more sources speak of kennedy retirement

[tsuke]

http://thepoliticalinsider.com/justi...?source=WDlive

[canceled.2021.3]

So much for Deshtards redistricting ruling Comrade Tsuke. It really makes the money we paid Putin to interfere worth it. I guess we just wanted the courts more than they did.

[Jarod]

Good God I hope he holds out at least another term.

[canceled.2021.3]

Buh bye Roe v Wade

[anatta]

I just hope we can get rid of Ginsburg..shes gotta go

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...isgrace-to-the
Trump fires back: Ginsburg's comments a 'disgrace to the court'
© Getty Images

Donald Trump on Tuesday dismissed Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's criticism of his presidential campaign, calling her remarks "beneath the court."

“I think it’s highly inappropriate that a United States Supreme Court judge gets involved in a political campaign, frankly,” Trump said in an interview with The New York Times.

“I think it’s a disgrace to the court and I think she should apologize to the court. I couldn’t believe it when I saw it,” he added.

Trump's response comes after Ginsburg blasted the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, saying she cannot "imagine what this place would be" like under Trump. She added that she might even move to New Zealand if he wins in November.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” Ginsburg told the Times.

“For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that,” she added.

[MAGA MAN]

Good God I hope he holds out at least another term.

What's your plan B lol?

[Cancel 2020.1]

It's amazing, but the biggest buffoon to ever hold the highest office might also have the most influence on the court in history.

Such a nightmare.

[canceled.2021.3]

Good God I hope he holds out at least another term.

Cry harder. Now Ginsberg needs to assume room temp. Then Breyer.

Game. Set. Match.

You bitches should have wanted the courts as badly as we did.

We warned you about using the court as your little Petri dish. Now you will get yours.

[MAGA MAN]

It's amazing, but the biggest buffoon to ever hold the highest office might also have the most influence on the court in history.

Such a nightmare.

The Obama only had one pick ...

[canceled.2021.3]

It's amazing, but the biggest buffoon to ever hold the highest office might also have the most influence on the court in history.

Such a nightmare.

You see unlike you I can look into the political future. Herein lies the entire reason I supported Trump. If he can leave with a 6-3 Conservative court he will leave a legacy that will last 30 years.

You bitches dicker about Obamacare and whatever the fuck but we are playing long

With the courts firmly in hand we can dismantle liberalism no matter who wins elections

Suck it

[Cancel 2020.1]

You see unlike you I can look into the political future. Herein lies the entire reason I supported Trump. If he can leave with a 6-3 Conservative court he will leave a legacy that will last 30 years.

You bitches dicker about Obamacare and whatever the fuck but we are playing long

With the courts firmly in hand we can dismantle liberalism no matter who wins elections

Suck it

Believe it or not, I understand that reason for supporting Trump.

But you're fooling yourself - because you're defending & apologizing for every boneheaded thing Trump does. Your posts on this board betray your whole "oh, I just voted for him for the courts" lie.

You're as much of a Trump hack as anyone on here.

[GazzaQueen]

Believe it or not, I understand that reason for supporting Trump.

But you're fooling yourself - because you're defending & apologizing for every boneheaded thing Trump does. Your posts on this board betray your whole "oh, I just voted for him for the courts" lie.

You're as much of a Trump hack as anyone on here.

Being a Jill Stein voter doesn't exactly add to your credibility.

[Cancel 2020.1]

For the record, I'd be as alarmed by a 6-3 or 7-2 liberal majority as I am by the impending 6-3/7-2 conservative majority.

If the court is an ideological one - and it is - it should reflect America. America is centrist - I'll even concede right-center if it's important to anyone. A lopsided court in either direction works against too many people. In my opinion, the court selection process is a real flaw in our process. It shouldn't be at the whim of a Presidential election - and the Congress should NOT have been able to block Garland, who was a very moderate choice.

[BRUTALITOPS]

The court is not a representative branch of government. It exists only to interpret the constitution. The only reason we have partisan splits is because liberals don't believe in the constitution and try legislating from the bench.

also even though the very visible cases have close splits, usually 90%+ of cases heard end with 9-0 decisions. There was actually a case on free speech recently that had said result

[BRUTALITOPS]

I can't wait for the liberal tears next week