trump: oblivious moron or psychotically narcissistic oblivious moron?

[RickyTavy]

I do not think I am going to like your political views, but I already like your humor!

I may not hate you either.

[Sailor]

I may not hate you either.

Thanks. I think.

[Owl'd You're Up!]

Hey, great to see you here. That handle is a minor work of art.

Concur 147% about the lack of an alerts feature like the one we are used to. Various other nits as well, but that's a big one.

Just got back from a trip to Michigan to visit our son. He seems to be getting serious about a certain girl up there, so we thought we should drive up and meet her. Very pleasant young lady. Thinks Trump is a world-historical tragedy, of course.

Thanks. Had a problem signing up, and needed a work-around, but I made it.

So, what's wrong with your son? For, the last persons I wanted around when serious about a girl were mom and dad.

[RickyTavy]

I'm gonna do something else now.

[PostmodernProphet]

good lord....a whole day of posting by the newbs and nothing but jackshit.......earn your keep, boys......

[cancel2 2022]

good lord....a whole day of posting by the newbs and nothing but jackshit.......earn your keep, boys......

Damo should create a sub-forum for them to spout shit all day long, maybe call it the Boring Old Farts forum?

Sent from my iPhone 25S Turbo

[InstantOn]

We saw a fox yesterday in a neighbor's field. I haven't seen one since our cat chased one out of our yard a few years ago.

[Micawber]

Very pleasant young lady. Thinks Trump is a world-historical tragedy, of course.

Clearly a lady of high birth.

[Micawber]

good lord....a whole day of posting by the newbs and nothing but jackshit.......earn your keep, boys......

Cuz your comments are so fantastic.

[Truth Detector]

You're serious aren't you?

It's pretty sad when not only can you not comprehend what I wrote, but you don't even understand your own words.

I can see why you focus exclusively on insulting others, rather than attempting to make a point. Sorry I bothered to reply. My bad, eh?

Dear asshat; I never take morons like you seriously. I merely point at them and laugh.

[Truth Detector]

You haven't read the article, and you cannot understand what science in the field of climate has accomplished over the last almost two centuries, but you postulate they had to be personally present to figure it out, with supreme confidence.

Nicely done, "Truth Detector".

I don't need to read an article that attempts to argue that MAN has caused the planet to warm; it's an asinine and farcical proposition intended for gullible morons on the left.

That stated; I am all eyes and ears for when the idiots who make this claim try to explain the warming and freezing periods of the past long before man ever walked the planet or invented the gasoline engine.

Dunce.

[X.O.]

Yes, absolutely.

Get her to pull your kayak.

[GazzaQueen]

Yes, absolutely.

Get her to pull your kayak.

The one he's got could pull a plow.

[kflaux]

Owl'd is perfectly capable of responding, but the geographical facts of the matter suggest that he may have already retired.

I don't need to read an article that attempts to argue that MAN has caused the planet to warm; it's an asinine and farcical proposition intended for gullible morons on the left.

And yet well over 99% of active (as in, publishing in peer-reviewed journals) climate scientists subscribe to this proposition.

How do you explain that? Can you point to any even remotely similar situation--in which over 99% of the scientists in a given field support a theory that is or was absurd on its face?

That stated; I am all eyes and ears for when the idiots who make this claim try to explain the warming and freezing periods of the past long before man ever walked the planet or invented the gasoline engine.

Hard to believe you're serious here.

You really want to argue that because humans have changed the climate through their actions in the most recent decades, they must therefore have been responsible for ALL past changes in climate?

[GazzaQueen]

Owl'd is perfectly capable of responding, but the geographical facts of the matter suggest that he may have already retired.


And yet well over 99% of active (as in, publishing in peer-reviewed journals) climate scientists subscribe to this proposition.

How do you explain that? Can you point to any even remotely similar situation--in which over 99% of the scientists in a given field support a theory that is or was absurd on its face?



Hard to believe you're serious here.

You really want to argue that because humans have changed the climate through their actions in the most recent decades, they must therefore have been responsible for ALL past changes in climate?

I used to be a climaphobe. Then I learned not to fear change. This is nature's way of clearing the human population. Out of this struggle will emerge a stronger, more weather-resistant humankind.