liberals have gone full retard. Been saying it for a month now. JPP has just become a circlejerk of retards that have no knowledge of politics.
Members banned from this thread: Buckly J. Ewer |
I've been asking this and no liberal has been able to answer.
Here is your chance.
christiefan915 (05-20-2017)
Callinectes (05-21-2017), cancel2 2022 (05-20-2017), Evmetro (05-19-2017), Irish (05-20-2017), PostmodernProphet (05-20-2017)
FYI
I would like Jarod's input. And Christiefan's.
Maybe I'll play devils advocate lol.
The only crime they have a prayer of nailing Trump with is obstruction of justice. Collusion not only lacks evidence---it's not a federal crime. I never thought about that.
But if that's true, Mueller is wasting his time investigating it, since he can't bring an indictment even if there was collusion. In fact, he may even be out of bounds looking for evidence of something that is not a federal crime.
His role is federal prosecutor and not a private eye.
This raises the possibility that Trump threw them a curve ball with appointing a SP. It's going to be at least somewhat of a reprieve. I read somewhere that Mueller is asking that congress no longer hold public hearings on it. That's not so good news for the anti-Trump hacks because it's going to keep the issue out of the news and make it harder to impede Trump's agenda.
Also, as Dershowitz pointed out, it may even stop the leaks since Mueller will probably run a tight ship. I'm fairly convinced the leaks are coordinated to come out in a timely fashion.
I would love to know who is behind it.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
cancel2 2022 (05-20-2017), Stretch (05-20-2017)
christiefan915 (05-20-2017), Nomad (05-20-2017)
Someone explain to Dershowitz as well as the sniveling Trumptards around here, that the reason for an investigation is to find out if there was a crime. If it is found that a crime or crimes was/were committed, then the answer to your question will be evident.
C'MON MAN!!!!
Althea (05-20-2017), christiefan915 (05-20-2017)
That's correct about trump...thus far. But the investigation already has, and will continue to expose crimes perpetrated by his staff. To date, Manafort/Flynn are screwed....the latter much more than the former.
Kushner is next.
Many leaks are coming directly from trump, who believes he's throwing more smoke into the process. Sadly, he has the attention span of a gnat, so he never thinks through his actions before creating another nail in his coffin.But if that's true, Mueller is wasting his time investigating it, since he can't bring an indictment even if there was collusion. In fact, he may even be out of bounds looking for evidence of something that is not a federal crime.
His role is federal prosecutor and not a private eye.
This raises the possibility that Trump threw them a curve ball with appointing a SP. It's going to be at least somewhat of a reprieve. I read somewhere that Mueller is asking that congress no longer hold public hearings on it. That's not so good news for the anti-Trump hacks because it's going to keep the issue out of the news and make it harder to impede Trump's agenda.
Also, as Dershowitz pointed out, it may even stop the leaks since Mueller will probably run a tight ship. I'm fairly convinced the leaks are coordinated to come out in a timely fashion.
I would love to know who is behind it.
The other leaks are coming from his staff, who have grown disgusted with the way he conducts the business of running the country. They are patriots who realize the danger of having an adolescent run things.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
christiefan915 (05-20-2017)
Stretch (05-20-2017)
Some of it could possibly be intentional by Trump, since you can systematically role out leakers by knowing who was/wasn't present when something was said.
But like virtually everything with Collusion Gate---it's speculation.
Thus far lol...there's no evidence of collusion. How long should democrats push it? It will always play well with the faithful, but don't you worry about independents? How long before they conclude that democrats are unjustifiably trying to take down a president?
The term for that is 'soft coup'. Don't you need them to get the WH back?
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Stretch (05-20-2017)
Stretch (05-20-2017)
Stretch (05-20-2017)
Bookmarks