Русский (09-08-2017)
I don't live on the coast for several reasons, one of which is the likelihood of getting personal and real property wiped out by ocean storms. And frankly, I'm rather tired of having my tax dollars used to rebuild overpriced ocean-front property that I choose not to own, again and again.
At the least, I think if FedCo writes checks for destroyed property, then it should own the property and let it revert back to nature, and become a buffer for properties that are better sited.
Русский (09-08-2017)
or maybe an even better solution would be to reduce and/or limit the taxation that the feds do to the people and let the states handle their own emergency funds for natural disasters. Then, maybe, the states could impose more rigid and strict legislation on the insurance companies that deny coverage to these property owners via some idiot clause
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
I think that's a good idea too, but politically would never happen. Interior states will rightly benefit, but the heavily populated coasts will prevail at the voting booth.
With my idea, we use the Left's biggest weapon against them: sustainability, environmental impact, etc.
Русский (09-08-2017)
So now it is the left that owns all those properties you are complaining about? If I'm not mistaken, the President himself owns one, in addition to a couple of radio demogogues who often remind us where they live
Actually I partially agree with you, if you take the risk you should live with the consequences, flood insurance is a good example, everyone else paying to keep insurance rates low
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Русский (09-08-2017)
Русский (09-08-2017)
Excellent suggestion.
Let the funds that liberals have mentally earmarked for reparations be used to purchase all coastline property in the continental US, and ask Trump to declare those lands a National Park in perpetuity.
Makes sense from a number of vantage points.
Have you read "Waves & Beaches" by Willard Bascom, the renowned engineer? An expert exposition of the dynamics and description of ocean/beach interaction and the folly of the building/rebuilding cycle. He proposed a moratorium on coastline structures back in 1979.
https://www.amazon.com/Waves-Beaches.../dp/0385148445
Русский (09-08-2017)
Русский (09-08-2017)
Русский (09-08-2017)
Русский (09-08-2017)
Bookmarks