Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Healthcare bill

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default Healthcare bill

    https://www.budget.senate.gov/imo/me...HEALTHCARE.pdf

    if anyone is interested. Im going thru it now.

    (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A(c) of the Internal
    8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—
    9 (1) in paragraph (2)(B)(iii), by striking ‘‘2.5
    10 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘Zero percent’’, and
    11 (2) in paragraph (3)—
    12 (A) by striking ‘‘$695’’ in subparagraph
    13 (A) and inserting ‘‘$0’’, and

    looks like individual mandate is out.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to tsuke For This Post:

    Stretch (06-22-2017)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    $15,000,000,000 for each of calendar years 2018
    17 and 2019, and $10,000,000,000 for each of calendar
    18 years 2020 and 2021, to the Administrator of the
    19 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

    looks like there is some sort of subsidy.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to tsuke For This Post:

    Stretch (06-22-2017)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    The "individual" mandate was truly the only objection to the act......who cares what type of healthcare bill is passed in congress as long the bill is formatted for those who voluntarily want and need the coverage and the act is written within the boundaries of the US Constitution? The way that Obama Care was presented is nothing short of a method to redistribute earned income. At first it was stated that it was "not a tax" which was another blatant lie much like the "you can keep your insurance and doctor of your choice" ...another lie. SCTOUS did not endorse Obama Care as being "constitutional" as written....it had to be re-calibrated as a TAX. Which is in and by itself "unconstitutional" as Congress is the only government body that is authorized to "levy a tax"......but that never stopped Judge Roberts from re-drafting the legislation from the bench void of any type of representation from THE PEOPLE. http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...rew-c-mccarthy

    The real problem stemming from this act is not a Conservative approach of treating the symptoms of a cancerous disease as they attempt to cover up the cancer with a bandaid and say, "there...fixed it for ya"....the disease that is hurting this nation more than anything is a radical and runaway Judicial Branch of Government that self professes to be superior to the other branches of government...this type of progressive mentality has resulted in a nation that is run by an "Oligarchy" instead of being run by the actual owners of this free nation THE PEOPLE.

    The worse that can happen with the end of Obama Care is a return to the status quo pre OBAMA.....then perhaps some real effort from both sides of the isle can actually place the voice of the people 1st....instead of allowing a hand picked and very political group of un-elected and non-representative civil servants continue to draft new law from the bench THE PEOPLE are watching....we shall see.
    Last edited by Ralph; 06-22-2017 at 01:24 PM.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Ralph For This Post:

    Stretch (06-22-2017)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    1,394
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 492 Times in 336 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 113 Times in 111 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    The "individual" mandate was truly the only objection to the act......who cares what type of healthcare bill is passed in congress as long the bill is formatted for those who voluntarily want and need the coverage and the act is written within the boundaries of the US Constitution? The way that Obama Care was presented is nothing short of a method to redistribute earned income. At first it was stated that it was "not a tax" which was another blatant lie much like the "you can keep your insurance and doctor of your choice" ...another lie. SCTOUS did not endorse Obama Care as being "constitutional" as written....it had to be re-calibrated as a TAX. Which is in and by itself "unconstitutional" as Congress is the body that is authorized to "levy a tax"......but that never stopped Judge Roberts from re-drafting the legislation from the bench void of any type of representation from THE PEOPLE. http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...rew-c-mccarthy

    The worse that can happen with the end of Obama Care is a return to the status quo pre OBAMA.....then perhaps some real effort from both sides of the isle can actually place the voice of the people 1st. THE PEOPLE are watching....we shall see.
    This would be the same mandate proposed by Heritage?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to blackvegetable For This Post:

    Rune (06-23-2017)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    1,394
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 492 Times in 336 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 113 Times in 111 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    The "individual" mandate was truly the only objection to the act......who cares what type of healthcare bill is passed in congress as long the bill is formatted for those who voluntarily want and need the coverage and the act is written within the boundaries of the US Constitution? The way that Obama Care was presented is nothing short of a method to redistribute earned income. At first it was stated that it was "not a tax" which was another blatant lie much like the "you can keep your insurance and doctor of your choice" ...another lie. SCTOUS did not endorse Obama Care as being "constitutional" as written....it had to be re-calibrated as a TAX. Which is in and by itself "unconstitutional" as Congress is the only government body that is authorized to "levy a tax"......but that never stopped Judge Roberts from re-drafting the legislation from the bench void of any type of representation from THE PEOPLE. http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...rew-c-mccarthy

    The worse that can happen with the end of Obama Care is a return to the status quo pre OBAMA.....then perhaps some real effort from both sides of the isle can actually place the voice of the people 1st. THE PEOPLE are watching....we shall see.

    "The worse that can happen"


    Let's hear it for home skulin.....

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to blackvegetable For This Post:

    Rune (06-23-2017)

  11. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    26,547
    Thanks
    9,553
    Thanked 11,904 Times in 7,964 Posts
    Groans
    2,333
    Groaned 1,669 Times in 1,547 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    The "individual" mandate was truly the only objection to the act......who cares what type of healthcare bill is passed in congress as long the bill is formatted for those who voluntarily want and need the coverage and the act is written within the boundaries of the US Constitution. The way that Obama Care was presented is nothing short of a method to redistribute earned income. At first it was stated that it was "not a tax" which was another blatant lie much like the "you can keep your insurance and doctor of your choice lie.

    The worse that can happen with the end of Obama Care is a return to the status quo pre OBAMA.....then perhaps some real effort from both sides of the isle can actually place the voice of the people 1st. THE PEOPLE are watching....we shall see.
    Thinly veiled justification for the kind of right-wing greed that puts money not only above human misery and suffering, but above the misery and suffering of their fellow countrymen, women and children.

    And the dumbest part of the rights position is that, insurance or not, eventually sick people will need to seek treatment. But because they lack insurance due to the unGodly expense, they'll wait until their illness gets so bad they have no choice but to go to ER's where treatment cannot be refused, and where the now, much more expensive bill they cannot afford to pay, will be passed on to the taxpayer anyway.

    Too bad right-wing hatred, resentment and greed is too shortsighted to grasp that.

    But then again, I guess the logical extension of your position is to get the laws to where even ER's can refuse treatment based on ability to pay and poor sick people would be told to go somewhere and die.

    That's what you really want isn't it, right wing scum?
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nomad For This Post:

    christiefan915 (06-23-2017), Rune (06-23-2017)

  13. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    26,547
    Thanks
    9,553
    Thanked 11,904 Times in 7,964 Posts
    Groans
    2,333
    Groaned 1,669 Times in 1,547 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackvegetable View Post
    This would be the same mandate proposed by Heritage?
    Exactly the same one.

    The very same one that was once the Republican alternative to Hillarycare under Newt Gingrich.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Nomad For This Post:

    Rune (06-23-2017)

  15. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    4,929
    Thanked 3,685 Times in 2,733 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 707 Times in 647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Racist white men don't want to pay for pregnancy or women's issues, but we pay for their Viagra.....lets just cut their little dicks off so they won't need the Viagra.

    They actually think they can pick and chose healthcare as if ordering off a menu.

    They are the most vile and disgusting people on the planet.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TTQ64 For This Post:

    christiefan915 (06-23-2017), Phantasmal (06-22-2017)

  17. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    nothing on price controls for drugs. sad.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  18. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackvegetable View Post
    This would be the same mandate proposed by Heritage?
    Its simple....just prove the "messenger" is not presenting the facts...its not rocket science, its simply the method used by liberals in attacking the messenger of the truth delivered instead of addressing the documented and testable evidence presented. LIBERAL DEFLECTION 101.....Saul Alinsky style.


    FYI: TRUTH does not choose sides...what's truth for me is just as true for you, if not it was never true in the 1st place, its was just a subjective opinion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion even if its untrue, that's what makes the 1st amendment so grand a freedom...even liars can speak freely and prove to everyone what fools they actually are. What? Simply because you hate anything conservative...does that make the evidence presented "untrue" without you even once presenting any retort of evidence to the contrary? LMAO

    And no....the article presented was not found at the Heritage foundation even though the foundation would certainly endorse the article as truth instead of attempting to deflect and the foundation presents nothing that can't be documented by Government agencies, the documented facts were presented by the LINK provided.
    Last edited by Ralph; 06-22-2017 at 06:02 PM.

  19. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Where Woke Goes to Die
    Posts
    14,127
    Thanks
    10,362
    Thanked 8,959 Times in 6,246 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 483 Times in 453 Posts

    Default

    The government has no business being involved in healthcare. Period.

  20. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,465
    Thanks
    16,662
    Thanked 20,734 Times in 14,330 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,386 Times in 1,304 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deplorable Me View Post
    The government has no business being involved in healthcare. Period.
    Profit driven health insurance has no business being in healthcare.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    christiefan915 (06-23-2017), Nomad (06-22-2017), Rune (06-23-2017)

  22. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Where Woke Goes to Die
    Posts
    14,127
    Thanks
    10,362
    Thanked 8,959 Times in 6,246 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 483 Times in 453 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    Profit driven health insurance has no business being in healthcare.
    All the gubmint produces is crap because there is no incentive to produce a quality product. Thank God Obama is gone forever.

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Life is Golden For This Post:

    Bigdog (06-23-2017)

  24. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deplorable Me View Post
    All the gubmint produces is crap because there is no incentive to produce a quality product. Thank God Obama is gone forever.
    obama is not gone. He has set himself up to be the next leader of the clinton wing.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  25. The Following User Groans At tsuke For This Awful Post:

    Rune (06-23-2017)

  26. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    16,136
    Thanks
    10,959
    Thanked 19,485 Times in 9,083 Posts
    Groans
    1,448
    Groaned 1,427 Times in 1,256 Posts

    Default


  27. The Following User Says Thank You to signalmankenneth For This Post:

    christiefan915 (06-23-2017)

Similar Threads

  1. Romney is now campaigning on his healthcare bill?
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-27-2012, 07:06 AM
  2. 2 to 1 people think the healthcare bill did not go far enough
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-27-2010, 10:44 AM
  3. any healthcare bill MUST have a recorded vote
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 02:06 PM
  4. CBO AND THE FACTS - SENATE HEALTHCARE BILL
    By TuTu Monroe in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 10:08 PM
  5. What will the Healthcare bill BHO signs look like?
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-10-2009, 12:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •