Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

[Darth Omar]

You can try, but it appears you keep digging yourself in. Perhaps you should remember the first law of holes.



Are you denying any of the things I wrote? If so, please specify which one so I can prove you did them.

You’re a troll, and as rule, I don’t feed them.

Fundie.

[Doc Dutch]

You’re a troll, and as rule, I don’t feed them.

Fundie.

You're butthurt. I understand.

Fundie. Is that an accusation or a confession? Please clarify.

[Cypress]

To be fair, what would questioning abiogenesis make you?

Questioning in what way?

I have questions about biological emergence.


But I assume you mean questioning the premise that single celled primitive life emerged as a result of natural physical and chemical processes?

[AProudLefty]

Questioning in what way?

I have questions about biological emergence.


But I assume you mean questioning the premise that single celled primitive life emerged as a result of physical and chemical processes?

Darth Omar was questioning the inorganic to organic transition to life.

[BidenPresident]

You’re a troll, and as rule, I don’t feed them.

Fundie.

Everyone hates that troll Dutch Uncle.

[Cypress]

Darth Omar was questioning the inorganic to organic transition to life.

I am not going to categorically rule out that biological emergence could have been an act of providential design.

But to practice wholesale skepticism that the conventional laws of chemistry and physics could not result in the jump from a pre-biotic soup to bio-molecules and cellular structure is a leap too far for me.

[Darth Omar]

Darth Omar was questioning the inorganic to organic transition to life.

It’s a question only a ‘creationist’ would ask lol.

[Darth Omar]

I am not going to categorically rule out that biological emergence could have been an act of providential design.

But to practice wholesale skepticism that the conventional laws of chemistry and physics could not result in the jump from a pre-biotic soup to bio-molecules and cellular structure is a leap too far for me.

Science is founded on skepticism.

[BidenPresident]

Many physicists do not consider life to be magic. The distinction between the organic and inorganic was disputed in the early 20th century by Schrodinger and others.

Abiogenesis would be based on the idea that an absolute distinction exists between the two. Without that conceptual model, we can see all forms of matter as universal without the special category of life.

[BidenPresident]

Science is founded on skepticism.

Not absolute skepticism, which would make knowledge impossible.

[AProudLefty]

It’s a question only a ‘creationist’ would ask lol.

LOL. Well maybe an intelligentist. LOL

[Cypress]

I am not going to categorically rule out that biological emergence could have been an act of providential design.

But to practice wholesale skepticism that the conventional laws of chemistry and physics could not result in the jump from a pre-biotic soup to bio-molecules and cellular structure is a leap too far for me.

Science is founded on skepticism.

I said wholesale skepticism, aka inordinate skepticism, exaggerated skepticism, immoderate skepticism - take your pick.

Inference to the best explanation would weigh the probability of conventional physical and chemical processes to be more likely, than a miraculous act of divine intervention.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

It’s a question only a ‘creationist’ would ask lol.

It's a question only someone who is completely ignorant of the theory of evolution would ask. Someone like a creationist.

[Into the Night]

Planetary scientists believe early Mars had an atmosphere and liquid water billions of years ago, before losing it's atmosphere.

Not possible. Mars has not changed in size. There is no such thing as 'planetary science'.

The fact that water erosion geomorophic features are observed on the surface of Mars corroborates this.

What water erosion features?

Look man, you wrote so many responses to me it filled up my notifications wall.

Stop making so many mistakes.

That is actually a little creepy and I do not have the time or inclination to read your 30 responses to me, or whatever is is.

Stop making so many mistakes.

[Into the Night]

IMO, all one can do is be true to one's conscience. I do not play on message board teams when it comes to religion.

My two cents: there are not that many authentic Christians on this message board. Being an authentic Christian, Buddhist, or Muslim takes remarkable commitment and effort.

I rarely see that kind of commitment demostrated on message boards from most self-identified Christians. I periodically attend church myself, but I refrain from calling myself a devout, practicing Christian.

True Scotsman fallacy.