Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 77

Thread: The Polls in the 2016 election were ACCURATE

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,625
    Thanks
    65,445
    Thanked 38,188 Times in 25,723 Posts
    Groans
    5,817
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    If I were a polling company I would put up fake polls the whole time to help push my narrative then just put one real one at the end. After all you are only judged on the last poll.

    Funny how all polls tighten towards election day.
    Why am I not surprised you'd support something so dishonest?


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    Why 2016 election polls missed their mark

    The results of Tuesday’s presidential election came as a surprise to nearly everyone who had been following the national and state election polling, which consistently projected Hillary Clinton as defeating Donald Trump. Relying largely on opinion polls, election forecasters put Clinton’s chance of winning at anywhere from 70% to as high as 99%, and pegged her as the heavy favorite to win a number of states such as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin that in the end were taken by Trump.

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...ed-their-mark/

    4 Possible Reasons The Polls Got It So Wrong This Year

    http://www.npr.org/2016/11/14/502014...rong-this-year

    Great thread Jarod!!!
    Proof Jarod and Thingy are morons.

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cancel 2018.2 For This Post:

    BRUTALITOPS (08-21-2017), Truth Detector (08-22-2017), Wolverine (08-22-2017)

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Why am I not surprised you'd support something so dishonest?
    should i show u podestas dnc playbook email for slanting the polls?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26551

  5. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    Proof Jarod and Thingy are morons.
    its like they r thinking hillary actually won

    bizarre

  6. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Despite popular opinion, the polling numbers, almost all came in within the Margin of Error.

    There was some dramatic shifting in the week before the vote, but if you take the election day numbers they almost all were within the Margin of Error...
    I was one of the first people after the election to say that the polls were pretty close, it was peoples interpretation of the polls that was off. That is still true of JPP largely.

    However some state polls very much undervalued trump. I think Ohio and obviously michigan and PA were off a bit.

    Additionally it's one thing to be inside of the margin of error but when you are on the wrong side of the margin of error in like every single state that might speak to a broader problem with some of the methodology. States like florida and NC are not the same as Michigan, so the correlation shouldn't be as strong.

    The main takeaway though is you are a huge fucking retard that should never even consider talking about polling or stats.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    Русский  (08-21-2017)

  8. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    The problem is most people are very bad at inherently understanding probabilities. A 30% chance coming to fruition does not mean a poll was "wrong" - we can expect 30% to happen very frequently. In the weeks leading up the election I said very distinctly that trumps chances of winning were better than the cubs chances of winning when they were down 3-1, and yet I talked to multiple retards on here saying it was literally impossible for trump to win. These idiots literally denied the existence of statistically probability, they couldn't fathom it. Much of this history of JPP delusions has been retconned and forgotten though. Jarod will continue to make the same mistake next time though and learn nothing. If trump is 20% to win in 2020 jarod will say trump can't win. He will literally make the exact same mistake next time. book it.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    Русский  (08-21-2017)

  10. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    You see, a 70% chance means there is a 30% chance on the other side, and if the 30% chance happens the poll was not necessarily wrong.

    See how that works?
    lol fucking idiot, you are literally a year behind on this. Maybe you should have read my posts last year and you would have learned something.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    Русский  (08-21-2017)

  12. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post
    The OP is correct. It's a myth that the polls were "way off" this year - especially the national polls.

    Hillary won the popular vote by 2%, which was right in line w/ most polls. Historically, pretty close to the norm.
    I remember specifically telling you that if the national polls were under 3% than a whole host of possabilities of trump winning were on the table and you were having none of it. I love it now that liberal polling chumps like you all of a sudden think you are experts, given how stupid you were last year on the matter. November 5th you still said it was impossible for trump to win. The internet does not forget.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    Русский  (08-21-2017), Cancel 2018.2 (08-21-2017)

  14. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    National polling will always be better than state polling, as state polling is closer to the ground and harder for polling companies to have accurate regular polling of all swing states. There will be more variance with state polls because of this. National polling only tells us so much about electoral politics given we don't have a national election.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    Русский  (08-21-2017)

  16. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    10,119
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 17 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tarpon View Post
    So the polls that said Donald Trump had a zero percent chance of victory were correct.

    Time to take your pills kid
    Polls don't say things like that...analysts do.
    The polls were within their stated margins of error...
    Your argument is with punditry not polls.
    USFREEDOM911 Expresses one of his homosexual prison rape fantasies;
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    he may be getting several boners, they just won't be his.
    "You got shot in the balls and you're still walking!! Then this probably won't hurt you at all (as he unzips his pants)."




    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I would kill someone who didn't pay me, after I give them a blowjob.
    Does that make me insane?

  17. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    22,675
    Thanks
    595
    Thanked 12,388 Times in 7,999 Posts
    Groans
    16
    Groaned 809 Times in 761 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Literal Vampire Potbelly Goblin View Post
    I remember specifically telling you that if the national polls were under 3% than a whole host of possabilities of trump winning were on the table and you were having none of it. I love it now that liberal polling chumps like you all of a sudden think you are experts, given how stupid you were last year on the matter. November 5th you still said it was impossible for trump to win. The internet does not forget.
    Are you really attempting to talk down to me after the past 6 months+ of swallowing everything Trump is feeding you whole and being one of his most ardent apologists?

    How marvelous.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2020.1 For This Post:

    christiefan915 (08-22-2017)

  19. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    20,584
    Thanks
    5,584
    Thanked 2,435 Times in 2,073 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 172 Times in 170 Posts

    Default



    1:07 anybody who says the polls were within the margin of error is kidding themselves


  20. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post
    Are you really attempting to talk down to me after the past 6 months+ of swallowing everything Trump is feeding you whole and being one of his most ardent apologists?

    How marvelous.
    I accept your concession


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-22-2017)

  22. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,288
    Thanks
    3,870
    Thanked 5,011 Times in 3,467 Posts
    Groans
    1,286
    Groaned 494 Times in 452 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    People on the Right keep saying they were not accurate as justification for saying they are not currently accurate.
    They were not accurate no matter how much you want to believe. The bias was documented. Fivethirtyeight has a list of the bias scores if you google it.

  23. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,319
    Thanks
    13,309
    Thanked 40,976 Times in 32,291 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by I condemn racists & Nazis View Post


    he thinx if he keeps saying the polls were right and clix his heels 3 times the wicked witch will be magicked in 2 the white house
    Hilliary was the wicked witch underneath Trump's house.......Jarod's her sister and has flying monkies in the media......

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 82
    Last Post: 05-28-2017, 11:50 PM
  2. Can the 2016 election be rigged? You bet
    By Robo in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 10-12-2016, 04:20 PM
  3. What are the polls and Intrade showing for the 2016 race?
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-08-2012, 11:12 AM
  4. Are JPP polls ever accurate?
    By BRUTALITOPS in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-25-2010, 02:55 PM
  5. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-08-2006, 12:17 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •