Originally Posted by
Micawber
Dumb question regarding smaller mass collapsing larger one straight down. Your error is supposing the entire mass beneath has an additive effect that increases the strength of any single given support elements of a single floor. It doesn't. The mass above and below were not solid. Additive mass below is irrelevant. Rather, the mass of 20 floors is apparently enough to crush and break a heat weakened single one below. Then mass of 21 falling, is apparently enough to break a single one too, so too the mass of 22 falling is apparently enough to break the next one, and so forth. If you can wrap your mind around 20 breaking and releasing a single one, and you believe in a snowball getting larger as it goes down, you should have no problem buying the conventional explanation relating to what you saw that day.
Nice try . Thanks .. but again, it makes absolutely no scientific sense whatsoever. Buildings do not react like that .. AND, your theory does nothing to explain WTC 7 which went from a standstill right into free fall collapse within seconds.
Buildings ALWAYS topple over.
You also missed the question of the day .. if buildings can collapse from furniture fires .. why has that never happened before of after 9/11?
Last edited by blackascoal; 06-22-2017 at 11:39 AM.
AMERICAN HISTORY ITSELF IS A TESTAMENT TO THE STRENGTH AND RESILIENCE OF AFRICAN PEOPLE. WE, ALONG WITH THE COURGE AND SACRIFICES OF CONSCIOUS WHITE AMERICANS, LIKE VIOLA LIUZZO, EVERETT DIRKSEN, AND MANY OTHERS, HAVE FOUGHT AND DIED TOGETHER FOR OUR FREEDOM, AND FOR OUR SURVIVAL.
In America, rights are are not determined by what is just, fair, equitable, honest, nor by what Jesus would do. Rights are determined ONLY by what you can DEMAND.
Bookmarks