London Apartment Tower ENGULFED in flames for a day but NO COLLAPSE!!!

[SmarterthanYou]

This sounds like you want to take your bat and ball and go home.

At 12 years of age, I learned that I can take a horse to water but I can't make him drink. I gave y'all something to consider, y'all didn't want to because you're 'engineers' with them there college degrees and are smarter than the average bears, so good luck.

[Irish]

I'll say it again, I have a degree in this science, and I knew that the towers would fall when I was watching the 9/11 event unfold on television. The mechanisms why are 100% fact based and simple to understand. Yet liberal retards refuse to learn, just like they refuse to learn economics and history.

Its why they are Libtards.

[SmarterthanYou]

Who? "The government" Is very vague. There are many levels and actors.

let me guess........as a government stooge, you'd like to see detailed outlines and bulletpoint arguments about which government entity, the reporting agencies they have attached to them, and the very specific powers that each one has that they didn't before. am i right?

[Nomad]

Its why they are Libtards.

Not libtards, contard.

Truthers are mostly libertariantards.

[Irish]

I think we can all agree this thread proves BAC is a complete moron.

[USFREEDOM911]

then ask RIGHT to provide it.

Untrue - Right never said anything about the EXPECTATION of them "falling"; because that was your conclusion.

and you're seriously going to sit there and try to tell me that engineering and structure forensics for these two buildings was SO EXACT!!!!!!! that it could be built to fall straight down in upon itself no matter the cause of the damage??????

[Irish]

let me guess........as a government stooge, you'd like to see detailed outlines and bulletpoint arguments about which government entity, the reporting agencies they have attached to them, and the very specific powers that each one has that they didn't before. am i right?

Who in the govt did it, and what did they gain? You still haven't specified.

[SmarterthanYou]

You could argue the govt. lost a lot too. THey lost a lot of troops, supplies, money, etc., With the WOT.

So one could argue this was orgichtraded by the private sector to punish the govt.

well now you're just being stupid. military ranks SWELLED with new recruits after 9/11. budgets were changed and the MIC gained billions. not to mention that governments sole purpose is war to control it's people......but hey, i'm not college graduate so what do I know.

[SmarterthanYou]

YOu're in agreement with BAC, and Deshtard. Don't you think you may be wrong?

what EXACTLY am I in agreement with them on?

[SmarterthanYou]

non-partisan 9/11 commission

when government investigates government, it's ALWAYS non partisan, right stooge?

[SmarterthanYou]

Untrue - Right never said anything about the EXPECTATION of them "falling"; because that was your conclusion.

a few posts ago he stated he knew they would fall, so how stupid are you really?

[GazzaQueen]

well now you're just being stupid. military ranks SWELLED with new recruits after 9/11. budgets were changed and the MIC gained billions. not to mention that governments sole purpose is war to control it's people......but hey, i'm not college graduate so what do I know.

You're conflating cause and consequences. Because military budgets increased does not equate with them causing the attack.

[SmarterthanYou]

Who in the govt did it, and what did they gain? You still haven't specified.

again, you're asking me like i'm supposed to be in the know or something. as to what they gained, are you going to go the contard route of asking me what specific rights did I lose?

[SmarterthanYou]

You're conflating cause and consequences. Because military budgets increased does not equate with them causing the attack.

I'll repost this in caps and with very large spaces between words so maybe you'll understand, since the first time was probably too fast for you.

MILITARY.
BUDGETS.
INCREASED.
AFTER 9/11.

are you able to follow that now?

[USFREEDOM911]

then you suck ass as a scientist with an engineering degree because you're missing a supposedly very important factor in your 'loads' which is the fire and initial damage from the jet. but lets not let awkward issues fuck with your scenario.



and you're basing your theory on the hypothesis of BOTH planes causing almost the SAME AMOUNT of LOCALIZED damage, and that the fire from both jets caused an EQUAL AMOUNT of heat damage to those 8 supporting joists in BOTH BUILDINGS just so that they both collapsed in upon themselves in almost the exact way each............

and you think those odds are the same as a group of 19 individuals who actually PLANNED on ramming two planes in to two buildings.......

yeah, i see how that works in idiot land.

Let's see, shall we.

Both buildings, built in a similar fashion, getting hit by commercial airlines, in a similar fashion, and then them both collapsing, in a similar fashion.

What is your confusion?