Interesting how conservatives can't defend, explain, or rationalize President Trump,

[archives]

when Obama was President you saw nothing but unending attacks from the right and those who supported Obama did offer a defense or something in support of his position, but nothing even close to that from conservatives on Trump.

The conservatives "defense" of Trump usually involves regurgitating Hillary, which is relevant since she lost, or generalizing some unrelated left leaning idea and then attacking it, they offer nothing in defense of their President or his actions

It all makes you wonder when they will actually see the reality that Trump is in way over his head

[PostmodernProphet]

we can't explain him to you because lib'ruls are rather dense.......

[Micawber]

Correct, so they simply claim all criticism is a pathological obsession rather than mount a defense. Ham handed, obvious, uncreative and so Republican.

[archives]

we can't explain him to you because lib'ruls are rather dense.......

From what I've seen, you can't explain him at all, to "lib'ruls" or anyone else who is watching

[Micawber]

Trump is an indefensible choice, pre-election and on his accomplishments. If they were honest they would simply say "I know, I know, we are racists, Obama was a great President, we could not stand for that and so in a fit of rage we elected a total idiot, now we are sober and regret that."

But they can't. Idiots are also possessed of huge and fragile egos. So they lash out like petulant children who dropped a binky. Cant admit they are wrong, wah wah wah.

[PostmodernProphet]

From what I've seen, you can't explain him at all, to "lib'ruls" or anyone else who is watching

so you believe everyone watching is as dense as you are?......

[cawacko]

when Obama was President you saw nothing but unending attacks from the right and those who supported Obama did offer a defense or something in support of his position, but nothing even close to that from conservatives on Trump.

The conservatives "defense" of Trump usually involves regurgitating Hillary, which is relevant since she lost, or generalizing some unrelated left leaning idea and then attacking it, they offer nothing in defense of their President or his actions

It all makes you wonder when they will actually see the reality that Trump is in way over his head

Thanks for the same daily post legion. You were on this board for the Obama years so your rose color glasses in the first sentence is rather funny.

[Cypress]

You are talking about a political party that thinks George Dumbya Bush and Sarah Palin were people who had the capability to be excellent presidential material. I never saw an impassioned defense of Willard Mittens Romney or John McCain by rightys, other than they "weren't Obama". I mean that is literally what passes for political philosophy in movement conservatives these days. To be against somebody, rather than for anything.

The fact they think a fat, septuagenarian, mentally incurious real estate landlord was a great choice for president speaks less to their judgment in picking good leaders, and more to their latent racial resentment and nihilism. It is not a party that actually believes in anything other than defeating democrats, "sticking it" to liberals, and slapping down uppity brown people.

That is exactly why you will episodically see Trumtards tacitly admit that their fat, old Orange Clown is a joke, but Hillary "would have been even worse!"

[Ralph]

when Obama was President you saw nothing but unending attacks from the right and those who supported Obama did offer a defense or something in support of his position, but nothing even close to that from conservatives on Trump.

The conservatives "defense" of Trump usually involves regurgitating Hillary, which is relevant since she lost, or generalizing some unrelated left leaning idea and then attacking it, they offer nothing in defense of their President or his actions

It all makes you wonder when they will actually see the reality that Trump is in way over his head

The answer you seek is found in the fact of just who started this thread....when anyone talks about obsessive behavior. Its much like "race baiting"....its simply trolling that deserves the attention it needs. The only defense that was needed was demonstrated on Nov. 8, 2016.

There is nothing to defend. What? Do you expect anyone that voted for The President feels the need to justify that support? Really? Why defend "FAKE" news and Baseless scandals? Suggesting anything needs defending ...benefits who? The fake news demwits.....silence is golden...if you had any evidence that could prove anything why ask for a defense....would the Teflon Don not already be behind bars? Democrats are so stupid.....its laughable but entertaining. Trolling/baiting by any other name is still trolling.

[GazzaQueen]

Don't forget the POTUS easily defeated the most qualified person to ever run for the office of President.

[canceled.2021.3]

Trump is white

[cawacko]

You are talking about a political party that thinks George Dumbya Bush and Sarah Palin were people who had the capability to be excellent presidential material. I never saw an impassioned defense of Willard Mittens Romney or John McCain by rightys, other than they "weren't Obama". I mean that is literally what passes for political philosophy in movement conservatives these days. To be against somebody, rather than for anything.

The fact they think a fat, septuagenarian, mentally incurious real estate landlord was a great choice for president speaks less to their judgment in picking good leaders, and more to their latent racial resentment and nihilism. It is not a party that actually believes in anything other than defeating democrats, "sticking it" to liberals, and slapping down uppity brown people.

That is exactly why you will episodically see Trumtards tacitly admit that their fat, old Orange Clown is a joke, but Hillary "would have been even worse!"

Yo, why the dissing of real estate?

[GazzaQueen]

Can Democrats defend, explain, or rationalize getting their butts shellacked in every election since 2012?

[Truth Detector]

Can Democrats defend, explain, or rationalize getting their butts shellacked in every election since 2012?

Actually, they have been losing BIG since BillyBobs Presidency. But alas, these dummies still think they were winning with Obama.

[Truth Detector]

when Obama was President you saw nothing but unending attacks from the right and those who supported Obama did offer a defense or something in support of his position, but nothing even close to that from conservatives on Trump.

Wrong; you saw Republicans rightly trying to stop his legislative agenda. That is when Obama went Unconstitutional and declared he would act without them.

What you didn't see was a bunch of whiney retards engaged in making a mockery of our electoral process and fabricating all kinds of hysterical impeachment rants.

You lack the basic intelligence it would take to be embarrassed by these moronic narratives against Trump.

The conservatives "defense" of Trump usually involves regurgitating Hillary, which is relevant since she lost, or generalizing some unrelated left leaning idea and then attacking it, they offer nothing in defense of their President or his actions

This is just a massive pile of malarkey. Our defense of Trump rests on the facts and the truth; that these asinine, insipid and puerile liberal attempts to infer impeachment offenses because they refuse to accept his electoral victory are moronic.

Again, you lack the basic intelligence to comprehend the obvious.

That stated, make no mistake about, once again the liberal left significantly LOWERS the bar of civility and political discourse in this country. Paybacks are a mother fucker.

It all makes you wonder when they will actually see the reality that Trump is in way over his head

More irony from a leftist that supported the most inexperienced, inept dunce to ever sit in the White House.

But in liberal idiot land, being a multi-billionaire owner of a massive business empire exhibits one's inexperience and being over his head.

Let's face it; you're an idiot which defines you as a gullible brain dead constituent of the Party of the Jackass.