Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 148

Thread: North Tower Exploding

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Some people did something.

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    620
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 54 Times in 51 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 11 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    This is a well-known video by David Chandler, prolific video maker for AE911truth:



    He says that the collapse front was preceded by a wave of explosions which cut the support columns, so that when the falling mass reached each story it encountered no resistance. Hence the collapse took place at or near "free fall". In so far as there is a truther theory of controlled demolition, this is it.

    How many separate explosive charges would have been required to do this? It's easy to calculate a ball-park figure without knowing anything about demolition technology, and as this is central to their claims I suppose some truthers must have done it. But no figure is mentioned in the video or anywhere in the truther opus that I know of. Can you see why they prefer to avoid it?

    Data:
    47 core columns
    240 perimeter columns
    70-80 stories up to the impact level.
    There is a lot of convincing evidence that the towers were detonated with skilled accuracy. I believe funny business went on and we can't merely take the reports on word.

    Now, the question remains... Why? For what reasons?

  3. The Following User Groans At Part Multi 313 For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-18-2019)

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Part Multi 313 For This Post:

    Controlled Opposition (05-15-2019)

  5. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Part Multi 313 View Post
    There is a lot of convincing evidence that the towers were detonated with skilled accuracy
    ... Why? For what reasons?
    Please cite your best evidence that the towers were detonated. It doesn't have to be a lot, just well-founded. Thanks.

    As to who did it and why, the most popular theory is that the Bush-Cheney gang did it or had it done. They pinned it on 15 Saudis, 2 Emiratis, a Lebanese and an Egyptian so they had an excuse to invade Iraq. (Can you spot a possible flaw there?)

    Other suggestions: Israel, the New World Order, Grand Fenwick.

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053084/

  6. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    In the 2016 election campaign Donald Trump promised to reveal the Truth about 9/11 after he was elected.

    It went the same way as his tax returns. It must have been under audit.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Tranquillus in Exile For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (01-12-2022)

  8. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    88,275
    Thanks
    145,680
    Thanked 82,496 Times in 52,724 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,657 Times in 4,376 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    In the 2016 election campaign Donald Trump promised to reveal the Truth about 9/11 after he was elected.

    It went the same way as his tax returns. It must have been under audit.
    I'm still laughing about Grand Fenwick in the previous post.
    "Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to ThatOwlWoman For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (01-12-2022)

  10. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 832 Times in 791 Posts

    Default

    Actually, if you bother to actually study the design of the WTC buildings, you'd understand why they collapsed.



    And, no, these buildings weren't designed to take a hit from a large aircraft, any more than the Empire State Building was in December 1944 when that B-25 accidently flew into it.

  11. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    In the 2016 election campaign Donald Trump promised to reveal the Truth about 9/11 after he was elected.
    "You Will Find Out Who Really Knocked Down The World Trade Center."
    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...me_saudis.html

    Then he shocked everybody by being elected, and not a word about 9/11 since!

    Trump has never been known to make false promises, so … who got to him?

  12. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,662
    Thanks
    6,591
    Thanked 12,127 Times in 9,658 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    it was obviously a controlled demolition.

    lets talk about wtc 7.


    A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7
    Project Info
    Lead Researcher(s)
    J. Leroy Hulsey
    Project Team
    Feng Xiao, Associate Professor, Nanjing University of Science and Technology
    Zhili Quan, Bridge Engineer, South Carolina Department of Transportation
    Project Dates
    May 1, 2015 - December 31, 2019

    Funding
    Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
    Project Budget: $316,153

    Final Report
    Download Final Report
    A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 (March 2020)

    Simulations and Videos
    Figure 4.16
    Hypothetical Failure of Columns 76 to 81



    Figure 4.17a
    Near-Simultaneous Failure of All Columns, Perspective 1



    Figure 4.17a
    Video of WTC 7 Collapse, Perspective 1



    Figure 4.17b
    Near-Simultaneous Failure of All Columns, Perspective 2



    Figure 4.17b
    Video of WTC 7 Collapse, Perspective 2



    Draft Report
    A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 (September 2019)

    Public Comments (September to November 2019)

    Open Data
    All input data, results data, and simulations that were used or generated during this study can be downloaded as a ZIP file:

    Download UAF WTC 7 Files (zip | 256 GB)
    Please be advised that the size of this ZIP file is 256 GB and that, after unzipping the file, the size of the folder containing all of the files is 632 GB. Therefore, downloading the ZIP file and unzipping it will require approximately 900 GB of storage space.

    Presentations
    A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 presentation by Dr. Leroy Hulsey on September 3, 2019 at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.




    Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 presentation by Dr. Leroy Hulsey on September 6, 2017 at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

    Progress Reports
    WTC7 Progress Report (September 2017)

    WTC7 Progress Statement (March 27, 2018)

    Project Summary


    This is a study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) — a 47-story building that suffered a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001, following the horrible events of that morning. The objective of the study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

    The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

    The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.


    https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

    CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Hermes Thoth For This Post:

    Controlled Opposition (07-17-2022)

  14. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,662
    Thanks
    6,591
    Thanked 12,127 Times in 9,658 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I was newly separated from my first wife the morning of sept 11, 2001.

    she called me crying and she didn't know why.

    she's very sensitive.

  15. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    it was obviously a controlled demolition.
    Were the Twin Towers brought down by controlled demolition?

    Take a look at the OP and the posts following it. Get back to us with your solution. Thanks.


    P.S. Hi, C.O.! Feel free to join in.

  16. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,662
    Thanks
    6,591
    Thanked 12,127 Times in 9,658 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    Were the Twin Towers brought down by controlled demolition?

    Take a look at the OP and the posts following it. Get back to us with your solution. Thanks.


    P.S. Hi, C.O.! Feel free to join in.
    i believe so, yes.

    and there was no plane at the pentagon either.

  17. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,734
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 98 Times in 94 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 41 Times in 39 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    i believe so, yes.

    and there was no plane at the pentagon either.
    Since it's bungling GI Joe biding his "serve the Pope or die" time of Islamidiotocracy problems in American politics can't be bothered, especially these Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate fiefdom drug trafficking enforcement interpretation of "one nation under God with equal justice under law" capitalism of Nazi economics with their national religion of thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament arsonists more perfect union with Islam "death to the infidels" thieving flying carpets as if they were Muhammeds' flying flaming chariot for 9/11....

  18. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,734
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 98 Times in 94 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 41 Times in 39 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    i believe so, yes.

    and there was no plane at the pentagon either.
    Just like there were no West Nazi Germany Virginia KKK thieving US Constitution burned on a cross arsonists that killed a Navy hospital doctor in 1971 30 years earlier.....while there was no Islam flying carpet Muhammed flaming chariot for 9/11 at the Pentagon.....in that Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate fiefdom drug trafficking enforcement Christiananality pedophilia tradition of baptize thine eyes of a Washington, D.C. born retired Pentagon staff sergeant to Ike in Rehnquist's Fourth Reich July malice aforethought....

  19. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,352
    Thanks
    4,237
    Thanked 10,167 Times in 7,083 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,196 Times in 1,111 Posts

    Default

    Science was never one of Conspiracy Theorists best subjects!

    Skyscraper structural engineers on the mainstream media were able to call this one accurately and within minutes after the towers collapsed!

    I remember them calling it the domino effect that day!

    All it took was those support girders to melt down and soften just enough to cause the floor above to fall, which was too much weight for that floor to support, and thus started the domino effect all the way down to the basement level! The jet took out most of the support girders on, at least, two of the floors and the fire's incredible heat did the rest!

    Even Captain Obvious could have called this one!

    Last edited by Geeko Sportivo; 07-17-2022 at 07:12 PM.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Geeko Sportivo For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (07-17-2022)

  21. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    7,950
    Thanks
    5,865
    Thanked 4,108 Times in 3,183 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 137 Times in 133 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Geeko Sportivo View Post
    Science was never one of Conspiracy Theorists best subjects!

    Skyscraper structural engineers on the mainstream media were able to call this one accurately and within minutes after the towers collapsed!

    I remember them calling it the domino effect that day!

    All it took was those support girders to melt down and soften just enough to cause the floor above to fall, which was too much weight for that floor to support, and thus started the domino effect all the way down to the basement level! The jet took out most of the support girders on, at least, two of the floors and the fire's incredible heat did the rest!

    Even Captain Obvious could have called this one!

    Are you a structural engineer?

Similar Threads

  1. Liberals heads exploding in 3 - 2 - 1
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-18-2016, 01:51 PM
  2. Voter fraud exploding across Virginia... act surprised
    By Celticguy in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 10-03-2016, 07:59 PM
  3. Advisory; To Teabaggers: You're Expected To GIVE-AWAY Exploding-Cigars!
    By Mr. Shaman in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-19-2016, 09:09 AM
  4. Hear that? It's Runes head exploding.
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-28-2012, 04:42 AM
  5. Lies of Plutocracy: Exploding Five Myths that Dehumanize the Poor
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-27-2012, 08:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •