canceled.2021.3 (07-17-2017)
Only if you have a not particularly intelligent 6th grader's, understanding of the word "presidential".
According to your strictly literal interpretation of the word, Trump could pull down his drawers and take a dump on the sidewalk in full public view, and simply by virtue of his title, that act would in your mind be, "presidential".
To most people with a more mature adult take on it, the word connotes acting in a way that is in keeping with the honor and dignity that has a long tradition of being associated with such a high office.
The fact that right-wingers don't understand that and have to have it explained to them like children, is emblematic of how and why a low rent, unworthy piece of trash like Trump got elected to begin with.
The political right is the ideology of tackiness, ignorance and trashiness.
And Donald Trump, along with his family, are the face of it.
C'MON MAN!!!!
canceled.2021.3 (07-17-2017)
christiefan915 (07-17-2017)
It's just a lowering of the bar. And yeah - Hillary would have, too.
It's not something to be celebrated. If you do, then you basically forfeit your right to complain about any future Dem, no matter how dishonest, corrupt or duplicitous they are. It's all on the table now.
But we all know that you WILL complain about future Dems. You're still complaining about Hillary, and she is forever out of power. It's just typical double-standard BS, more than anything.
canceled.2021.3 (07-17-2017)
Remember stories like these from before the election?
Clinton takes double-digit poll lead against Trump
Clinton leads Trump by 12 points among likely voters nationally — 50 to 38 percent — with Libertarian Gary Johnson at 5 percent support and Green Party nominee Jill Stein at 2 percent, according to the latest ABC News tracking poll taken after the third and final presidential debate. It’s the biggest lead Clinton has ever posted in similar polls by ABC News and the Washington Post.
“No candidate has ever come back from this far behind,” ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos declared Sunday on “This Week.”
http://nypost.com/2016/10/23/clinton...against-trump/
canceled.2021.3 (07-17-2017)
so let's break down your stupidity to it's simplest form.
So if she deems that one of her email chains making a deal with Russia providing them access to our plutonium in exchange for the Russians dumping a billion dollars into the Clinton "foundation"
Then she just bleaches into never to be read and claims it was a personal email then that's ok?
I know reasonable deduction is not your strong suit but this one is a softball, give it a try lolololol
This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT
C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network
Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you
canceled.2021.3 (07-17-2017)
This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT
C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network
Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you
BRUTALITOPS (07-17-2017), canceled.2021.3 (07-17-2017)
No one?
No candidate has ever come back from this far behind,” ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos declared Sunday on “This Week.”
canceled.2021.3 (07-17-2017)
christiefan915 (07-17-2017)
canceled.2021.3 (07-17-2017)
I agree that Trump is thin skinned and narcissistic. But I don't see that as a disqualifier to be President. Every person I have ever known who has climbed to positions of power are thin skinned and narcissistic.
You seem to be ascribing these attributes to Trump as if they are truly unprecedented. They are not.
That's not an unfair assessment in general. You could ascribe those qualities to guys like Clinton & Obama, to an extent - just about every President.
Trump takes it to such a cartoonish extreme. I firmly believe that those who dismiss his reactions and general m.o. do so more in reaction to the media & liberals than any real assessment on how they feel about this actions. In other words, they're dug in because they don't want to cede a thing to the media/the left. If Trump's behavior existed in a vacuum, I think the right would feel much differently about it.
Which is why I remain confident in my prediction that years from now, it will be difficult to find someone who would say that voted for or supported Trump as more than just an anti-Hillary sentiment.
canceled.2021.3 (07-17-2017)
Here is what is really bothering libtards like Thingy. He is used to a one way street with Republicans. For example the left in the past has been able to accuse any republican of the most dastardly deeds and said Republican would turn the other cheek and allow a narrative to be formed about them. Romney is a perfect example. Remember the dog on top of the car? Romney bullying some snowflake? The conventional wisdom of these republicans was just try to be nice and rise above it all.
Well, those of us who supported Republicans hated that they didn't defend themselves or conservative ideals. Democrats said republicans wanted to kill Grammy and republicans would just take it. Kanye says Bush hates black people and Bush just took it. Democrats say Bush lied about WMD and Bush just took it.
Well Trump don't play that shit. If you hit him, he hits back.
So when liberal snowflakes cry that Trump isn't acting "Presidential" what they really mean is "he doesn't take out criticism lying down like other republicans do"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
BRUTALITOPS (07-17-2017)
The mainstream media (exemplified here by former Clintonista George Stephanopoulos declared that Trump could not and would not 'come back from this far behind', which means that someone argued that Trump couldn't close the gap in the final 2 weeks.
Bookmarks