Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 456789 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 135

Thread: Study Finds Right to Carry Increases Violent Crime

  1. #106 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alice in Liberaland View Post
    Doesn't matter. We aren't banning guns here. Let it go bitch


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Have to laugh that it's the best you have.

  2. #107 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Upper Bucks County, PA
    Posts
    761
    Thanks
    115
    Thanked 279 Times in 190 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 21 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    lol

    Try this one, idiot. Let's see the stats for western countries that have almost no guns. Start with Canada, Australia, Japan.

    I'll wait, moron.
    One would expect that such a simple premise as "more guns = more gun deaths" would not require complex explanation to prove it.

    You state it and you repeat it because of that simplicity and ease of understanding but now you demand that other comparisons / data be included in our consideration of your statement?

    You have presented a premise with only one variable, MORE GUNS . . .

    You posit the only unavoidable outcome of adding "MORE GUNS" to a society is "MORE GUN DEATHS".

    That for the USA, over 25 years, the actual realized outcome is FEWER GUN DEATHS after 200 million guns are added, defeats your premise.

    If you have a different theory, one that depends on more complex data then run with it.

    The "more guns = more gun deaths" one is dead.

  3. #108 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abatis View Post
    One would expect that such a simple premise as "more guns = more gun deaths" would not require complex explanation to prove it.

    You state it and you repeat it because of that simplicity and ease of understanding but now you demand that other comparisons / data be included in our consideration of your statement?

    You have presented a premise with only one variable, MORE GUNS . . .

    You posit the only unavoidable outcome of adding "MORE GUNS" to a society is "MORE GUN DEATHS".

    That for the USA, over 25 years, the actual realized outcome is FEWER GUN DEATHS after 200 million guns are added, defeats your premise.

    If you have a different theory, one that depends on more complex data then run with it.

    The "more guns = more gun deaths" one is dead.
    Los Angeles has more cars than drivers. Are there more traffic deaths because of this? Domer?

  4. #109 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    I wonder what are the statistical odds of being a hero during a home invasion robbery and killing or disarming a perp versus family members who accidentally kill or intentionally kill oe maim themselves or others using guns.
    I think the former never even happens except on TV, and the latter is on the news every damn day. Stupid hick. Unless you are a cop or a soldier, the real utility of weapons if for sports, that's it. Sell stupid to dumbass Repukes.
    Ain't working here. I'm all for duck hunting, that's just ducky, but handguns are just close range human killers. And its usually a criminal killing a criminal or disaffected junior making a life changing mistake or an old fart who has given up on his life.
    They're made to work at distances, farther close range, also.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  5. #110 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Funny little toad.

    I laugh at you impotent douchenozzles that think your peashooter is the be all and end all. That it will protect you and your family. That it is the last bastion against that tyrannical government.

    Dream on Barney Fife.
    I take it you aren't very good a coloring, HUH!
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  6. #111 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abatis View Post
    One would expect that such a simple premise as "more guns = more gun deaths" would not require complex explanation to prove it.

    You state it and you repeat it because of that simplicity and ease of understanding but now you demand that other comparisons / data be included in our consideration of your statement?

    You have presented a premise with only one variable, MORE GUNS . . .

    You posit the only unavoidable outcome of adding "MORE GUNS" to a society is "MORE GUN DEATHS".

    That for the USA, over 25 years, the actual realized outcome is FEWER GUN DEATHS after 200 million guns are added, defeats your premise.

    If you have a different theory, one that depends on more complex data then run with it.

    The "more guns = more gun deaths" one is dead.
    I see you evade the obvious, moron. Why do you wish to avoid talking about Canada, Japan, Australia, England? A little uncomfortable?

  7. #112 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Los Angeles has more cars than drivers. Are there more traffic deaths because of this? Domer?
    Ah.

    The always idiotic and predictable car analogy.

    It failed the first few million times, cretin.

  8. #113 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Ah.

    The always idiotic and predictable car analogy.

    It failed the first few million times, cretin.
    Kind of like you crashing and burning on this subject. How prophetic..

  9. #114 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Upper Bucks County, PA
    Posts
    761
    Thanks
    115
    Thanked 279 Times in 190 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 21 Times in 20 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    I see you evade the obvious, moron. Why do you wish to avoid talking about Canada, Japan, Australia, England? A little uncomfortable?
    The question is not why am I ignoring the moving goal posts and your red herrings . . .

    The question is, why do you feel the need to employ fallacies to support / defend your statement?

  10. #115 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Kind of like you crashing and burning on this subject. How prophetic..
    No cogent response, huh, bitch?

    Also predictable.

  11. #116 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    No cogent response, huh, bitch?

    Also predictable.
    Pretty damn clear to anyone with any intelligence. I can see why you miss the point.

  12. #117 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abatis View Post
    The question is not why am I ignoring the moving goal posts and your red herrings . . .

    The question is, why do you feel the need to employ fallacies to support / defend your statement?
    I don't, cretin. Do your own homework.

  13. #118 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Pretty damn clear to anyone with any intelligence. I can see why you miss the point.
    I have to laugh at your willful ignorance of reality.

  14. #119 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    I have to laugh at your willful ignorance of reality.
    I find nothing about you laughable. Sad, not laughable.

  15. #120 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    I find nothing about you laughable. Sad, not laughable.
    Why don't you just a tiny bit of research on gun possession and personal harm, bitch? Don't want the truth?

Similar Threads

  1. FBI says violent crime & murders are up; will you blame Obama?
    By Legion Troll in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-26-2016, 10:39 AM
  2. NYC; 92% Of Violent Crime Committed By NON-Whites
    By ChoppedLiver in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 12-02-2015, 11:39 PM
  3. Yes, lead poisoning could really be a cause of violent crime
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 03-14-2013, 01:55 AM
  4. Do strict gun laws reduce violent crime?
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 08-16-2012, 02:28 PM
  5. Lead exposure linked to violent crime
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-28-2008, 09:21 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •