Prediction for Georgia Race?

**Truth Detector** · 06-20-2017, 09:22 PM

Originally Posted by Thing1

Or, maybe if they had a special election that wasn't in a deep red state...ya know?

Duh....

Hey, I wasn't the FAKE news trying to make this some kind of dimwitted referendum on Trump....DUNCE.

**Truth Detector** · 06-20-2017, 09:24 PM

Originally Posted by Thing1

What was your prediction again?

Oh, I remember - Hillary might win, unless Trump does.

I was right on in my predictions; regardless of all the lampooning I got from you leftTards. You low information twits still don't get and actually, stupidly, believe you can change the results of an election outcome by stomping your little feety real loud.

**Cancel 2018.1** · 06-20-2017, 09:31 PM

Originally Posted by anatta

RCP has had Ossoff in a slight lead for awhile..so much for polls (again)

I thought polls had become more scientific and therefore more accurate. The '80 Reagan Carter fiasco was never supposed to happen again.
I guess they're now part of fake news.

**Cancel 2020.1** · 06-20-2017, 09:32 PM

Originally Posted by aloysious

I thought polls had become more scientific and therefore more accurate. The '80 Reagan Carter fiasco was never supposed to happen again.
I guess they're now part of fake news.

You're going to have to fill me in on when polls were ever supposed to be an exact science.

**BRUTALITOPS** · 06-20-2017, 10:03 PM

Originally Posted by Thing1

I even started a thread about it.

How is Ryan doing, anyway? Wasn't Trump's big plan of ousting him supposed to come to fruition by now?

what his plan is and it coming to fruition are two different things. You fail to read my posts correctly and then project your ignorance and poor reading comprehension onto me.

**anatta** · 06-20-2017, 10:05 PM

Originally Posted by aloysious

I thought polls had become more scientific and therefore more accurate. The '80 Reagan Carter fiasco was never supposed to happen again.
I guess they're now part of fake news.

the polls are still within the margin of error -they were for Trump's election too.
But they keep missing the fact the Democratic party has lost the old Reagan Democrats (among others)

**BRUTALITOPS** · 06-20-2017, 10:08 PM

Originally Posted by Thing1

What was your prediction again?

Oh, I remember - Hillary might win, unless Trump does.

My predictions, a year in advance were:

the obama coalition would not turn out for Hillary the way they did for obama

trumps white male midwestern strategy and why alienation hispanics didn't matter

thorough analysis on why 30% isn't zero

**Cancel 2020.1** · 06-20-2017, 10:16 PM

Originally Posted by SHITBALLS

what his plan is and it coming to fruition are two different things. You fail to read my posts correctly and then project your ignorance and poor reading comprehension onto me.

Yeah? Kind of like when I started a thread called "Battleground: Texas?" and you took it as me saying "OMG! OMG! Hillary is winning TX!!!"

Like that, dopey?

**BRUTALITOPS** · 06-20-2017, 10:19 PM

I knew exactly what you were implying and it was retarded. You were being retarded and I was correct

**Cancel 2020.1** · 06-20-2017, 10:21 PM

Originally Posted by SHITBALLS

I knew exactly what you were implying and it was retarded. You were being retarded and I was correct

That's a lame attempt to cover your stupidity. I could say the same thing.

You were an idiot. You immediately started stomping your feet and had to make your big bet against my "guarantee" that Hillary would TX.

**BRUTALITOPS** · 06-20-2017, 10:26 PM

For some reason you think I've backed away from my previous position.. I haven't. You were always wrong to start that thread, and very stupid. Why didn't you start a thread about trump winning Michigan? At the time the odds of trump winning Michigan and Clinton winning Texas were the exact same... turns out you would have been far more justified making a battleground Michigan thread, but that never even occurred to you, even though the odds were exactly the same. Why is that? Because you though Clinton was going to crush it everywhere. That shows where your head was at. I am your political master. I bested you so many times last year I lost count.

**Cancel 2020.1** · 06-20-2017, 10:28 PM

Originally Posted by SHITBALLS

For some reason you think I've backed away from my previous position.. I haven't. You were always wrong to start that thread, and very stupid. Why didn't you start a thread about trump winning Michigan? At the time the odds of trump winning Michigan and Clinton winning Texas were the exact same... turns out you would have been far more justified making a battleground Michigan thread, but that never even occurred to you, even though the odds were exactly the same. Why is that? Because you though Clinton was going to crush it everywhere. That shows where your head was at. I am your political master. I bested you so many times last year I lost count.

Why didn't I start a thread about Trump winning Michigan?

Are you Yurt now?

Man, is that a sad fall. I remember when I used to respect your posts. Actually, no - that's the 1st lie I've told on this site. I don't remember a time like that, at all.

**BRUTALITOPS** · 06-20-2017, 10:33 PM

Why didn't you? The odds were the exact same at the time of your post. You never waxed philosophically how trump could break the blue wall but you were hot and heavy over Clinton taking Texas. So so so wrong.

**Cancel 2020.1** · 06-20-2017, 10:35 PM

Originally Posted by SHITBALLS

Why didn't you? The odds were the exact same at the time of your post. You never waxed philosophically how trump could break the blue wall but you were hot and heavy over Clinton taking Texas. So so so wrong.

Um, maybe because the prospect of Dems winning TX was more interesting to me than the prospect of Trump winning MI?

Duh?

Are you looking for objective reporters to cover the news for JPP? Sorry, kid - that ain't me. I'm Op-Ed.