Question for libs, dems and/or snowflakes...

**Cancel 2018.1** · 06-26-2017, 11:27 AM

If the emails from the DNC and Podesta exposed by Wikileaks had been proven to be sourced from say, a dem watchdog group looking to clean up the DNC's act or from Bernie bros, or say from G.B or Canada (our staunchest allies) would you behave differently or still put your heads in the sand? So far I've heard nothing from dems about doing anything to hold their leaders responsible for their blatant corruption not to speak of open racism.

Repubs, right leaners, independents, tea partiers, stormfronters, and libertarians please refrain from commenting for about a day. I really only want to see responses, if any , from the left.

I predict very few responses or 'yeah but Trump colluded blah blah', or I will be personally attacked. Almost guaranteed if TTQ responds she'll call me a racist for posting this.
BAC has already started a thread about the need for dem introspection , no real need for him to respond, but of course I welcome his comments.

**domer76** · 06-26-2017, 04:56 PM

^Hypothesis Contrary to Fact.

=

FAIL

**Cancel 2018.1** · 06-26-2017, 05:00 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

^Hypothesis Contrary to Fact.

=

FAIL

So no answer. As I predicted. So what is the hypothesis and what is fact?

**domer76** · 06-26-2017, 05:06 PM

Originally Posted by aloysious

So no answer. As I predicted. So what is the hypothesis and what is fact?

(laughing)

It's such a common and transparent tactic that you RW dolts use. Do something different and actually look it up.

You concoct a scenario that never occurred and then proceed to argue as if it was fact. It's the typical "if /would" bullshit that I constantly bring to your attention.

**Cancel 2018.1** · 06-26-2017, 05:42 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

(laughing)

It's such a common and transparent tactic that you RW dolts use. Do something different and actually look it up.

You concoct a scenario that never occurred and then proceed to argue as if it was fact. It's the typical "if /would" bullshit that I constantly bring to your attention.

Again no answer. OK then. I'll cut right to the chase. So far I've heard nothing from dems about doing anything to hold their leaders responsible for their blatant corruption not to speak of open racism.
You're non response tells me that you and most of the rest of the dims are either perfectly OK with DNC corruption or you choose to turn a blind eye toward it. Either way it does not bode well for the future of the dem party.

**domer76** · 06-26-2017, 05:49 PM

Originally Posted by aloysious

Again no answer. OK then. I'll cut right to the chase. So far I've heard nothing from dems about doing anything to hold their leaders responsible for their blatant corruption not to speak of open racism.
You're non response tells me that you and most of the rest of the dims are either perfectly OK with DNC corruption or you choose to turn a blind eye toward it. Either way it does not bode well for the future of the dem party.

Damn funny!

You want an answer to a make-believe scenario?

Loser!

**Cancel 2018.1** · 06-26-2017, 06:04 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

Damn funny!

You want an answer to a make-believe scenario?

Loser!

Again, no answer. So what is the make believe scenario? The emails published by Wikileaks? DNC corruption ? Your non answers? That you and most of the rest of dims are OK with DNC corruption? Or did I miss something?

**domer76** · 06-26-2017, 06:34 PM

Originally Posted by aloysious

Again, no answer. So what is the make believe scenario? The emails published by Wikileaks? DNC corruption ? Your non answers? That you and most of the rest of dims are OK with DNC corruption? Or did I miss something?

You started with an "if", moron. "If" has never occurred in the entire history of mankindz

Keep flailing, though

**Cancel 2018.1** · 06-26-2017, 06:45 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

You started with an "if", moron. "If" has never occurred in the entire history of mankindz

Keep flailing, though

Again, no answer to the question, "so what is the make believe scenario?" I gave you five choices based on your non response and even the opportunity to clarify if I missed something. Why won't you answer a simple question? I think it's too uncomfortable for you to answer because, yes, dims in general are quite comfortable with DNC corruption. That doesn't bode well for your politics.

**domer76** · 06-26-2017, 06:57 PM

Originally Posted by aloysious

Again, no answer to the question, "so what is the make believe scenario?" I gave you five choices based on your non response and even the opportunity to clarify if I missed something. Why won't you answer a simple question? I think it's too uncomfortable for you to answer because, yes, dims in general are quite comfortable with DNC corruption. That doesn't bode well for your politics.

You're just not very bright, are you? No "ifs" about it.

**Cancel 2018.1** · 06-26-2017, 07:00 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

You're just not very bright, are you?

Possible not but I can answer questions, not matter how uncomfortable the answer may be to me. Go ahead and ask me one.
You can't due to stupidity or won't due to dishonesty. Which is it? (another question)

**domer76** · 06-26-2017, 07:49 PM

Originally Posted by aloysious

Possible not but I can answer questions, not matter how uncomfortable the answer may be to me. Go ahead and ask me one.
You can't due to stupidity or won't due to dishonesty. Which is it? (another question)

Love to. I'll give you an "if". Feel free to wade in.

"If" pigs were invisible, pork prices "would" be much higher.

Go for it.

**Cancel 2018.1** · 06-26-2017, 08:04 PM

Originally Posted by domer76

Love to. I'll give you an "if". Feel free to wade in.

"If" pigs were invisible, pork prices "would" be much higher.

Go for it.

If they were held in cramped pens in barns like they are in Germany I'd say no. If they were able to roam free range I'd say yes because they'd be hard to find but not that hard with use of infrared.
That wasn't even uncomfortable or hard.
My turn.
Dims and MSM are very quiet about the blatant corruption not to speak of open racism exposed by the wikipedia divulged emails of the DNC and Podesta . Why do you think that is so? That doesn't even have if in it. Should be an easy answer. You won't answer because I think you know I have an uncomfortable response for you no matter how you answer it.

**domer76** · 06-26-2017, 10:51 PM

Originally Posted by aloysious

If they were held in cramped pens in barns like they are in Germany I'd say no. If they were able to roam free range I'd say yes because they'd be hard to find but not that hard with use of infrared.
That wasn't even uncomfortable or hard.
My turn.
Dims and MSM are very quiet about the blatant corruption not to speak of open racism exposed by the wikipedia divulged emails of the DNC and Podesta . Why do you think that is so? That doesn't even have if in it. Should be an easy answer. You won't answer because I think you know I have an uncomfortable response for you no matter how you answer it.

Beautiful!

Dodging your own "if/would" OP!

**Cancel 2018.1** · 06-27-2017, 01:10 AM

Originally Posted by domer76

Beautiful!

Dodging your own "if/would" OP!

Not at all. Just answered your question. By my count I've posed 4 questions and you haven't answered one. You queried me once and I answered seamlessly although it was irrelevant to the topic OP.
I commend you for not answering because, as you seem to know, I'd thrash you ruthlessly no matter your answer.
You didn't really go to ND did you? Your just a fan , right? I thought that was supposed to be a pretty good school that only accepted "smart" students except for their economics program that anybody with a room temperature IQ could get thru.