Let me see if I have this straight, the Senate Health Care Bill

[PostmodernProphet]

Let me see if I have this straight,

nope......wrong again........two for two, trollop.....

[Nomad]

ROFLMAO

Poor Gayrod thinks he knows better for other people. Let them vote their interests and you vote yours.

It is ironic that you claim to vote against your interests all the time.

Do you see the irony?
No?

No, the only irony is when poor redneck trash votes for Repugnant assholes who promise to gut the very same programs they depend on just because Repugnants always mouth a bunch of phony patriotic sounding rhetoric.

[Ralph]

ITs still the same basic format as Obamacare, It could be a lot worse, its not really a repeal.

Its simply a second generation Obamacare with less protections for poor people and a gutting of the taxes that paid for it.

"IF" it were being PAID FOR.....why then was Obama Care already failing and why was it deemed mandatory under penalty of fine and or imprisonment not to purchase that which was BEING PAID FOR? The supposed TAX that was targeted to PAY FOR IT was not sufficient to actually pay for the designed failure of the program that would hopefully lead to a single payer coverage controlled in its entirely by BIG BROTHER. Face it....the liberal "wet dream" of a 100% socialized single payer system has FAILED.

What's new about this latest BIG BROTHER boondoggle? Nothing....every time the government controls anything in its entirety its grossly mismanaged and can only continue IN THE RED. Look at all the progressive social programs (from social security to headstart)....all have failures and are all over budget. Why should this latest government boondoggle be any different? All one has to do is look to history in relation to the success or failures of socialism in the Untied States of America.

Its a documented fact that all the liberal social programs that supposedly are used in the "WAR ON POVERTY" have spent over 22 Trillion US tax dollars over the past 50 years...that's over 3x the amount spent on ALL THE WARS engaged by the US MILITARY over the entire course of this nation's history. The facts are indisputable and documented by the Government's own accounting system. If you can prove any of this information to be incorrect simply debunk the Government sources provided....the most telling number as presented by the governments own data? Since the supposed declared war on poverty i.e., the Great Society programs launched in the 60s....the poverty index has remained static at 14-15% since 1967 to date...after the tax payer expenditure of inflation adjusted monies that amount to 22 TRILLION with a T....strange is the fact that the US now finds itself some 19 Trillion in debt.

While the social liberals attempt to blame the 19 trillion dollar debt on the military....the facts as presented show that the spending on SOCIALISM and its failures to win the supposed war on poverty far out pace the monies spent on national defense....as stated before....socialism has spent/wasted (with no apparent gain) more than the 19 trillion...over 3x the amount spent by this nation since its inception on national defense and warfare.

Simply debunk the sources....or not...as the truth can never be subject to refutation.

http://www.heritage.org/poverty-and-...after-50-years

[Granule]

And it still doesn't repeal Obamacare. Nice job, fuckheads.

Who also agrees that it's time for that old piece of shit, McConnell, to curl up and die of ass cancer?

[USFREEDOM911]

They don't care, they wont like the result, but they wont care. That is why they are poor in the first place, they done base decisions on what will help them, they base decisions on angry emotion.

We have to pass it, too see what's in it.

[Getin the ring]

look I will bottom line this for the loons.

It's not a matter of IF Obamacare is repealed, it's WHEN.
nothing more to say except it's time to try something different, the ACA didn't work, Period, keep talking all you want, it's chatter, babble and chatter

[Getin the ring]

And it still doesn't repeal Obamacare. Nice job, fuckheads.

Who also agrees that it's time for that old piece of shit, McConnell, to curl up and die of ass cancer?

liberals have become such a class act ^^^^

[USFREEDOM911]

This is exactly it. We want children to die so we can have a BIGGER pools in our back yards.

ftfy, so Desh would be happy.

[GazzaQueen]

No, the only irony is when poor redneck trash votes for Repugnant assholes who promise to gut the very same programs they depend on just because Repugnants always mouth a bunch of phony patriotic sounding rhetoric.

Sadly, Obamacare providers have stopped providing, leaving millions of children dying in the streets.

Thanks, Obama

[USFREEDOM911]

BTW are they actually cutting spending or cutting the rate of growth? There is a difference not that I would expect a dumbass like Deshtard to get it

The liberal voting base HAS to promote this to fail; because if it becomes successful, they've lost yet another leg of support for their midterm ranting and their hopes for 2020.

[USFREEDOM911]

I do, in as far as it stops the bleeding that is Obamacare.

It's a discussion bill, needing all hands on deck to iron out fixes.

But the premise of not forcing someone to buy something they don't want to buy, or need.
And adding incentives for states to get involved more rather that the wholesale draining of federal funds, and allowing across state lines competition, you know that capitalism idea, is a start

I'm hoping that they remove all the roadblocks that stop insurance companies from competing in all States; because this would force the market to come down and give everyone the opportunity to choose which program works best for them.

[USFREEDOM911]

I think what's happening now is a near-perfect reflection of the differences in priorities between the 2 parties.

Democrats look out for the most vulnerable in our society. Republicans look out for the very wealthy.

You're partially right; because you left out that liberals look out for the most vulnerable in our society and then use them to the benefit of the liberals.

[USFREEDOM911]

How else would you interpret actions that take so much from the poor & give so much to the wealthy?

If the poor are so poor, then how can they even have enough to have TAKEN from them and GIVEN to anyone else?
Can you break it down on exactly how much the poor now have to give to the wealthy?

[signalmankenneth]

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-d...ns-for-america

[Jarod]

They're just hard working people hoping to be rich enough to vote Democratic one day.

You don't have to be rich to vote Democrat.