STUNNING charge from Wasserman Schultz - Obama admin allowed the DNC hacking

[Truth Detector]

Yep; the rats are jumping ship and impugning their own as they run away from each other and the massive FALSE narrative of Russian collusion with the Trump Campaign.

Watch and learn snowflakes as the FAKE media narrative unravels:



"at no point, and I am a member of Congress who had the ability to be briefed in a classified setting....., were we notified.....even through our switchboard"

Wasserman in response to the claim that the FBI were rebuffed by the DNC to investigate: "definitely Johnson was utterly misinformed."

She goes on to claim "the FBI did virtually NOTHING to make sure that when they were aware, at the point that they were aware that was an intrusion on our network, by the Russians, that they did virtually nothing to sound the alarm bells."[/I]

This makes Comey a liar....Johnson a liar....and puts the entire narrative onto the Obama Presidency.

[Truth Detector]

Trey Gowdy mopping the floor with Jeh Johnson's hair.

[Truth Detector]

Trey Gowdy Finds Out DNC Server Was Never Turned Over To Law Enforcement & He's Pissed

[archives]

Who cares, last years news, I realize it ain't easy defending the President nor his policies, if you can figure out exactly what his policies are, but you got to get over your obsession with Hillary, it's 2017, last year's talk radio scapegoats aren't relevant, nobody cares

[Truth Detector]

I guess the Democrat rats can't remember what lies they erupted with last.

Who are the liars? Here's the Liar and Chief himself:

[anatta]

LOL.. Now Waserman-Schultz is saying the FBI did nothing tomake the DNC aware to sound the alarm bells."

Then why not give the servers over to the FBI when the FBI wanted them?

Instead the Clintonistas hired Crowdstrike?

[archives]

Trey Gowdy Finds Out DNC Server Was Never Turned Over To Law Enforcement & He's Pissed

"Trey Gowdy is pissed," now there's something to be scared at, too funny, loved the way he got "pissed" two years ago and spent his way thru sixteen months of millions of taxpayers dollars on a redundant "investigation' that didn't find anything the other previous "investigations" found, yeah, people are really scared when "Trey Gowdy is pissed"

[anatta]

CrowdStrike: Five Things Everyone Is Ignoring About The Russia-DNC Story

The Democratic Party and mainstream media have become increasingly consumed with the narrative that Donald Trump’s election win is largely influenced by Russian hacking.

The narrative is centered around two hacks–the hack of a DNC server that led to the release of embarrassing emails during the Democratic National Convention, and the hack of John Podesta’s email which led to several embarrassing moments for the Clinton campaign in October 2016. Both are supposedly the result of the Russians.

The Russia story is back in the headlines once again after reports surrounding former President Barack Obama’s attempts to “punish” Russia for its interference.

However, there is still a cloud of doubt hanging over the DNC’s Russia narrative on the breach of the DNC servers.

The analysis that alleged that Russia was behind the DNC server breach was carried out not by the U.S. government, but by the private security group CrowdStrike.

CrowdStrike is the sole source of this claim, with their June 2016 report, “Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee” being the basis of the DNC’s Russian hacking allegations.

Here are five key points about CrowdStrike that the mainstream media is ignoring:

1. Obama Appoints CrowdStrike Officer To Admin Post Two Months Before June 2016 Report On Russia Hacking DNC

In April 2016, two months before the June report that alleged a Russian conspiracy, former President Barack Obama appointed Steven Chabinsky, the general counsel and chief risk officer for CrowdStrike, to the Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity.

CrowdStrike co-founder George Kurtz said at the time, “We wish Steve and the rest of the Commissioners every success in this important effort. Their dedicated and thoughtful leadership on these issues holds great potential for promoting innovation and the benefits of technology, while lowering the very real security risks we are facing today.”

2. The FBI Never Looked At The DNC’s Servers — Only CrowdStrike Did

As far as we know, the FBI still has not examined the DNC server that Russia allegedly hacked.

There has been no corroboration or second opinion on who may have hacked the server. The only source for this claim is CrowdStrike, who began monitoring the DNC system on May 5th, 2016, according to DailyMail.com.

The DNC also reportedly paid $168,000 to CrowdStrike.

3. Comey Contradicted The DNC’s Story On The FBI Asking To See The Server

The DNC claimed in January that the reason the FBI never examined their hacked server was simple–the FBI never requested to do so. Yet, DNC deputy communications director Eric Walker gave told BuzzFeed News in an email, “The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (DC) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers.”

However, tthis claim was contradicted by then-FBI director James Comey, who said in a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing in January that there were “multiple requests at different levels” to look at the DNC’s servers. Instead, Comey said a “highly respected private company” got access to the servers–meaning CrowdStrike.

A senior FBI official told WIRED in January,

“The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated.”

“This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier.”

As Josephine Wolff of Slate pointed out, “…whether because they were denied access or simply never asked for it, the FBI instead used the analysis of the DNC breach conducted by security firm CrowdStrike as the basis for its investigation. Regardless of who is telling the truth about what really happened, perhaps the most astonishing thing about this probe is that a private firm’s investigation and attribution was deemed sufficient by both the DNC and the FBI.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/24/cr...sia-dnc-story/

[archives]

Who cares, last years news, I realize it ain't easy defending the President nor his policies, if you can figure out exactly what his policies are, but you got to get over your obsession with Hillary, it's 2017, last year's talk radio scapegoats aren't relevant, nobody cares

Well, if you are really looking for an answer, it could be perhaps that the Clinton campaign believed they had the situtation under control, and why involve an outside Government agency, but I'm sure you were looking for more of the Info Wars conspiratorial type response, so the obvious doesn't defend your scenario

[USFREEDOM911]

Who cares, last years news, I realize it ain't easy defending the President nor his policies, if you can figure out exactly what his policies are, but you got to get over your obsession with Hillary, it's 2017, last year's talk radio scapegoats aren't relevant, nobody cares

WHO CARES?????

Ever since the election, there have been on going rumors that Trump "colluded with Russia" and now, none of this matters.

The DNC did their "own investigation" for their servers.
Hillary used a server that was located in a bathroom.
Hillary "wiped clean" hard drives and had others destroyed.

AND NOW, "WHO CARES".

This is more proof that liberals care nothing about the truth and just want to stick with their conjecture, assumptions, assertions, and allegations.

[Stretch]

Who cares, last years news, I realize it ain't easy defending the President nor his policies, if you can figure out exactly what his policies are, but you got to get over your obsession with Hillary, it's 2017, last year's talk radio scapegoats aren't relevant, nobody cares

That would all be just dandy if they had bowed out gracefully. But, the war is on now because they couldn't shut up and go away. They had to attempt to transfer their sins on to the new administration so, this will go forward into the present and future. The ship has already sailed and it was the Dems who are hoisting themselves by their own petard.

[Truth Detector]

LOL.. Now Waserman-Schultz is saying the FBI did nothing tomake the DNC aware to sound the alarm bells."

Then why not give the servers over to the FBI when the FBI wanted them?

Instead the Clintonistas hired Crowdstrike?

You cannot make this stuff up; and she goes after Johnson for even suggesting that they did. PRICELESS

[archives]

"Donald Trump’s election win is largely influenced by Russian hacking," to deny that fact would mean you are also saying the WikiLeaks input plus barrage of fake news stories had zero impact on the election.

If such was the case, then the six month campaign by the right wing media was in error since those are the elements they focused on 24/7, even the President admitted their role in his campaign

[Truth Detector]

"Trey Gowdy is pissed," now there's something to be scared at, too funny, loved the way he got "pissed" two years ago and spent his way thru sixteen months of millions of taxpayers dollars on a redundant "investigation' that didn't find anything the other previous "investigations" found, yeah, people are really scared when "Trey Gowdy is pissed"

Deflect little snowflake; but the FAKE narrative idiots like you swallowed dished out by the FAKE media is rapidly unwinding. And, as Americans wake up to this reality, it could strike an even deeper death blow to the Party of the Jackass. You ignorant twits are too stupid to comprehend the OBVIOUS.

[anatta]

Consider the declassified summary of the Intelligence Community’s assessment of “Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections.”

The DNC breaches feature prominently in that summary but, more to the point, the primary rationale readers are given for why they should believe that the Russian government meddled in the U.S. election is because the FBI, CIA, and NSA believe that to be the case. We are given very little actual detail about what happened or how the incidents were traced to Russia specifically, while we are treated to numerous statements along the lines of: “We assess with high confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election” or “We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.”

Of course, there are many reasons the Intelligence Community might have decided not to reveal any actual evidence for these claims. But in the absence of that evidence, whether or not you believe their conclusions rests entirely on your confidence in the judgment and investigative abilities of the FBI, CIA, and NSA. And if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. The DNC breach is not the only incident attributed to Russia in the Intelligence assessment summary and it’s likely that some of the others were directly investigated by the government. But even so, this conflation of government- and industry-gathered evidence without clear distinctions makes it harder to take the agencies’ assessments at face value.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_te...owdstrike.html

SLATE Magazine