Top general says the NYT leaked info on ISIS

[cancel2 2022]

A top US general has blamed leaks to the New York Times for giving ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi the ability to evade American forces seeking to kill him.

General Raymond 'Tony' Thomas, who leads Special Operations Command, said Friday at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado that his teams were 'particularly close' to al-Baghdadi after a 2015 raid, Fox News reported.

That operation, a Delta Force commando raid in eastern Syria, killed ISIS oil minister Abu Sayyaf and captured his wife, yielding a trove of information about the terror group's operations and logistics.

'That was a very good lead. Unfortunately, it was leaked in a prominent national newspaper about a week later and that lead went dead,' said Thomas, in an apparent reference to a New York Times report about the raid from June 2015.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-s-escape.html

[anatta]

top general says LEAKS to the New York Times are the reason ISIS leader al-Baghdadi escaped US forces and is likely still alive

General Tony Thomas has blamed leakers for the apparent survival of ISIS leader
Says US and allies have killed 60,000-70,000 ISIS soldiers in Iraq and Syria
But leader al-Baghdadi apparently remains alive despite conflicting reports
Now Thomas blames 2015 New York Times report for giving away US advantage

A top US general has blamed leaks to the New York Times for giving ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi the ability to evade American forces seeking to kill him.

General Raymond 'Tony' Thomas, who leads Special Operations Command, said Friday at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado that his teams were 'particularly close' to al-Baghdadi after a 2015 raid, Fox News reported.

That operation, a Delta Force commando raid in eastern Syria, killed ISIS oil minister Abu Sayyaf and captured his wife, yielding a trove of information about the terror group's operations and logistics.

'That was a very good lead. Unfortunately, it was leaked in a prominent national newspaper about a week later and that lead went dead,' said Thomas, in an apparent reference to a New York Times report about the raid from June 2015.

The New York Times report even detailed knowledge gained about al-Baghdadi's security precautions for meeting and communicating with his lieutenants, including the use of wives to pass messages.

'The challenge we have [is] in terms of where and how our tactics and procedures are discussed openly,' Thomas said.

'There's a great need to inform the American public about what we're up to. There's also great need to recognize things that will absolutely undercut our ability to do our job,' he continued.

President Donald Trump seized on the remarks early Saturday morning, tweeting: 'The Failing New York Times foiled U.S. attempt to kill the single most wanted terrorist,Al-Baghdadi.Their sick agenda over National Security'.

The New York Times did not immediately respond to a request for comment from DailyMail.com.
President Donald Trump seized on Thomas' remarks, tweeting about them Saturday morning

President Donald Trump seized on Thomas' remarks, tweeting about them Saturday morning

Thomas offered a 'conservative' estimate that US forces and allies had killed 60,000 to 70,000 ISIS fanatics, saying of al-Bagdadi that 'everyone who worked for him initially is dead or gone'.

Meanwhile, amid conflicting reports last month that Russian forces had killed al-Baghdadi, US Defense Secretary James Mattis has said he believes the ISIS leader is still alive.

'I think Baghdadi is alive, I think he's alive and I'll believe otherwise when we know we've killed him,'

Mattis told Pentagon reporters on Friday.

'We are going after him, but we assume he is alive.'

Asked whether al-Baghdadi still plays a command role in ISIS, Mattis mused: 'To define that role, is it operational? Is it strategic? Is it propaganda? Is it spiritual? Is it physical? I can't define it, but until I see his body, I'm going to assume he is alive.'

There have been persistent rumors that Baghdadi has died in recent months.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a longtime conflict monitor, last week said it had heard from senior IS leaders in Syria's Deir Ezzor province that Baghdadi was dead.
last week, a top Kurdish counter-terrorism official claimed he is alive and hiding in Syria.

Lahur Talabany said he was 99 per cent sure that al-Baghdadi is still in the group's de-facto capital of Raqqa, Syria.

He said: 'Don't forget his roots go back to al-Qaeda days in Iraq. He was hiding from security services. He knows what he is doing.'

Talbany also warned that despite recent setbacks and loss of territory, ISIS is preparing for a 'different fight' and will soon be an 'Al-Qaeda on steroids'.

He added: 'They are getting ready for a different fight I think. We have a lot tougher days ahead of us than people think.

'We saw why they were smarter. Al Qaeda never controlled any territory. They will be smarter.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-s-escape.html

[anatta]

assholes

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Now leaks are bad, who would've thought?

[Cancel 2018.2]

Now leaks are bad, who would've thought?

Who would have thought you think it is a good thing the NYT helped him evade US forces, dummy ISIS supporter.

[Darth Omar]

I love that Trump is brash enough to call their agenda 'sick'.

[anatta]

Now leaks are bad, who would've thought?

when were leaks ever good??
idiot.

[anatta]

I love that Trump is brash enough to call their agenda 'sick'.

ya good for him, but you can't compete with Fake News -it's what they do

[Rune]

assholes

nice thread hijack cuntface.

[anatta]

there have been persistent rumors that Baghdadi has died in recent months.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a longtime conflict monitor, last week said it had heard from senior IS leaders in Syria's Deir Ezzor province that Baghdadi was dead.
last week, a top Kurdish counter-terrorism official claimed he is alive and hiding in Syria.

he's got more lives then a cat

[anatta]

nice thread hijack cuntface.

so you hijack a thread to tell me I'm hijacking a thread -
even though my comment was pertinent to the behavior of the NYTimes??

You've become a pathetic characterization of even your own stupidity. congrats.

[Cancel 2018.2]

nice thread hijack cuntface.

More drunkass irony.

GFY drunktard.

[cancel2 2022]

nice thread hijack cuntface.

I am trying to be civil with you but I also expect you to show some civility towards Anatta in my thread.

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Who would have thought you think it is a good thing the NYT helped him evade US forces, dummy ISIS supporter.

Who would've thought it was a good idea to leak something far more damaging, that caused the fascist takeover of the US and the loss of all our freedoms? Clearly, an evil person. I'll give the NYT a pass, what they did was not nearly as evil as what wikileaks did.

[Cancel 2018.2]

Who would've thought it was a good idea to leak something far more damaging, that caused the fascist takeover of the US and the loss of all our freedoms? Clearly, an evil person. I'll give the NYT a pass, what they did was not nearly as evil as what wikileaks did.

LMAO, yeah that's it. Comparing the the two is exactly it.

You're an idiot, bar none.