Breaking News.....the Russians COULD NOT HAVE INFLUENCED THE ELECTION

[Ralph]

I am still waiting for your proof for your link, honey bunch. So far all we have is a whole lot of bullshyte and a woman who doesn't know what fascism is.

Right....I am supposed to do your leg work in proving that the democrats don't have a history of fascism? Its your charges (they don't have a history of Jim Crow, KKK, Anti civil rights voting..etc.) ...you prosecute them. You will not because you cannot. Laugh My Ass Off. I am supposed to prove YOUR NEGATIVE? Another left wing ploy...because you can't defend the LIES you have presented. Again.....explain how the Saudis are helping Donald Trump get elected by helping his family promote capitalism 5 months after Trump took office.

DEFLECTION: The act of attempting to deflect your argument to another because the original argument can't be defended.

[Русский агент]

Did Crooked Hillary get any $ from foreign donors before the election?

Let's see...


Recent donors include the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Australia, Germany and a Canadian government agency promoting the Keystone XL pipeline. . . .

United Arab Emirates, a first-time donor, gave between $1 million and $5 million in 2014, and the German government—which also hadn't previously given—contributed between $100,000 and $250,000.

A previous donor, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, has given between $10 million and $25 million since the foundation was created in 1999. Part of that came in 2014, although the database doesn't specify how much.

The Australian government has given between $5 million and $10 million, at least part of which came in 2014. It also gave in 2013, when its donations fell in the same range.

Qatar’s government committee preparing for the 2022 soccer World Cup gave between $250,000 and $500,000 in 2014. Qatar’s government had previously donated between $1 million and $5 million.

Oman, which had made a donation previously, gave an undisclosed amount in 2014. Over time, Oman has given the foundation between $1 million and $5 million. Prior to last year, its donations fell in the same range.

The foundation of course provides luxury travel for Hillary Clinton and her spouse, a high-visibility platform and access to mega-donors. She is beholden in a meaningful sense to its donors. No presidential candidate can justify a conflict of interest of this magnitude; it is not merely the appearance of conflict but actual conflict of interest.

It is bad enough when Clinton takes gobs of money in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, oil and chemical companies, and other titans of industry — although that, too, raises the potential for conflicts of interest.

A foreign government should never have any claim on the loyalty of a U.S. president, which is why foreign donations directly to a campaign are illegal. We cannot give her a pass simply because her entity is a “foundation,” not a PAC or campaign entity.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/02/18/foreign-donations-to-hillary-clintons-foundation-raise-major-ethical-questions/?utm_term=.fa254c9e7c8a

[Русский агент]

Oh, my.


It was supposed to be a carefully planned anniversary to mark one of the most widely praised moments in Hillary Rodham Clinton’s political career — and to remind the country, ahead of a 2016 presidential campaign, about her record as a champion for the rights of women and girls.

Instead, she finds herself under attack for her acceptance of millions of dollars in donations from Middle Eastern countries known for violence against women and for denying them many basic freedoms.



https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/09/us/politics/hillary-clinton-faces-test-of-record-aiding-women.html

[Русский агент]

Oh, dear.


The Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.

The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the story involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men who have been major donors to former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

The sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a number of United States government agencies.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, records show a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.

Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

[floridafan]

"explain how the Saudis are helping Donald Trump get elected by helping his family promote capitalism 5 months after Trump took office"

Its called buying influence honey pot, just like what you accused Mrs Clinton of with donations to her charity. As usual you are completely FOS. NOW, document the $100 million you accused Obama of accepting. You know you can't because it never happened.

[Русский агент]

"explain how the Saudis are helping Donald Trump get elected by helping his family promote capitalism 5 months after Trump took office" Its called buying influence honey pot, just like what you accused Mrs Clinton of with donations to her charity. As usual you are completely FOS. NOW, document the $100 million you accused Obama of accepting. You know you can't because it never happened.

I accused Crooked Hillary of nothing, durian dumpling, and I didn't say "the Saudis are helping Donald Trump get elected by helping his family promote capitalism 5 months after Trump took office".

[Cancel 2018.1]

If its documented post it or maybe a link- like this one

Saudis And The UAE Will Donate $100 Million To A Fund Inspired By Ivanka Trump

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...y-ivanka-trump

I didn't realize Ivanka was sect. of state. Investigate!

[floridafan]

You don't think that donating a $100 million to the presidents daughter is not buying influence. Is there anything, absolutely anything that you won't do to defend trump?

[domer76]

Yup it's true, it is impossible for the Russians to have influenced the last election because of the electoral college. Simple really, see you did not vote, or your votes meant nothing because Trump was elected by the electoral college, not the people. Why? this was designed to prohibit tampering and it worked wonderfully.

Thanks George...................

Next

Wrong again, idiot. Only 77,000 had to be influenced.

10,000 in Michigan
22,000 in Wisconsin
46,000 in Pennsylvania

That was the difference. All 0.8% margin or less.

How one can be so easily mislead and chronically wrong is astounding.

[domer76]

I am still waiting for your proof for your link, honey bunch. So far all we have is a whole lot of bullshyte and a woman who doesn't know what fascism is.

Ralph is a rambling, senilic moron. What's the new word? Dotard.

You'll get bogged down in his non-sensical drivel if you allow it.

[TheDonald]

Wrong again, idiot. Only 77,000 had to be influenced.

10,000 in Michigan
22,000 in Wisconsin
46,000 in Pennsylvania

That was the difference. All 0.8% margin or less.

How one can be so easily mislead and chronically wrong is astounding.

So you are saying that the Russians put a gun to 77,000 Americans heads.....................LOL

Take your pills

[domer76]

So you are saying that the Russians put a gun to 77,000 Americans heads.....................LOL

Take your pills

I didn't say that at all, you illiterate fuck. I said the premise of your post is bullshit.

Votes = electoral college.

[Русский агент]

[TheDonald]

I didn't say that at all, you illiterate fuck. I said the premise of your post is bullshit.

Votes = electoral college.

So now you are claiming that the Russians influenced 77,000 members of the electoral college.............

Whew, you need shots pronto

Try heroin in the eyeballs

[domer76]

[QUOTE=TheDonald;2039157]So now you are claiming that the Russians influenced 77,000 members of the electoral college.............

Whew, you need shots pronto

Try heroin in the eyeballs[/QUOTE

Congrats on moving to the number one spot on the Illiterate List, dumbfuck.

Go back to grade school and bitch slap the teacher that failed to teach you reading comprehension.