What kind of country have we become?
One in which federal prosecutors can take “evidence” before a “grand jury,”
and that grand jury can “vote to indict” a former president for 91 alleged “crimes”?
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
This literally might be the most uneducated, dumbest, most uninformed statement I have ever seen on jpp.com.
Here's a tip. I keep my mouth shut on topics I know nothing about. Like the stock market, as one example. Just a suggestion, but you might consider doing the same.
Rune (06-22-2017)
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
MAGA MAN (06-22-2017)
This is a fun read. Now the example is specifically related to aviation but the theory and math are applicable on a larger scale
http://www.theenergycollective.com/r...energy-density
Science will not save you.
The point you are all missing is the fundamental fact that despite wind and solar being relatively abundant, they are diffuse forms of energy. Fossil fuels are dense forms of energy.
No amount of scientific research will change these underlying facts.
If you don't understand the difference between high density sources of energy and diffuse sources of energy then you will be duped into believing that solar and wind are going to save the day.
Use GA06 as an analogy. The democrat party threw $30 million into a losing cause. That is the myth of large scale wind and solar.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It just dawned on me that I am dealing with scientific morons so I am going to try to dumb this down as much as possible in the hopes that the scientifically illiterate will understand.
The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium.
What does this mean in English? It means that energy ALWAYS flows from a more concentrated state to a less concentrated state.
Read this again. Then read it again. Then read it again.
Because if you fail to understand this salient point then it is pointless to move on.
Now that you understand the Second Law of Thermodynamics you need to understand that "fossil fuels" are highly concentrated forms of energy. Things like wind and solar are diffuse (not highly concentrated) forms of energy. There is potentially lots of it, but they are not highly concentrated.
This means that oil, natural gas and coal will ALWAYS be more efficient than wind and solar because on a per molecule basis they just have more stored energy. The answer lies in their chemical bonds and nothing else.
Now those who claim that technology will solve the problem are speaking out of ignorance because there will never be a way to take the low concentrated rays of the sun and turn them into highly concentrated forms of energy without using more energy. To do so would violate the second law of thermodynamics. You can't go from a low concentration to a high concentration. It is impossible. Period. End of story.
Now I am not sure if I can explain the second law of thermodynamics any clearer than I have right here. The lesson is free. What you do with it is up to you.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.
Bookmarks