You want evidence of presidential collusion with Russia? Here it is!!!

[(o,o)]

Press outlets are now reminding us that President Bill Clinton interfered in the 1996 Russia election that brought Boris Yeltsin to power for a second term.

However, there is another piece to the 1996 Clinton op, and it is explosive and quite relevant. Let’s start here, with the 1996 leak of a document detailing a meeting between Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin.


“According to a White House memo in March 1996, Clinton and Yeltsin had agreed to support each other in their respective reelection bids.”


We are talking about mutual interference. President Clinton helps President Yeltsin win, and President Yeltsin helps President Clinton win.


Bill Clinton asked the president of Russia to interfere in a US presidential election.

Digest that.


The Washington Post reports on “a memo written by Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, according to White House press secretary Michael McCurry. It recounted talks between Clinton and Yeltsin earlier this month when both leaders attended an anti-terrorism summit in Egypt. The memo said Clinton pledged to work with Yeltsin to maintain ‘positive’ relations with the United States as both men seek reelection this year. One way to do this, the memo quoted Clinton as saying, is for Yeltsin to stop restricting poultry imports. Clinton said ‘this is a big issue, especially since 40 percent of U.S. poultry is produced in Arkansas,’ the memo said.”


We had a US president, Bill Clinton, specifying HOW the Russian president could help him win a second term as US president.


Let that sink in.



http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/07...#disqus_thread

[Getin the ring]

Don't expect any of these loons to touch this one, but I appreciate it just so you know,

they are too wrapped up in tin foil hat whining conspiracy

[Mr.Badguy]

Sigh, if you really need someone to tell you how this is different then you're too far gone as it is. But fine, I'd be willing to condemn both Clinton and Trump. Will any of you condemn either?

[(o,o)]

Sigh, if you really need someone to tell you how this is different then you're too far gone as it is. But fine, I'd be willing to condemn both Clinton and Trump. Will any of you condemn either?

Condemn? Sure, that's easy.

I thought the idea was to IMPEACH, though?

Now, explain how "this is different".

[Mr.Badguy]

It's different because the two worked together on public policy to make each other look good, similar to what people like you might hope for the Trump/Putin relationship. Clinton didn't benefit from Yeltsin perpetrating a cyber crime against his opponent.

[Granule]

Sigh, if you really need someone to tell you how this is different then you're too far gone as it is. But fine, I'd be willing to condemn both Clinton and Trump. Will any of you condemn either?

I'd be willing to condemn Trump if he were actually guilty. You stupid fuckers still have to cook up your bullshit case and then get him convicted, first.

[(o,o)]

It's different because the two worked together on public policy to make each other look good, similar to what people like you might hope for the Trump/Putin relationship. Clinton didn't benefit from Yeltsin perpetrating a cyber crime against his opponent.

To make each other look good?

Clinton colluded with a Russian president to gain an electoral advantage in his campaign, and offered the Russian a quid pro quo.

It must have paid off for both of them.