Members banned from this thread: evince, iolo, Buckly J. Ewer and Nomad


Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 80

Thread: STUNNING charge from Wasserman Schultz - Obama admin allowed the DNC hacking

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    You realize in that last post you just confirmed that the Russians did interfere and they interfered in favor of Trump?

    I don't care about WikiLeaks, nor last year's election, just like I don't care about the election of 2012 or any other in the past, they are history, not our fault you have a Clinton phobia and are stuck with a failing Presidency, get over it, it is 2017
    Of course you don't care about FACTS; you only care about false narratives and the lies spread by the Party of the Jackass in an effort to destroy our election processes. Dunce.

    Julian Assange unequivocally states that the information they received was NOT from the Russian Government scarecrow. Got brains?
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,254
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,247 Times in 13,970 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Excuse me scarecrow; but the bolded is a FACT. And if you had watched the Wassermann interview, she not only confirms it, but then impugns the Obama Administration for it's incompetence and lies. Were you born this stupid; or do you work at it? That was rhetorical.
    Ah, that is not true either, he did act, threw out Russian officials in US, added sanctions, confronted Putin directly, and put into place a plan to jeopardize Russian infrastructure via computer access, as I said, you really aren't up to date

    Also, again if you knew what you were talking about, the WikiLeaks information had been obtained prior to the President confronted Putin

    Could he have done more, of course. but then he would have had all you conspiracy nuts claiming he was throwing the election, Rush could have bought himself another Florida home off the money he could have made demonizing that one

    You really got to read if you want to post intelligent information

  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,254
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,247 Times in 13,970 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Trump loving wikileaks exposure of DNC corruption is not a crime scarecrow; I do wish you had a brain....but then, you wouldn't be a willful shill for the Party of the Jackass.
    Getting funnier, having trouble processing information, and, let me help you out, emojis are corny, unless your a junior high girl gossiping with her friends

  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,254
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,247 Times in 13,970 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    You realize in that last post you just confirmed that the Russians did interfere and they interfered in favor of Trump?

    I don't care about WikiLeaks, nor last year's election, just like I don't care about the election of 2012 or any other in the past, they are history, not our fault you have a Clinton phobia and are stuck with a failing Presidency, get over it, it is 2017
    My bad, that was suppose to got under the other guy who said that the WikiLeaks was the center of the investigations

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,254
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,247 Times in 13,970 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Of course you don't care about FACTS; you only care about false narratives and the lies spread by the Party of the Jackass in an effort to destroy our election processes. Dunce.

    Julian Assange unequivocally states that the information they received was NOT from the Russian Government scarecrow. Got brains?
    I "don't care about the facts" and then he goes on to use Julian Assange as a source, beautiful

    I really hope you don't OD on that Kool Aid


  6. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,839
    Thanks
    16,897
    Thanked 21,037 Times in 14,531 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Then show one definitive FACT that supports the accusation.

    Just one; because all that's been presented is a big ole "LOOKY THERE".
    Patience, Grasshopper. trump has been obstructing any investigations. Nunes was the first step....followed by numerous others. When trump's financials come out, we'll understand exactly why he colluded with Russia. They have him over a barrel. How do you explain his allowing Russian operatives into the White House in order to give them classified information? He made sure the U.S press wasn't around.


    This is just starting to get good.


    Stay tuned.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    christiefan915 (06-25-2017)

  8. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,839
    Thanks
    16,897
    Thanked 21,037 Times in 14,531 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Was anything in those WikiLeaks false??
    I believe the pertinent question is...'Why didn't Wiki release internal RNC communications when they were plotting to get rid of trump in the primaries?'

    Now that would be some juicy stuff.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  9. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Patience, Grasshopper. trump has been obstructing any investigations. Nunes was the first step....followed by numerous others. When trump's financials come out, we'll understand exactly why he colluded with Russia. They have him over a barrel. How do you explain his allowing Russian operatives into the White House in order to give them classified information? He made sure the U.S press wasn't around.


    This is just starting to get good.


    Stay tuned.
    So you have NOTHING; but you are praying for ANYTHING.
    I understand.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  10. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-26-2017)

  11. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    I believe the pertinent question is...'Why didn't Wiki release internal RNC communications when they were plotting to get rid of trump in the primaries?'

    Now that would be some juicy stuff.
    And you still can't show anything, HUH!
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  12. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-26-2017)

  13. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    5,166
    Thanks
    1,138
    Thanked 2,495 Times in 1,799 Posts
    Groans
    7
    Groaned 171 Times in 164 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Who cares, last years news, I realize it ain't easy defending the President
    For those that defend him, no it isn't. He's uncouth, obnoxious, immature, has really bad orange hair and the orange spray tan doesn't work.
    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    nor his policies, if you can figure out exactly what his policies are,
    Now that's easy:
    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    Gorsuch.......Keystone pipeline.....removal of restrictions on domestic oil production.....reduced immigration......increased consumer confidence.......I will catch my breath while you contemplate those......
    Quote Originally Posted by aloysious View Post
    I was thinking the same. Paring down the overreach of the EPA, charter schools, no subsidies to failing green energy companies which end up going BK anyway (solyndra)....
    And they're very easy to defend. And that's just a short list
    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    but you got to get over your obsession with Hillary, it's 2017, last year's talk radio scapegoats aren't relevant, nobody cares
    As long as she ShutsTFU I will ignore her. As soon as she does more stupid shit like her excuse tour or Wonder Woman comparison, I won't.

    What I find amazing is that the exposed Podesta and DNC emails exposing their corruption don't even faze the snowflakes. Rather than try and correct it or do some badly needed introspection they hunker down with more nebulous and tertiary charges against Trump. Witness intimidation from tweets? Really? And you're going to investigate that?
    What's your message, snowflakes, beside repealing the 1st and 2nd amendments? Because that's all I see and you're not going far with that.
    Last edited by Cancel 2018.1; 06-25-2017 at 03:03 PM.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2018.1 For This Post:

    Stretch (06-25-2017)

  15. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Patience, Grasshopper. trump has been obstructing any investigations. Nunes was the first step....followed by numerous others. When trump's financials come out, we'll understand exactly why he colluded with Russia. They have him over a barrel. How do you explain his allowing Russian operatives into the White House in order to give them classified information? He made sure the U.S press wasn't around.


    This is just starting to get good.


    Stay tuned.
    "Russian operatives" sounds so ominous. It was a Russian photog and Serge Lavrov their Foreign Affairs Minister
    ( equivalent to our Sec of State) -and it wasn't any secret.

    He gave them info on the fact of laptops becoming more used for airplane attacks.
    we are still partnered on terrorism despite the Russiaphobia

    Keep waiting on that collusion ..it's gonna be long after we're dead.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Stretch (06-25-2017), Truth Detector (06-26-2017)

  17. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    "Russian operatives" sounds so ominous. It was a Russian photog and Serge Lavrov their Foreign Affairs Minister
    ( equivalent to our Sec of State) -and it wasn't any secret.

    He gave them info on the fact of laptops becoming more used for airplane attacks.
    we are still partnered on terrorism despite the Russiaphobia

    Keep waiting on that collusion ..it's gonna be long after we're dead.
    It's because he's Trump.

    JAMES TRUMP

    and he likes them shaken, not stirred.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Stretch (06-25-2017), Truth Detector (06-26-2017)

  19. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    It's one of the gifts of a Trump Presidency.
    It is a little like flipping the light on in a dark corner of the kitchen at 3a.m., isn't it? Lotta critters get exposed. LOL
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-26-2017)

  21. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    You really are uninformed, or, as your fat boy puts it, "low information," it was your Donald that claimed the Obama did nothing about the hacking;

    "Just out: The Obama Administration knew far in advance of November 8th about election meddling by Russia. Did nothing about it. WHY?
    8:43 PM - 23 Jun 2017" - Trump

    And did you notice by doing such he is acknowledging Russian interference, try to keep up
    Of course there was Russian interference...and was...and is...all over the world. Heck, even Obama "interfered" with the Israeli election. This is not news. But, there was no Russian "collusion" with Trump. How many times does this have to be repeated month after month.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-26-2017)

  23. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Trey Gowdy Finds Out DNC Server Was Never Turned Over To Law Enforcement & He's Pissed
    About time someone was pissed over it.

    It's amazing, that this Russia thing was allowed to go on for so long when the single most important piece of evidence hasn't been looked at by the FBI.

    That just blows me away. No wonder Trump doesn't go on about the 'Russian hacking'. I wouldn't either.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Truth Detector (06-26-2017)

Similar Threads

  1. Hillary Promotes Nazi Wasserman Schultz
    By Face, Your in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-26-2016, 03:33 AM
  2. Wasserman-Schultz out as DNC Chair
    By anatta in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-28-2016, 12:20 AM
  3. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is on a (lying) roll
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 09-06-2012, 02:56 PM
  4. Debbie Wasserman Schultz Is Pathetic
    By RockX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-06-2012, 11:36 AM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-07-2011, 12:18 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •