you don't get to say what other peoples interests are. Some people are legitimate serious about not being takers. Not everyone wants to live on their knees, like you do. Some people actually want to be free, and hold different values than you. Not everyone is looking for a handout or wanting to be a serf.
Not being able to buy across state lines was the single dumbest regulation of health insurance. It was indefensible, and that portion of the executive order, alone, will have a positive impact on coverage and premiums.
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
Life is Golden (10-14-2017)
True. That part applies to group coverage only but it's still good. Even relaxing the regulations on individual plans so young and healthier people have the option to buy catastrophic coverage without all the bells and whistles.
It's removing the subsidies without any option or direction whatsoever that concerns me.
By George you're a genius. Say it ain't so!
No shit, Sherlock. But Obama removed the underwriting part many years ago. This was the part of our insurance system which needed reform. Many people had the money to buy insurance but were denied, sometimes for ridiculous reasons. There should be SOME option.
Instead of the catastrophe called Obamacare, they could have formed some type of catastrophic pool for the uninsurable. The entirety of Obamacare was not needed to fix the most crucial pieces. Obamacare was designed with zero thought, however the response to fix it should be more thoughtful. It isn't a simplistic issue.
Bookmarks