testify before Congress, but on March 26, 2007, Goodling cancelled her appearance at the Congressional hearing, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.[99] On April 6, 2007, Ms. Goodling resigned from the Department of Justice.[97]
    On April 25, 2007, the House Judiciary Committee passed a resolution, by a 32–6 vote, authorizing lawyers for the House to apply for a court order granting Goodling immunity in exchange for her testimony and authorizing a subpoena for her.[100] On May 11, 2007, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Thomas Hogan signed an order granting Goodling immunity in exchange for her truthful testimony in the U.S. Attorney firings investigation, stating that "Goodling may not refuse to testify, and may not refuse to provide other information, when compelled to do so" before the Committee.[101]

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,218
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,218 Times in 13,952 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    Same worn topic, another focus, same conspiracy, merits saying again, anything to deflect away from rationalizing/defending their President, so predictable, as long as this Administration continues to blunder its way through the Clinton/Obama scapegoating obsession will never fade

    And before you start with the "they can't address my questions," your questions, conspiracies, and inneundos have been getting attention for nine years straight, we've had 24/7 right wing media coverage and umpteen redundant GOP investigations and yet nothing, zilch, zero has ever been proven. Either conservatives are the world's worst investigators, or, nothing existed to begin with, I think common sense dictates the later

    Besides, where would a good conservative be without there existential threat

  16. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    Long before the investigation into Hillary's emails was concluded Comey was already marching to his orders to clear her.


    Not only that - now we know that Obama's FBI and DOJ covered up Hillary's collusion with Putin, and some of the players in that cover-up are on Mueller's team:


    https://archive.is/K8XvP#selection-1971.0-1983.1

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cymru/'Wales'
    Posts
    8,017
    Thanks
    4,017
    Thanked 3,456 Times in 2,386 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 941 Times in 861 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    Wouldn't it be more chauvinist to call her by her surname?
    I call her Mrs Clinto, as I would address her. Don't you have any manners over there?

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    The truth will come out,

    the brain dead that still defend Obama and Clinton, the corruptness going on in the DOJ during the election was so bad it became almost surreal.

    Justice won however as Hillary was defeated, and so goes Obamas legacy with her.

    History will bare out just how despicable this team was top to bottom. What's left is to uncover is simply the details.
    And here they come.
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Русский  (10-18-2017), MAGA MAN (10-18-2017)

  20. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iolo View Post
    I call her Mrs Clinto, as I would address her. Don't you have any manners over there?
    Odd, since that's not her surname.

    What we don't have is centuries of subjugation by England. That's what the impotent Welsh have. Perhaps knuckling your foreheads to your masters on command is considered "mannerly" by the craven sons of St. Davy.

  21. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    3,429
    Thanks
    187
    Thanked 483 Times in 416 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 80 Times in 78 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    The truth will come out,

    the brain dead that still defend Obama and Clinton, the corruptness going on in the DOJ during the election was so bad it became almost surreal.

    Justice won however as Hillary was defeated, and so goes Obamas legacy with her.

    History will bare out just how despicable this team was top to bottom. What's left is to uncover is simply the details.
    And here they come.
    The truth is already out, but is being covered up by everyone, Trump included. Hillary put 100 percent of the State Depts business online for anyone who was looking to see. It was and is illegal, so if she is not under arrest by now she never will be

Similar Threads

  1. what if Obamas goes rouge?
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 12-08-2013, 02:25 PM
  2. Did Obamas pets do it again?
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-19-2013, 08:33 AM
  3. Obamas Oil Spill (Obamas Katrina)
    By Chapdog in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 05-11-2010, 11:49 AM
  4. Obamas war
    By Chapdog in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 12-01-2009, 01:04 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-06-2008, 06:57 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •