Members banned from this thread: Buckly J. Ewer


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: More left wing bias by CNN, who is now more left than MSNBC: bullet numbers matter

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    19,400
    Thanks
    1,745
    Thanked 6,394 Times in 5,099 Posts
    Groans
    1,397
    Groaned 908 Times in 849 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default More left wing bias by CNN, who is now more left than MSNBC: bullet numbers matter

    London police fired 50 rounds to kill 3 attackers

    London terror attack: Police fired 'unprecedented' number of rounds

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/04/europe...new/index.html

    Really, the major headline is the number of bullets used to kill the terrorists and stop them from killing more people.

    Really?

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    London police fired 50 rounds to kill 3 attackers

    London terror attack: Police fired 'unprecedented' number of rounds

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/04/europe...new/index.html

    Really, the major headline is the number of bullets used to kill the terrorists and stop them from killing more people.

    Really?
    They have gone from good ( when they first started in the 80's), to mediocre, to just whining partisan non journalists. Not even worth even looking at even briefly for any reliable news source.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaya View Post
    London police fired 50 rounds to kill 3 attackers

    London terror attack: Police fired 'unprecedented' number of rounds

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/04/europe...new/index.html

    Really, the major headline is the number of bullets used to kill the terrorists and stop them from killing more people.

    Really?
    Yes, really. An innocent man was shot by a cop. So spraying fire is an issue. Duh. The lunatic fringe right has lost the ability to reason. In an urban civilian setting, if not anywhere, there is this thing called "aim."

    Look it up. It's in all the literature.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Yes, really. An innocent man was shot by a cop. So spraying fire is an issue. Duh. The lunatic fringe right has lost the ability to reason. In an urban civilian setting, if not anywhere, there is this thing called "aim."

    Look it up. It's in all the literature.
    So tell me there Rambo, how many fire fights you been in? Shut the fuck up.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    So tell me there Rambo, how many fire fights you been in? Shut the fuck up.
    You appear to be an angry miserable person.

    Fog of war is a legit issue they should discuss too, but to attack the media, in fact dismissing it in advance, for discussing legitimate issues is more evidence you right wingers have exchanged reason for tribe. Carry on, emotional tribal person. Watch Fox. They do news the way you want it to be, with blinders on.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Yes, really. An innocent man was shot by a cop. So spraying fire is an issue. Duh. The lunatic fringe right has lost the ability to reason. In an urban civilian setting, if not anywhere, there is this thing called "aim."

    Look it up. It's in all the literature.
    Are they saying the cops should shoot less during terrorist attacks?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    anatta (06-05-2017)

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    You appear to be an angry miserable person.

    Fog of war is a legit issue they should discuss too, but to attack the media, in fact dismissing it in advance, for discussing legitimate issues is more evidence you right wingers have exchanged reason for tribe. Carry on, emotional tribal person. Watch Fox. They do news the way you want it to be, with blinders on.
    Quite the contrary. I am and happy and rational. I still noticed you have not answered the question. How many fire fights have you been in to critic a situation like this?

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Are they saying the cops should shoot less during terrorist attacks?
    Apparently PackD thinks they should just go up and give them hugs.

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Apparently PackD thinks they should just go up and give them hugs.
    Pretty sure that wouldn't work lol.

    To the OP point, it's typical left wing media reportage to focus on someone-anything besides radical Islam or Muslims. For example, the headline could be about the fact an innocent bystander was a victim of collateral damage.

    But NEVER would CNN headline with 'London struck by radical Islamists for second time in a year' even though it's quite factual and coincides with what goes through normal people's brains when they hear of the event.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    anatta (06-05-2017)

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Are they saying the cops should shoot less during terrorist attacks?
    apparently so....Damned if they do, and damned if they dont..
    Kissinger: “demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one.”
    ________

    Cold War 2.0 Russia hysteria is turning people’s brains into guacamole.
    We’ve got to find a way to snap out of the propaganda trance
    ________

    Buddha: "trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it "
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7. All Good Children Go to Heaven

  13. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Pretty sure that wouldn't work lol.

    To the OP point, it's typical left wing media reportage to focus on someone-anything besides radical Islam or Muslims. For example, the headline could be about the fact an innocent bystander was a victim of collateral damage.

    But NEVER would CNN headline with 'London struck by radical Islamists for second time in a year' even though it's quite factual and coincides with what goes through normal people's brains when they hear of the event.
    they are too busy ginning up Russian hysteria

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Darth Omar (06-05-2017)

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Are they saying the cops should shoot less during terrorist attacks?
    I don't know, I didn't read it. I don't have to in order to notice right wingnuts attack ing subject matter that by its own terms is legit after adding one fact of which I am independently aware.
    That impugns their motive completely. If friendly fire shot a citizen, the issue is 100% legit. We get it, they reject conventional everything. Hate everything they perceive as controlling anything.
    It's all a scam. It's all a racket. It's all about fucking them over. Got it. Signed sealed and delivered loud and clear. So can they now just die and let me read my New York Times, Harpers and Foreign Affairs?

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    they are too busy ginning up Russian hysteria
    Libya

  17. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    apparently so....Damned if they do, and damned if they dont..
    Oh shut up, you can win for losing. Don't let them tell you otherwise.

  18. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Quite the contrary. I am and happy and rational. I still noticed you have not answered the question. How many fire fights have you been in to critic a situation like this?
    If you feel like bragging, just shut up about me and get on with it. You are an angry grizzled rightee who yells at kids stepping on his lawn. You drive a old ford, have don't tread on me and Trump stickers on your bumper.
    You wear a smeared wife beater and have hairy shoulders. You drink Blatz, early and often. Your haggar polyester doubleknits are stretched to the breech. Your belly looks like Cool Hand Luke after 50 eggs. You are venal and have
    unsavory personal hygiene. Your dog runs for cover when you enter the house.
    Last edited by Micawber; 06-05-2017 at 05:54 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Left wing news bias....?
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-27-2013, 07:10 PM
  2. Left-wing paradise?
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-31-2013, 04:20 AM
  3. It seems the left wing is more outraged over
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-13-2012, 07:09 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •