The aussies certainly do have an avid crew of climate science deniers. If you need to find some tailor made lies against climate science, you need look no further than to Austrailia or Big Oil funded think tanks. It wasn't evident the last time I visited
the great barrier reefs and Sydney and the Blue Mountains, etc.....
You are truly misinformed and unwilling to see beyond your carefully constructed shelter from inconvenient facts. I doubt if you've even heard of the CLOUD experiment, Jasper Kirkby or CERN.
https://home.cern/about/updates/2016...te-predictions
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
He deals with sound bytes, not facts. He enjoys hype, not the reality of it. If he actually bothered to read or comprehend what you are saying he would realize you are not denying it. Just putting it into the proper perspective and time frame.
And pointing out, clearly and accurately, that most of the hype has been based on unreliable and unrepeatable data, i.e, the most unscientific way of determining anything.
Yet he claims to be vastly superior to us mere mortals, not only that, his father is an actual rocket scientist! You are absolutely right, he never says anything of substance preferring to just indulge in spouting well worn shibboleths and cliches.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Today, 03:14 PM
Sailor
Verified User
This message is hidden because Sailor is on your ignore list.
Today, 03:49 PM
Corazón
Insane Level of Addiction
This message is hidden because Corazón is on your ignore list.
Today, 04:00 PM
Sailor
Verified User
This message is hidden because Sailor is on your ignore list.
Today, 04:08 PM
chink
Member
This message is hidden because chink is on your ignore list.
Today, 04:38 PM
Corazón
Insane Level of Addiction
This message is hidden because Corazón is on your ignore list.
Thread salvtion bump
"Extreme heat that would be considered unusual today could become a yearly occurrence there by mid-century, one new study suggests, and the trend will emerge earlier there—and in the rest of the tropics—before it does in more temperate areas, another finds.
The studies, both detailed this month in the journal Environmental Research Letters, emphasize the undue burden that some of the poorest populations on the planet—often those that have contributed least to global warming—will face from climate change, the authors say."
Scientific American.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...hotter-future/
Hi Africa! Love and kisses from white Repuke America who want to put the kabash on climate science knowledge and accountability for fucking you in the ass. Enjoy!
The scientific article??????....(wink, wink) offered as evidence and SUGGESTED by those pretending to be working with applied science (in the demonstrable fact as proof they use subjective language and proceed as if OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE has been presented by their opinionated conjectures)..... is a FALSE PREMISE, that premise being the suggestion that the POOR do not contribute as much as the wealthy to the supposed CARBON pollution emissions.
Reality? In Truth 48% of the world's poor developing nations contribute to the supposed evil that is CARBON emissions causing the supposed green house effect, soon that 48% will be 51% in overtaking the wealthy nations as the greatest threat to our LMAO climate. (in fact all biological life on earth depend upon carbon for its very continued existence as all life on earth is carbon based....its not poison as suggested by the tree hugging leftists) and Global Warming...my bad, the new buzz word is CLIMATE CHANGE ......is cyclical in nature just as are our SEASONS. And the greatest determiner of those Global seasons? THE SUN, not mankind. Its more than pompous to suggest that man has the power to effect the climate so much he can adjust it by adjusting his lifestyle.....its PAGANISTIC and EVIL...i.e., just another tool used by the left to usurp political power for personal gain....its who they are, its how they work, just ask Saul Alinsky.
Look at the article presented as SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. How many lines of evidence are laced with conjectural and subjective language terms (anything but scientific).....words such as suggests, could, considered, etc., with the idiotic closing line by the one presenting it as SCIENCE claiming it to be proof as REAL SCIENCE. What this proves is the fact of this posters ignorance or dishonesty....or both.
Last edited by Ralph; 10-17-2017 at 03:24 PM.
Great article on the GWPF website about this subject.
http://www.thegwpf.com/the-third-wor...-climate-scam/
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Bookmarks