trump: oblivious moron or psychotically narcissistic oblivious moron?

[Cancel 2018.2]

Okay, I'm gonna spend tomorrow being hungover. I don't much do Sundays, either. Now, you are an ornery, prideful bunch who will resent contributing too much to MY thread. Fuck that. You said you wanted something where power-mad, geeky mods did not push their weight around. You saw how "independent" threads on the other place died quick deaths. Mods here have gone out of their way to welcome us.

Do your duty. Post something here just to keep it alive, when I'm not here. This thread would not be the most active here because I started it. It is popular because WE/YOU found some hope and local Deplorables found a nightmare. Go back for bits of snark to the old place, but sustain this one. We are fucked if you don't.

This is a lightly moderated board. Except, be familiar with rule 12b, from what I've read, this is the one rule that even a hint at breaking it gets you banned. Other than that, apparently you can take other board feuds here, have a few socks, but not too many etc.

[Cancel 2018.2]

Accusing me of being the leader of our anarchic ark was a smart shot. Attacks the egos of the others.

I am a vanguard, I suppose, and even a leader in a herd that fancies itself comprised of leaders. The point here, however, is that you began your dance of typical rightard victimhood with a challenge that I/We were nothing more than some fake news sock created to counter the great mass of trump suckers.

Fact is, bitch, it is looking more and more like we are finding a home here. You are mostly likely dealing with Independence Day, ​where the aliens win.

What board did you say you came from again?

[Cancel 2018.2]

"I thought that was the way you rolled."

Only in cyber-space could a derivative white simp believe he could get away with using ghetto slang after it became clichéd.

Muhammad-wannabe wears parachute pants. Can't touch this.

I find this kind of thought process hilarious. I mean, when a black person adopts a so called white persona, he/she is considered a sell out, but white people don't criticize them for it. When a white person adopts anything so called black, they are ridiculed by black people and liberals.

I wonder why that is?

[Cancel 2018.2]

disclosing the contents of PMs as well has tracking mud from other boards here are rule violations here.......

I'm not sure either is a violation here, from my reading of the rules. I believe the PM rule only applies to PM's here, I hope I'm wrong though as one could easily circumvent that by simply joining another board and posting a PM from here and then claiming it is public on another board. But that it not made clear here.

Also, I see nothing about slinging mud about another board.

[cnm]

Yes, I support it. Why do you ask?

To fill in my scorecard.

[cnm]

I'm not sure either is a violation here, from my reading of the rules.

Hey, harshing the hall monitor's buzz! That's no way to get a merit badge.

[Cancel 2018.2]

Hey, harshing the hall monitor's buzz! That's no way to get a merit badge.

STFU. I was merely making an observation.

[Cancel 2018.2]

To fill in my scorecard.

What a life you lead. Asking an anonymous poster what his opinion is on public education.

You're like one of those people who keeps tabs on nothing, right?

Next time, ask me why I support it or why you don't, or STFU and go back to the board you and ricky ticky ran from.

[cancel2 2022]

You are lying, dude.

Any new predictions Nostradumbarse?

Sent from my iPhone 25S Turbo

[cancel2 2022]

This is a lightly moderated board. Except, be familiar with rule 12b, from what I've read, this is the one rule that even a hint at breaking it gets you banned. Other than that, apparently you can take other board feuds here, have a few socks, but not too many etc.

Snitch!

Sent from my iPhone 25S Turbo

[cnm]

What a life you lead. Asking an anonymous poster what his opinion is on public education.

What self awareness you display, complaining about being asked questions anonymously while answering them anonymously.

If you want to give up your anonymity please don't let me stop you.

[PostmodernProphet]

Yeah? Here is my quote -- what is it now then, the sixth time you've read it? "I turn on the news to find Republican Senators who helped write this stupid new healthcare law say they won't vote for it?"

Quote the specific words in that statement that says there are four in number and they all wrote it?

Could you be any denser? And no, that's not a challenge but I suspect it won't deter you from proving it true.

1)......four Republican senators were cited by the news as proposing to vote against it......thus ""I turn on the news to find Republican Senators who helped write this stupid new healthcare law say they won't vote for it?" = 4

2)....you said "I turn on the news to find Republican Senators who helped write this stupid new healthcare law say they won't vote for it?" thus senators who were on the news helped write it = those 4 helped write it.....

[PostmodernProphet]

What do you think that means? Highest values over what? 800,000 years was about 300ppm and now we're at about 400ppm?

I should think it obvious.....approximately every 150,000 years our planet ranges through a cycle of cooling and warming.......the last, around 125,000 years ago had a high temperature almost 2 degrees warmer than what we are experiencing.........

please explain to me how man-made global warming happened 150,000 years ago, 300,000 years ago and 450,000 years ago......

these measurements indicate that, at the beginning of the deglaciations, the CO2 increase either was in phase or lagged by less than ~1000 years with respect to the Antarctic temperature, whereas it clearly lagged behind the temperature at the onset of the glaciations.

do higher temperatures cause CO2 increases or do CO2 increases cause higher temperatures (the essence of lib'rul arguments about man-made global warming).........

[PostmodernProphet]

And trump's putting the minors back to werk....coincidence?....i think knot.

children should not twerk......

[PostmodernProphet]

The strong correlation between atmospheric greenhouse-gas concentrations and Antarctic temperature, previously described by Barnola et al. (1987), is confirmed by the extension of the Vostok ice-core record [...]


The extension of the Vostok CO2 record shows the present-day levels of CO2 are unprecedented during the past 420 kyr.

Thanks.

and from that you conclude human activity causes global warming?....../brillig......