Reply With QuoteI never made the claim that it was built with the expectation of "falling", so that proof would be the responsibility of the one who suggested it.Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
No, I really want to provide some monetary help; so you can continue with your crusade.hyperbole and ridicule. a sure sign you're losing due to facts.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
I never made the claim that it was built with the expectation of "falling", so that proof would be the responsibility of the one who suggested it.
SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.
Banned
I have not read it from the beginning but I have the last few pages. I think my question is justified.
Let's go Brandon!
The science doesn't have to be exact. The only load acting on the buildings between the time of the crashes and collapse were gravity, which acts straight downward.
Let me explain it as simply as possible. The two towers were built with a ring of perimeter columns, and a second smaller ring surrounding the elevator core. The crashes and fires were tens of stories below the top of the building, so there were huge gravity loads acting on the columns in the fire area. The heavy steel columns were braced by the interior floors (roughly 10' spacing). The floors were all supported by bar joists, which are very light weight. Once the joists got soft from the fires they sagged and could no longer support the columns.
Once the support was lost the weight of the upper floors crushed the columns and then the whole mess started to accelerate by gravity downward. So the next floor below got dynamic loads in addition to gravity loads, and collapsed. That continued right down to the ground.
rebel
dude, I asked a simple damned question and was given a bullshit answer that NOBODY has been able to answer with good, definitive information. would you like to try it?Just because you run from the facts, doesn't mean that there is no basis to them.
Just accept the fact that you have nothing but conjecture, supposition, and assumptions to suggest that your paranoid conclusion is fact.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
yeah, you're right. the government is a stand up, never do bad, organization that ONLY works for our best interests and safety. how could i have been so wrong..........
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
you're right. government is good and noble. would NEVER do anything wrong to us. my bad.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
then ask RIGHT to provide it.I never made the claim that it was built with the expectation of "falling", so that proof would be the responsibility of the one who suggested it.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Verified User
How did they do it, I wonder. What do you say?
rebel
then you suck ass as a scientist with an engineering degree because you're missing a supposedly very important factor in your 'loads' which is the fire and initial damage from the jet. but lets not let awkward issues fuck with your scenario.
and you're basing your theory on the hypothesis of BOTH planes causing almost the SAME AMOUNT of LOCALIZED damage, and that the fire from both jets caused an EQUAL AMOUNT of heat damage to those 8 supporting joists in BOTH BUILDINGS just so that they both collapsed in upon themselves in almost the exact way each............
and you think those odds are the same as a group of 19 individuals who actually PLANNED on ramming two planes in to two buildings.......
yeah, i see how that works in idiot land.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
rebel
why are you asking me that? do you think i'm part of the government?
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
BIDEN WON.
You should.
You being the resident expert on the subject of how things work in idiot land.
C'MON MAN!!!!
rebel
yet you're the one swallowing the government koolaid. whatever.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Verified User
I think that any story that you can come up with is much more bizarre and unlikely than what we all saw with our own eyes.
But I know you have an explanation. Maybe it's your secret.
rebel
if I had an explanation, I would have put it up here long ago.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Posting Rules
Bookmarks