Members banned from this thread: katzgar


Page 84 of 131 FirstFirst ... 347480818283848586878894 ... LastLast
Results 1,246 to 1,260 of 1957

Thread: Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

  1. #1246 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    47,911
    Thanks
    13,829
    Thanked 30,819 Times in 20,314 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,268 Times in 1,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    You can try, but it appears you keep digging yourself in. Perhaps you should remember the first law of holes.



    Are you denying any of the things I wrote? If so, please specify which one so I can prove you did them.
    You’re a troll, and as rule, I don’t feed them.

    Fundie.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  2. #1247 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    45,403
    Thanks
    13,732
    Thanked 20,029 Times in 15,708 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,131 Times in 2,089 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    You’re a troll, and as rule, I don’t feed them.

    Fundie.
    You're butthurt. I understand.

    Fundie. Is that an accusation or a confession? Please clarify.
    Stripping Americans of their rights, regardless if unalienable or unenumerated, is against American ideals

  3. #1248 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    36,117
    Thanks
    18,012
    Thanked 24,434 Times in 12,658 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 2,322 Times in 2,087 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    To be fair, what would questioning abiogenesis make you?
    Questioning in what way?

    I have questions about biological emergence.


    But I assume you mean questioning the premise that single celled primitive life emerged as a result of natural physical and chemical processes?

  4. #1249 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    41,342
    Thanks
    13,195
    Thanked 8,547 Times in 7,000 Posts
    Groans
    424
    Groaned 1,534 Times in 1,477 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Questioning in what way?

    I have questions about biological emergence.


    But I assume you mean questioning the premise that single celled primitive life emerged as a result of physical and chemical processes?
    Darth Omar was questioning the inorganic to organic transition to life.
    Quote Originally Posted by Damocles View Post
    Nah, he'll be right there, willing to give his spleen right now because he signed a card. "Here's my papers, sir!" He'll say as he proves to his beloved government and the super desirable government tracking program that HE at least is perfectly capable of carrying the right papers at all times and that super benevolent Federal government programs deserve his immediate and prolific obedience!

  5. #1250 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    12,403
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4,048 Times in 2,838 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 313 Times in 299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    You’re a troll, and as rule, I don’t feed them.

    Fundie.
    Everyone hates that troll Dutch Uncle.

  6. #1251 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    36,117
    Thanks
    18,012
    Thanked 24,434 Times in 12,658 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 2,322 Times in 2,087 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Darth Omar was questioning the inorganic to organic transition to life.
    I am not going to categorically rule out that biological emergence could have been an act of providential design.

    But to practice wholesale skepticism that the conventional laws of chemistry and physics could not result in the jump from a pre-biotic soup to bio-molecules and cellular structure is a leap too far for me.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    AProudLefty (06-14-2021)

  8. #1252 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    47,911
    Thanks
    13,829
    Thanked 30,819 Times in 20,314 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,268 Times in 1,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Darth Omar was questioning the inorganic to organic transition to life.
    It’s a question only a ‘creationist’ would ask lol.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  9. #1253 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    47,911
    Thanks
    13,829
    Thanked 30,819 Times in 20,314 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,268 Times in 1,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    I am not going to categorically rule out that biological emergence could have been an act of providential design.

    But to practice wholesale skepticism that the conventional laws of chemistry and physics could not result in the jump from a pre-biotic soup to bio-molecules and cellular structure is a leap too far for me.
    Science is founded on skepticism.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  10. #1254 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    12,403
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4,048 Times in 2,838 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 313 Times in 299 Posts

    Default

    Many physicists do not consider life to be magic. The distinction between the organic and inorganic was disputed in the early 20th century by Schrodinger and others.

    Abiogenesis would be based on the idea that an absolute distinction exists between the two. Without that conceptual model, we can see all forms of matter as universal without the special category of life.

  11. #1255 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    12,403
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4,048 Times in 2,838 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 313 Times in 299 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Science is founded on skepticism.
    Not absolute skepticism, which would make knowledge impossible.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to BidenPresident For This Post:

    Cypress (06-14-2021)

  13. #1256 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    41,342
    Thanks
    13,195
    Thanked 8,547 Times in 7,000 Posts
    Groans
    424
    Groaned 1,534 Times in 1,477 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    It’s a question only a ‘creationist’ would ask lol.
    LOL. Well maybe an intelligentist. LOL
    Quote Originally Posted by Damocles View Post
    Nah, he'll be right there, willing to give his spleen right now because he signed a card. "Here's my papers, sir!" He'll say as he proves to his beloved government and the super desirable government tracking program that HE at least is perfectly capable of carrying the right papers at all times and that super benevolent Federal government programs deserve his immediate and prolific obedience!

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to AProudLefty For This Post:

    Dutch Uncle (06-14-2021)

  15. #1257 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    36,117
    Thanks
    18,012
    Thanked 24,434 Times in 12,658 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 2,322 Times in 2,087 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    I am not going to categorically rule out that biological emergence could have been an act of providential design.

    But to practice wholesale skepticism that the conventional laws of chemistry and physics could not result in the jump from a pre-biotic soup to bio-molecules and cellular structure is a leap too far for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Science is founded on skepticism.
    I said wholesale skepticism, aka inordinate skepticism, exaggerated skepticism, immoderate skepticism - take your pick.

    Inference to the best explanation would weigh the probability of conventional physical and chemical processes to be more likely, than a miraculous act of divine intervention.

  16. #1258 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,825
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 1,570 Times in 1,082 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 181 Times in 171 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    It’s a question only a ‘creationist’ would ask lol.
    It's a question only someone who is completely ignorant of the theory of evolution would ask. Someone like a creationist.
    He that tweets much, is much mistaken

  17. #1259 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    28,505
    Thanks
    9,020
    Thanked 5,643 Times in 4,972 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 358 Times in 348 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Planetary scientists believe early Mars had an atmosphere and liquid water billions of years ago, before losing it's atmosphere.
    Not possible. Mars has not changed in size. There is no such thing as 'planetary science'.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    The fact that water erosion geomorophic features are observed on the surface of Mars corroborates this.
    What water erosion features?
    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Look man, you wrote so many responses to me it filled up my notifications wall.
    Stop making so many mistakes.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    That is actually a little creepy and I do not have the time or inclination to read your 30 responses to me, or whatever is is.
    Stop making so many mistakes.
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome

    Everything else debunked here

  18. #1260 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    28,505
    Thanks
    9,020
    Thanked 5,643 Times in 4,972 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 358 Times in 348 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    IMO, all one can do is be true to one's conscience. I do not play on message board teams when it comes to religion.

    My two cents: there are not that many authentic Christians on this message board. Being an authentic Christian, Buddhist, or Muslim takes remarkable commitment and effort.

    I rarely see that kind of commitment demostrated on message boards from most self-identified Christians. I periodically attend church myself, but I refrain from calling myself a devout, practicing Christian.
    True Scotsman fallacy.
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome

    Everything else debunked here

Similar Threads

  1. Public Schools are Visiting the Creation Museum on Field Trips...
    By christiefan915 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 04-26-2016, 01:23 PM
  2. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 08-13-2013, 09:50 PM
  3. 10 Terrible Things Republicans Will Try......
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-29-2010, 12:31 PM
  4. Paleontologists brought to tears, laughter by Creation Museum
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 12-04-2009, 06:16 PM
  5. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-11-2007, 09:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •