View Poll Results: What should JPP do with its threadban feature?

Voters
46. You may not vote on this poll
  • I am NEUTRAL on this issue. I truly do not care one way or the other.

    10 21.74%
  • KEEP IT - There may be a few problems with it, but it is overall a positive feature for JPP

    10 21.74%
  • GET RID OF IT - It may have it have a few benefits, but it's overall a negative feature for JPP

    7 15.22%
  • KEEP IT - The threadban feature must be kept, it is awesome

    15 32.61%
  • GET RID OF IT - The threadban feature must go, it is terrible.

    4 8.70%
Page 1 of 20 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 286

Thread: THREADBAN POLL 2017 (READ THREAD B4 VOTING - BANS POSSIBLE IF YOU DONT READ RULES)

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    37,992
    Thanks
    6,847
    Thanked 16,127 Times in 9,731 Posts
    Groans
    1,013
    Groaned 1,442 Times in 1,294 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default THREADBAN POLL 2017 (READ THREAD B4 VOTING - BANS POSSIBLE IF YOU DONT READ RULES)

    RESULTS
    (For future reference):

    The poll formally ended on 7/27/17
    Majority clinched a day or two earlier

    Quote Originally Posted by Literal Vampire Potbelly Goblin View Post

    44 total legitimate votes

    24 in favor
    11 against

    9 neutral
    2 dumbasses that can't read the rules.
    12 people that did not vote
    _____________________________

    SUMMARY


    * Threadbanning is a feature that allows one to selectively ban people from threads they create.

    * If you are semi-new and still don't have a fully formed opinion on the matter, you can read this thread: (https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-new-poll-soon) which has a decent amount of discussion about it.

    * This poll will be open for 7-14 days. I want everyone to have the opportunity to vote. Walls might be spammed O_O

    * If the vast majority of people vote rather quickly it may be closed earlier.

    * If the vote appears to be an obvious runaway it may be closed earlier.

    * Unlike last time, VOTE WILL BE ANONYMOUS, even after votes are in. That way, if you wanna be two-faced and claim you hate threadbanning but secretly you want to support it, you will be allowed to do so. The mod team will not out you.

    * We might however provide general stats if people are interested, and in the name of transparency.

    RULE TIME

    Rule 1 - Only those on the following list are allowed to vote -

    DO NOT VOTE IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN ACCOUNT ON THE BELOW LIST, as you may be banned for an unspecified amount of time:

     

    Amadeus
    aloysious
    althea
    anatta
    archives
    Bigdog
    Bill
    blackascoal
    Buckly J. Ewer
    Cadillac Man
    callinectes
    Cawacko
    Celtic Guy
    Capt Billy
    CFM
    christiefan
    Cypress
    Damocles
    Darth Omar
    Domer76
    evince
    GazzaQueen
    Getin the ring
    Granule
    Grind
    I Love America
    iolo
    Jarod
    leaningright
    Lovebug
    Micawber
    Mott the Hoople
    Mr.Badguy
    Nomad
    NOVA
    postmodernprophet
    Ralph
    Rana
    Right
    Rune
    Sailor
    signalmankenneth
    Smarterthanyou
    Stretch
    Text Drivers are Killers
    TheDonald
    Thing1
    Threedee
    Tom Prendergast
    Trump Diva
    Truth Detector
    TTQ64
    tsuke
    usfreedom
    Watermark
    Yaya
    ZappasGuitar


    If you have multiple accounts, you don't have to vote under the specific account name listed above, but make sure you only vote once. We aren't a DNC precinct.

    Rule 2 - DO NOT multi-vote

    Multi-voting may lead to a ban of an unspecified length. If you end up voting twice on different names because you are a retard and can't help yourself, let us know before we find out on our own.

    Sorry to make a simple vote so unnecessarily grandiose but a lot of you are idiots and really need your hand held.
    Last edited by Stardawg; 07-27-2017 at 03:05 PM.
    Biography:

    Grind is one of the internets most beloved and influential political thinkers and deep-level theorists in the modern era. He rose to prominence in early 2015 when he alleged, contrary to the dominant theory of christiefanism of the time, that Bill Clintons wife was indeed running for president and wasn't considering settling down to be a grandmother. In 2016, Grind was one of the key figures in proposing the new revolutionary theory of "30% is not a rare occurrence" which shook up the JPP political landscape like no other theory ever had before. His academic prowess, deep-level analysis and remarkable insight into human nature and psychology will undoubtedly result in further complexities being untangled and laid bare. He currently resides in boston, his hobbies include #rekking libs, vaping, and patriotism. You can find him in a thread near you.

    Testimonials about my patented system:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stardawg For This Post:

    Cadillac Man (07-23-2017), Callinectes Ocasio-Cortez (07-23-2017), Rune (07-22-2017)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    268
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 261 Times in 141 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 22 Times in 19 Posts

    Default

    I know this is a poll for long-termers, and I accept that.

    Still, if I may, let me suggest another option: Keep the feature, but - software allowing - drop it in the War Zone. It's ridiculous.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Owl'd You're Up! For This Post:

    Cancel 2018.1 (07-21-2017)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    59,385
    Thanks
    16,250
    Thanked 15,515 Times in 11,617 Posts
    Groans
    623
    Groaned 1,041 Times in 987 Posts

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bull Durham For This Post:

    Cadillac Man (07-23-2017), Phantasmal (07-21-2017), Rune (07-22-2017)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    37,992
    Thanks
    6,847
    Thanked 16,127 Times in 9,731 Posts
    Groans
    1,013
    Groaned 1,442 Times in 1,294 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    I accidentally voted ten times, by mistake. Sorry, Grind...

