Cadillac Man (07-23-2017), Callinectes (07-23-2017), Rune (07-22-2017)
I am NEUTRAL on this issue. I truly do not care one way or the other.
KEEP IT - There may be a few problems with it, but it is overall a positive feature for JPP
GET RID OF IT - It may have it have a few benefits, but it's overall a negative feature for JPP
KEEP IT - The threadban feature must be kept, it is awesome
GET RID OF IT - The threadban feature must go, it is terrible.
RESULTS
(For future reference):
The poll formally ended on 7/27/17
Majority clinched a day or two earlier
_____________________________
SUMMARY
* Threadbanning is a feature that allows one to selectively ban people from threads they create.
* If you are semi-new and still don't have a fully formed opinion on the matter, you can read this thread: (https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-new-poll-soon) which has a decent amount of discussion about it.
* This poll will be open for 7-14 days. I want everyone to have the opportunity to vote. Walls might be spammed O_O
* If the vast majority of people vote rather quickly it may be closed earlier.
* If the vote appears to be an obvious runaway it may be closed earlier.
* Unlike last time, VOTE WILL BE ANONYMOUS, even after votes are in. That way, if you wanna be two-faced and claim you hate threadbanning but secretly you want to support it, you will be allowed to do so. The mod team will not out you.
* We might however provide general stats if people are interested, and in the name of transparency.
RULE TIME
Rule 1 - Only those on the following list are allowed to vote -
DO NOT VOTE IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN ACCOUNT ON THE BELOW LIST, as you may be banned for an unspecified amount of time:
If you have multiple accounts, you don't have to vote under the specific account name listed above, but make sure you only vote once. We aren't a DNC precinct.
Rule 2 - DO NOT multi-vote
Multi-voting may lead to a ban of an unspecified length. If you end up voting twice on different names because you are a retard and can't help yourself, let us know before we find out on our own.
Sorry to make a simple vote so unnecessarily grandiose but a lot of you are idiots and really need your hand held.
Last edited by BRUTALITOPS; 07-27-2017 at 02:05 PM.
Cadillac Man (07-23-2017), Callinectes (07-23-2017), Rune (07-22-2017)
I know this is a poll for long-termers, and I accept that.
Still, if I may, let me suggest another option: Keep the feature, but - software allowing - drop it in the War Zone. It's ridiculous.
Cancel 2018.1 (07-21-2017)
I accidentally voted ten times, by mistake. Sorry, Grind...
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
Cadillac Man (07-23-2017), Phantasmal (07-21-2017), Rune (07-22-2017)
Peridot (07-21-2017), Phantasmal (07-21-2017)
I cannot promise this.The mod team will not out you.
BRUTALITOPS (07-21-2017), Rune (07-22-2017)
So far with 14% of the vote cast, Keep is running away with it.
My suggestion:
Keep it if you must, but a) limit the number of posters that can be pre-banned from a given thread and b) if it's a "call-out" thread (about a specific member) disallow banning that member so that they can respond.
C'MON MAN!!!!
Truth Detector (07-22-2017), USFREEDOM911 (07-24-2017)
I'm really torn, I generally don't like it, yet, it is a must for Buckly.
I shall contemplate this some more.
BRUTALITOPS (07-21-2017), Truth Detector (07-22-2017)
Rune (07-22-2017)
Bookmarks