    Biography:

    Grind is one of the internets most beloved and influential political thinkers and deep-level theorists in the modern era. He rose to prominence in early 2015 when he alleged, contrary to the dominant theory of christiefanism of the time, that Bill Clintons wife was indeed running for president and wasn't considering settling down to be a grandmother. In 2016, Grind was one of the key figures in proposing the new revolutionary theory of "30% is not a rare occurrence" which shook up the JPP political landscape like no other theory ever had before. His academic prowess, deep-level analysis and remarkable insight into human nature and psychology will undoubtedly result in further complexities being untangled and laid bare. He currently resides in boston, his hobbies include #rekking libs, vaping, and patriotism. You can find him in a thread near you.

    Testimonials about my patented system:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stardawg For This Post:

    Peridot (07-21-2017), Phantasmal (07-21-2017)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,107
    Thanks
    560
    Thanked 1,031 Times in 698 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 24 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    The mod team will not out you.
    I cannot promise this.

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    75,702
    Thanks
    31,640
    Thanked 21,019 Times in 16,362 Posts
    Groans
    22,411
    Groaned 3,648 Times in 3,468 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Owl'd You're Up! View Post
    I know this is a poll for long-termers, and I accept that.

    Still, if I may, let me suggest another option: Keep the feature, but - software allowing - drop it in the War Zone. It's ridiculous.
    You need to talk to Damocles as he wrote the code.
    In rejecting their view [Spinoza, Leibnitz and Hegel], as I shall contend that we must, we are committing ourselves to the opinion that “truth” in empirical material has a meaning different from that which it bears in logic and mathematics.”

    Bertrand Russell, “An Inquiry Into Meaning & Truth” (1940)

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    45,467
    Thanks
    58,547
    Thanked 25,653 Times in 16,863 Posts
    Groans
    1,938
    Groaned 2,547 Times in 2,385 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferdinand Mannlicher View Post
    I cannot promise this.
    It's a private poll, can you do that?
    kag: to choke something down in disgust

    Keep America Gagging

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,107
    Thanks
    560
    Thanked 1,031 Times in 698 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 24 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Covfefe View Post
    It's a private poll, can you do that?
    We can see who voted how behind the scenes.

    Or do you mean morally?

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peridot For This Post:

    Rune (07-22-2017), Stardawg (07-21-2017)

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    30,167
    Thanks
    1,375
    Thanked 5,800 Times in 4,713 Posts
    Groans
    745
    Groaned 2,445 Times in 2,268 Posts

    Default

    So far with 14% of the vote cast, Keep is running away with it.

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    45,467
    Thanks
    58,547
    Thanked 25,653 Times in 16,863 Posts
    Groans
    1,938
    Groaned 2,547 Times in 2,385 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferdinand Mannlicher View Post
    We can see who voted how behind the scenes.

    Or do you mean morally?
    Morally
    kag: to choke something down in disgust

    Keep America Gagging

  16. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    14,815
    Thanks
    5,038
    Thanked 7,063 Times in 4,620 Posts
    Groans
    1,085
    Groaned 956 Times in 884 Posts

    Default

    My suggestion:

    Keep it if you must, but a) limit the number of posters that can be pre-banned from a given thread and b) if it's a "call-out" thread (about a specific member) disallow banning that member so that they can respond.

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    8,873
    Thanks
    384
    Thanked 2,859 Times in 2,211 Posts
    Groans
    308
    Groaned 182 Times in 176 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    My suggestion:

    Keep it if you must, but a) limit the number of posters that can be pre-banned from a given thread and b) if it's a "call-out" thread (about a specific member) disallow banning that member so that they can respond.
    Sorry this is a poll about keeping it or letting it go. You retards don't get to dictate terms trying to water it down.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to QuidProJoe For This Post:

    Truth Detector (07-22-2017), USFREEDOM911 (07-24-2017)

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    5,166
    Thanks
    1,138
    Thanked 2,495 Times in 1,799 Posts
    Groans
    7
    Groaned 171 Times in 164 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Owl'd You're Up! View Post
    I know this is a poll for long-termers, and I accept that.

    Still, if I may, let me suggest another option: Keep the feature, but - software allowing - drop it in the War Zone. It's ridiculous.
    I voted neutral but I agree with this.

  20. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,408
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I'm really torn, I generally don't like it, yet, it is a must for Buckly.

    I shall contemplate this some more.

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cancel 2018.2 For This Post:

    Stardawg (07-21-2017), Truth Detector (07-22-2017)

  22. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,107
    Thanks
    560
    Thanked 1,031 Times in 698 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 24 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Covfefe View Post
    Morally
    Well now you've ruined it, but it was a joke.

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Peridot For This Post:

    Rune (07-22-2017)

Similar Threads

  1. READ THE RULES
    By Stardawg in forum Announcements
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 09-12-2013, 06:47 AM
  2. test (dont read)
    By Stardawg in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-16-2007, 12:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •